Monday, February 16, 2026

US Lawmakers Shmooze with Zelensky at Munich Security Conference – After Voting for Partial Shutdown of DHS at Home

US lawmakers recently attended the Munich Security Conference shortly after voting for a partial government shutdown that affects the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). This has raised concerns about their priorities regarding national security.

• Politicians, including Lindsey Graham and Dick Blumenthal, met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the Munich Security Conference.

• The conference took place after Democrats voted for a partial government shutdown, opting not to fund DHS amidst ongoing border security issues.

• Critics argue that lawmakers should prioritize ensuring national security at home instead of seeking funding for foreign engagements, criticizing the apparent contradiction in their actions.

• Zelensky attended the conference to request additional financial support to continue Ukraine's defense against Russia.

• The presence of US politicians at the conference, despite national security funding debates, has sparked frustration among some constituents who feel these officials aren't addressing pressing homeland issues.

The juxtaposition of lawmakers' attendance at an international security gathering with their decision to underfund DHS highlights ongoing tensions in US political priorities, particularly concerning national security. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/us-lawmakers-shmooze-zelensky-munich-security-conference-after/ 

New Gold Standard: No Central Bank Required

 The concept of an individual gold standard is gaining traction due to recent advancements in tokenized gold. This idea allows individuals to anchor their financial activities to gold without needing government policies or central bank intervention.

1. Individual Participation: People can now utilize a gold-linked balance sheet similar to traditional stacking of gold, thus achieving personal monetary sovereignty.

2. Tokenized Gold Functionality: Tokenized gold products like PAX Gold (PAXG) and Tether Gold (XAUt) offer features such as price tracking stability, resilience during market stress, and financial integration comparable to existing financial infrastructures.

3. Historical Context: Unlike past systems that necessitated government action for gold convertibility, modern tokenized systems allow for personal choice regarding currency tied to gold.

4. Custodial and Regulatory Considerations: While there are risks related to custodians and regulatory environments, individuals can engage with tokenized assets without waiting for legislative frameworks.

5. Technical Analysis: Research shows that tokenized gold maintains a consistent price relationship with physical gold, ensuring that it can act as a reliable store of value.

6. Market Dynamics: The study indicates that the trading volume of tokenized gold increased significantly between 2023 and 2025, showcasing its growing acceptance in the market.

7. Potential Advantages: This new layer of digital gold allows users to use gold as collateral, which could appeal to investors looking to diversify their assets.

8. Emerging Financial Systems: The existence of tokenized gold reflects a shift towards optional monetary systems that can operate independently of state-controlled mechanisms.

Tokenized gold offers individuals the opportunity to define their financial paths by opting into a gold-referenced system. This shift might lead to a new form of monetary sovereignty, where personal choice and market dynamics create a parallel system reflecting elements of the historical gold standard while adapting to modern technology and financial needs. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2026-02-15/new-gold-standard-no-central-bank-required

Hillary Clinton Breaks With Party Line, Admits Mass Migration Is "Disruptive & Destabilizing"

 Hillary Clinton, former U. S. Secretary of State, made significant comments regarding mass migration during a panel discussion at the Munich Security Conference.

• Clinton referred to the influx of illegal immigrants as "destabilizing" to society, acknowledging that it has "gone too far."

• She emphasized the need for a debate on migration, and highlighted the importance of humane solutions that ensure secure borders and strong family structures.

• Clinton’s remarks contrast with her party's typical stance on immigration, which may have upset some Democrats, especially those opposed to her views.

• Earlier at the conference, Marco Rubio stressed the need for stronger Western unity and condemned mass migration as an "existential threat" to allies.

• The discussion reflects growing concerns among some politicians about immigration's impact on the political landscape, with calls for initiatives like the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act to protect electoral integrity.

Clinton's acknowledgment of the challenges posed by mass migration marks a notable shift in discourse, as both sides of the political spectrum grapple with its implications for society and governance.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/hillary-clinton-breaks-party-line-calls-mass-migration-destabilizing

The Biggest Bait-and-Switch War Of The Century

 U. S. government misled the public into believing Iraq was involved in the 9/11 attacks, ultimately justifying the invasion of Iraq. It highlights key evidence and arguments that were disregarded by the Bush administration to support this narrative.

1. Misrepresentation of 9/11: The U. S. government falsely portrayed Iraq and Saddam Hussein as responsible for the September 11 attacks, while substantial evidence pointed to Saudi Arabia's involvement.

2. Suppressed Evidence: A significant investigative report containing evidence linking Saudi officials to the hijackers was suppressed by the Bush administration, undermining their justification for the Iraq War.

3. False Claims and Justifications: The Bush administration claimed ties between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda, despite no credible proof. President Bush often implied links between Iraq and the 9/11 attacks, which influenced public opinion despite the lack of evidence.

4. Manipulation of Public Sentiment: Early in the aftermath of 9/11, few Americans believed Iraq was responsible for the attacks. However, as the administration disseminated the narrative, public perception shifted dramatically, with many believing Saddam had a direct role in 9/11.

5. Military and Intelligence Reports: U. S. intelligence agencies consistently found no evidence linking Iraq to the attacks; however, this information was overshadowed by political motives.

6. Impact of Propaganda: Both the public and military personnel were bombarded with propaganda that connected Iraq to terrorism, contributing to misunderstanding the purpose of the war and leading to civilian casualties.

7. Consequences of the War: The invasion and subsequent conflict resulted in vast humanitarian losses and further entangled the U. S. in ongoing military actions in the region.

8. Reflection on Accountability: The article underscores a lack of accountability for President Bush and Vice President Cheney despite the propagation of false narratives that led to widespread destruction and loss of life in Iraq.

9. Current Perspective: The author notes a growing skepticism among the American public about military interventions, questioning if future administrations will employ similar tactics to justify new conflicts.

The misleading portrayal of Iraq's involvement in 9/11 and the subsequent invasion highlight significant failures in political accountability and the role of propaganda in shaping public perception. The lessons learned from these events remain relevant as debates continue regarding U. S. military actions abroad and the potential for future conflicts driven by political agendas. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/biggest-bait-and-switch-war-century

Nobody Trusts Elections -- That’s the Crisis

 American electoral politics today is the widespread distrust of election integrity among voters. This skepticism affects both major political parties and has grown over time, leading to concerns about the legitimacy of the electoral process.

1. Widespread Distrust:

A recent poll indicated that 62% of likely voters are worried that cheating could affect election outcomes, signaling a loss of trust in the system, which spans across party lines.

2. Cycle of Accusations:

Historically, when a party loses, it often claims the election was rigged. This occurred with Democrats questioning George W. Bush's victories in 2000 and 2004, while Republicans regard the 2020 election as compromised.

3. Need for Reform:

The core issue is not who wins, but whether Americans believe in the electoral process's legitimacy. Transparency and consistent rules are vital to restoring trust. However, political leaders often dismiss these concerns rather than address them.

4. Comparisons with Other Democracies:

The U. S. election process can span weeks, with results delayed, which contrasts sharply with other developed democracies where counting occurs swiftly. This prolonged uncertainty can lead to suspicion and conspiracy theories.

5. Proposed Changes:

The SAVE America Act, which has bipartisan support, aims to enhance election integrity by ensuring only U. S. citizens can vote and advocating for measures like one-day voting and same-day counting.

6. Voter ID Debate:

Support for voter ID laws is high across the political spectrum, yet criticism of these measures often relies on misguided assumptions about certain demographic capabilities.

7. Foreign Interference:

Concerns about foreign meddling in elections should warrant scrutiny and should not be dismissed. Continuous vigilance against such threats is crucial for national security.

8. The Urgency of the Situation:

If significant portions of the populace believe elections are rigged unless their side wins, the social contract is at risk. Improving the election system should be a bipartisan priority to ensure that losing is not perceived as losing one’s voice.

A republic that fails to earn its citizens' trust jeopardizes its fundamental democracy. Transparent and effective electoral processes are essential to mitigate doubt and improve public confidence, ensuring that every election is viewed as a fair contest rather than a battleground for accusations.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/02/nobody_trusts_elections_that_s_the_crisis.html

Our Clinton Nightmare Comes to a Franken End

 The article discusses the political decline of Bill and Hillary Clinton, referencing a process called "Frankenization. " This term refers to how the Democratic Party discards individuals once they are no longer deemed useful or a liability.

1. Concept of Frankenization:

Frankenization refers to the way the Democratic Party ostracizes individuals who lose their political usefulness. The term is derived from Al Franken's political downfall and reflects a broader pattern within the party.

2. Historical Context:

The article reflects on the "Me Too" movement and how Democrats have sometimes used accusations as political weapons. It mentions the contrasting treatment of Donald Trump and Al Franken, with Franken ultimately being pushed out due to allegations against him.

3. Clintons' Perceived Immunity:

The Clintons, initially thought to be safe, are now facing potential downfall due to the resurfacing of associations with Jeffrey Epstein. The article suggests that the release of Epstein-related documents has made the Clintons vulnerable to scrutiny.

4. Karma and Political Utility:

The author argues that the Clintons are no longer of any political utility to Democrats, as they have a history of losing major elections and face ongoing controversies. This shift in perception echoes the treatment of other political figures who have fallen from grace.

5. Congressional Scrutiny:

Bill Clinton is reportedly facing congressional subpoenas to discuss his past with Epstein. The article hints that even former allies within the party are distancing themselves, suggesting that the Clintons are becoming politically irrelevant.

6. Outlook for Bill and Hillary:

The narrative concludes that the Clintons are now more useful as scapegoats than as political figures. Their continued relevance is being questioned, and they could soon join a group of former politicians who have lost their influence.

The article posits that Bill and Hillary Clinton are on the verge of political extinction, as the Democratic Party moves to distance itself from them in light of new controversies and changing political utility. The process of Frankenization appears to be underway, indicating a shift towards irrelevance for the Clintons in modern politics. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/02/our_clinton_nightmare_comes_to_a_franken_end.html

Sen. Rand Paul unveils bill to end nationwide liability protections for vaccine manufacturers

 Senator Rand Paul introduced a new bill aimed at ending the liability protections for vaccine manufacturers. This proposal seeks to hold pharmaceutical companies more accountable for potential vaccine-related injuries.

• Bill Overview: The legislation aims to repeal federal liability protections that have been in place for 40 years under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.

• Accountability: If passed, the bill would allow individuals to sue vaccine manufacturers if they believe they were harmed by vaccines.

• Support and Referral: The bill is co-sponsored by Senator Mike Lee and has been sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions for further consideration.

• Current Protections: Currently, vaccine manufacturers are mostly protected from lawsuits, and claims of vaccine injuries are typically processed through a federal compensation program.

• Adverse Events: Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicates millions of adverse event reports linked to vaccines. However, previous studies suggest that many adverse events go unreported.

Senator Paul's legislation highlights concerns over vaccine safety and aims to change how vaccine-related injuries are addressed legally in the United States, aiming for increased accountability from pharmaceutical companies. 

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/sen-rand-paul-unveils-bill-aimed-ending-nationwide-liability-protections

Election 2026: California Republicans Have a Chance

 California Republicans, who have struggled for years to gain power in a predominantly Democratic state, see a potential opportunity in the upcoming 2026 gubernatorial election. Recent trends indicate a shift in voter sentiment that could favor Republican candidates in a unique electoral landscape.

1. Historical Context:

• Republicans have not held the governor's office in California since 2010 and have faced diminishing presence in state politics.

• Notable failures include Meg Whitman’s unsuccessful bid in 2010 despite significant financial backing and Trump’s polarizing influence on the party after 2016.

2. Recent Electoral Trends:

• California Republicans are now witnessing unexpected victories, including flipping two assembly seats in traditionally Democratic areas.

• The Hispanic voter base appears to be shifting towards Republican candidates, signaling a potential change in traditional voting patterns.

3. Voter Sentiment Shifts:

• Voters are expressing dissatisfaction with "woke" ideologies and have successfully recalled officials promoting these ideas in multiple districts, including major cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco.

• The passage of Proposition 36 reflects a desire for stricter policies on crime and a rejection of leniency in certain legal areas.

4. Unique Electoral System:

• California employs a blanket jungle primary system where the top two candidates, regardless of their political party, advance to the general election. Current polls show two Republican candidates, Sheriff Chad Bianco and Steve Hilton, leading.

5. Democratic Party Fragmentation:

• The Democratic Party in California is experiencing substantial fragmentation, with multiple candidates vying for the governorship, leading to divisions among their voters.

• Democratic frontrunners represent various identity groups, straining the party's traditional cohesion.

6. Future Implications:

• If the two Republican candidates maintain their standings, they could capitalize on the fragmented Democratic voter base to secure significant primary wins.

• Despite the challenges posed by a Democrat-controlled legislature, a Republican governor may still influence future elections and legislative dynamics.

California Republicans may have a real chance to revitalize their party’s presence in the state with the upcoming election. By focusing on practical issues and appealing to a broadening voter base, there is potential for a Republican resurgence. The political landscape is undeniably complex, but with the current trends favoring change, the election could yield unexpected results that challenge the status quo in California politics. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/02/16/election-2026-california-republicans-have-a-chance/

Epstein Sex Trafficking Immigration Fraud Linked to Top Obama Officials

 The connections between Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender, and former officials in the Obama administration. It highlights specific individuals involved and raises questions about potential misconduct.

• Jeffrey Epstein's Influence: Epstein had significant connections that may have enabled him to evade justice for his crimes.

• Kathryn Ruemmler: The former White House counsel for Obama resigned from her Wall Street position due to her links to Epstein. Before this, Ruemmler was reportedly in discussions with Epstein about a potential attorney general position.

• Immigration Fraud Links: Epstein was involved in helping his girlfriend, Karyna Shuliak, with immigration issues. There is evidence that he sought assistance from his network, including Greg Craig, another high-level Obama adviser.

• Craig's Role: Greg Craig, formerly in a significant legal role during the Obama administration, was implicated in communication regarding helping Epstein with immigration fraud. It was suggested that he had connections to the highest level of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS).

• Sex Trafficking Concerns: The article raises the alarm that Epstein's actions, including securing visas for individuals linked to his sex trafficking activities, may have involved high-ranking officials in the Obama administration.

• Media Coverage: The author criticizes media portrayal of these events, arguing that if similar connections were found with Trump officials, the media would explore these links more rigorously. Significant attention is drawn to the idea that connections between Epstein and Obama officials are downplayed.

The relationships between Epstein and certain Obama administration officials raise serious concerns about potential complicity in his illegal activities. There is a call for proper media scrutiny of these connections and the implications they carry for those involved. The investigation into how deep these ties go continues to prompt crucial questions regarding accountability and transparency.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/epstein-sex-trafficking-immigration-fraud-linked-to-top-obama-officials/

The Decline of Trust in the News

 Modern journalism faces significant challenges, primarily due to journalists themselves. Bias and poor reporting lead to widespread distrust among the public. While these issues are important, they do not encompass the entirety of journalism's failures.

1. Historical Context: Eric Burns illustrates in his book, "Infamous Scribblers," that even during the founding of America, journalism struggled with credibility. George Washington referred to reporters as “infamous scribblers,” highlighting long-standing issues.

2. Perception of Reliability: In the past, particularly the 1960s and 70s, many believed journalism was reliable. However, political bias has always existed and has increased over time.

3. Role of Journalists: Reporters should objectively present facts without infusing personal opinions. They ought to maintain a critical stance towards the government.

4. Media Bias: Major news outlets, including ABC, NBC, and CBS, often take sides on political issues, undermining their role as unbiased informers. For example, a study found that 92% of news stories about President Trump were negative in the initial months of his second term.

5. Intellectual Laziness: Reporters often show intellectual laziness, conforming to prevailing narratives in newsrooms. The pressure to compete for viewership promotes sensationalism and “click bait” journalism.

6. Declining Popularity of Print Media: Newspapers are losing readership, with many relying on social media, which often spreads misinformation.

7. Importance of Good Reporting: Effective journalism requires excellent editing and a focus on fundamental reporting questions. However, journalism education does not always emphasize these skills effectively.

Despite historical issues and ongoing biases, the core challenge remains: ensuring journalists adhere to rigorous reporting standards and maintain objectivity to regain public trust. The market dynamics dictate improvements in journalism, but solutions are complex and not guaranteed. 

https://spectator.org/the-decline-of-trust-in-the-news/

Redistricting Betrayal in Virginia

 Virginia's voters previously amended the state constitution to eliminate partisan gerrymandering through the Virginia Redistricting Commission (VRC). However, recent actions by the Democratic-controlled legislature have raised concerns about potential manipulation of the redistricting process.

• Referendum Background: Five years ago, two-thirds of Virginia voters supported a measure to remove redistricting from politicians and place it in the hands of the VRC, aimed at preventing partisan gerrymandering.

• Democratic Maneuvering: After gaining legislative control, Democrats pushed to amend the constitution again, allowing mid-decade redraws of congressional districts, potentially undermining voters' intentions.

• Legal Developments: Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley blocked this new plan, but the Virginia Supreme Court lifted the injunction without addressing the issues of the case. This ruling came just before important elections.

• Consequences: If the new map is enforced, Virginia may shift to having a congressional delegation with 10 Democrats and 1 Republican, likely impacting future elections.

• Upcoming Vote: Voters must decide on April 21 whether to allow the General Assembly to adopt new congressional districts temporarily, which raises questions about the integrity of redistricting.

The situation in Virginia highlights tensions between legislative actions and the will of the voters regarding redistricting. As the state faces critical decisions, the judicial response and public opinion will play significant roles in determining the future of fair representation. 

https://spectator.org/redistricting-betrayal-in-virginia/

Sales-Tax Escalator

 Sales tax rates in the United States have been steadily increasing, impacting consumers and raising questions about affordability. Unlike property and income taxes, sales taxes have rarely faced organized opposition, leading to their continuous rise over the past century. This article explores the historical context, recent trends, and implications of sales tax increases, examining their effects on consumers and potential policy solutions.

1. Sales Tax Overview

• Sales taxes are levied by states and local governments and have become a primary source of revenue.

• First imposed during the Great Depression, these taxes began at low rates but have risen significantly over the decades.

• Today, general sales taxes and selective taxes on certain goods (e.g., alcohol, cigarettes) represent the largest revenue source for state and local governments.

2. Historical Trends

• Sales taxes started at low rates but have increased over time due to budgetary needs and inflation.

• The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair allowed states to collect sales tax on online purchases, greatly expanding sales tax revenues.

• States are now taking in nearly $700 billion annually from sales taxes, with substantial portions coming from new online tax rules.

3. Consumer Behavior and Resistance

• High sales taxes have driven consumers to seek lower-tax states like New Hampshire, where there is no sales tax.

• Many consumers are required to pay use tax on out-of-state purchases, but compliance is generally low.

4. Complexity and Exemptions

• Sales taxes are complicated; approximately 60% of sales go untaxed, leading to higher rates on the taxed goods.

• There are numerous exemptions for specific goods and services, adding complexity to the tax system and often favoring certain groups or industries.

5. Challenges of Regressivity

• Critics argue that sales taxes are regressive, disproportionately affecting low-income individuals.

• Despite this, there is support for increasing local sales taxes to fund various political agendas, such as social services and transportation.

6. Recent Local Initiatives

• Many cities and counties have passed new sales taxes to fund initiatives, primarily in healthcare and homelessness, without necessarily demonstrating effectiveness.

• New taxes are often justified on the grounds of funding specific services, but the actual allocation of funds may differ from initial promises.

7. Policy Suggestions

• Experts advocate for a broader tax base with lower rates, suggesting that states tax more services and reduce overall tax rates.

• Some regions, like Washington, D. C., have successfully expanded their sales tax to include services while also lowering other taxes.

8. The Political Landscape

• Although sales taxes are a significant burden on consumers, political focus often shifts toward other tax types or new consumer taxes.

• Efforts to reduce or reform sales taxes are limited, reflecting a disconnect between voters' calls for lower living costs and legislative action.

The steady rise of sales tax rates, compounded by economic pressures such as inflation, poses a growing burden on consumers. Despite its potential to raise significant revenue, the sales tax system's complexity and perceived regressivity call for re-evaluation. Policymakers need to address the impact of sales taxes on affordability and consider reforms that could alleviate financial strain on consumers while still meeting revenue needs. As political attention remains divided, significant challenges lie ahead in balancing tax structures with public demands for economic relief. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/state-sales-tax-cost-inflation

Wyoming Moves to Pull the Plug on Costly Pronghorn and Sidewinder Wind Projects

 Recent decisions by Wyoming's State Board of Land Commissioners have put the future of two significant wind energy projects, Pronghorn H2 and Sidewinder, in jeopardy. The board voted 3-2 to begin the process of canceling these leases amid public opposition and a recent court ruling that invalidated another lease associated with these projects.

1. Background of Projects:

• The Pronghorn H2 Clean Energy Project was planned as a combined wind and solar facility, with a focus on producing hydrogen on approximately 46,000 acres in Converse County.

• Sidewinder, a related wind project in Niobrara County, was intended to work alongside Pronghorn and originally linked to clean hydrogen production.

2. Court Ruling:

• A December 2025 court ruling by Judge F. Scott Peasley deemed a state land lease for the Pronghorn project unlawful, stating it did not stipulate that electricity from the wind farm would be used to supply the grid, violating state rules.

3. Public Opposition:

• The board's decision followed extensive public comments expressing concerns about the projects, leading to their reevaluation and potential cancellation.

4. Current Developments:

• Focus Clean Energy, the company behind Pronghorn and Sidewinder, announced a reduction in the project's footprint from over 57,000 acres to about 16,571 acres and removed the hydrogen production aspect altogether. The company believes these changes will address community concerns.

5. Legal Battle Ahead:

• Despite the board's decision, Focus Clean Energy plans to continue legal efforts to reinstate its wind lease, expressing confidence that it will prevail in the state’s top court.

6. Environmental Impact:

• The cancellations are seen as positive news for local wildlife, particularly birds like eagles and hawks, which are often adversely affected by wind farms.

7. Local Sentiments:

• Many residents in Wyoming have expressed relief over the board's decision, as they were largely against the wind projects, citing concerns about their reliability and suitability in Wyoming’s climate.

Wyoming's move to potentially cancel the Pronghorn H2 and Sidewinder wind projects highlights ongoing tensions between the development of renewable energy and community concerns about environmental impact and project viability. The upcoming legal challenges and community reactions will shape the energy landscape in Wyoming moving forward. 

https://legalinsurrection.com/2026/02/wyoming-moves-to-pull-the-plug-on-costly-pronghorn-and-sidewinder-wind-projects/

John Fetterman, The Last Moderate Democrat

The Democratic Party has shifted significantly from past leaders like Presidents Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy, who represented a more centrist approach. This summary discusses the radicalization of the party, particularly since the 2000s, and highlights the views of current politicians.

• Historical Context: The party once collaborated with Republicans, exemplified by the “Blue Dogs” in the 1980s who helped pass tax cuts under Reagan. Additionally, Bill Clinton worked with Newt Gingrich to achieve budget surpluses in the 1990s.

• Radical Shift: Al Gore's candidacy in 2000 marked the beginning of the party's leftward shift. This trend continued with Barack Obama's nomination in 2008, despite his limited experience.

• Current Leadership: Today's leading Democratic candidates for the 2028 election, such as Governor Gavin Newsom and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, are viewed as far-left, and the party is now primarily focused on opposing Donald Trump.

• Trump Derangement Syndrome: Many Democrats exhibit strong reactions against Trump, often claiming he poses a threat to democracy, despite the U. S. being a constitutional republic. This has led to extreme rhetoric about Republicans.

• Common Sense Voice: Senator John Fetterman is highlighted as a moderate Democrat who does not conform to extreme views within his party. He supports issues like funding for the Department of Homeland Security and voter identification laws, demonstrating a more centrist stance.

The Democratic Party's radicalization has shifted away from its collaborative history, focusing on partisan opposition rather than bipartisan solutions. While many leaders embrace extreme leftist perspectives, Senator Fetterman stands out as a figure with more moderate views and a willingness to critique his party.

https://canadafreepress.com/article/john-fetterman-the-last-moderate-democrat 

Nancy Pelosi Aiming to Push Gavin Newsom for 2028

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is reportedly advocating for California Governor Gavin Newsom to be the Democratic nominee for President in 2028. This push comes from their longstanding collaboration and her strong support for him.

• Sources indicate that Pelosi has been promoting Newsom quietly within the Democratic Party.

• Pelosi has a significant donor network, which could benefit Newsom’s campaign.

• She has expressed admiration for Newsom's leadership style during the Trump administration, emphasizing his "defiance and charm. "

• A former aide described Pelosi as a “Gavin fan-girl,” highlighting her confidence in his abilities.

• Pelosi has called Newsom "masterful" in terms of leadership, vision, and issue knowledge.

• Newsom’s spokesperson praised Pelosi as a model of public service, acknowledging her influential role in politics.

Pelosi's backing of Newsom suggests a strategic move within the Democratic Party as the 2028 presidential election approaches, with both leaders showcasing a shared vision and values in their political endeavors. 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/02/15/report-nancy-pelosi-aiming-push-gavin-newsom-2028/ 

Sunday, February 15, 2026

Pam Bondi Announces ALL Epstein-Related Materials Released — Pelosi, Obama, Newsom, Biden and Other Democrats Named in Files — HERE IS the Complete List of 300+ Individuals

 On February 15, 2026, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has released all materials related to Jeffrey Epstein under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. This decision names over 300 individuals associated with Epstein, including prominent Democrats.

1. Full Release Confirmation:

• The DOJ, in a report sent to key congressional leaders, confirmed the release of all documents and materials related to Epstein.

• The report asserts that no records were withheld or redacted for reasons of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.

2. Categories of Released Materials:

• The released documents cover nine specific categories:

• Investigations and prosecutions of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

• Flight logs, travel records, and itineraries involving Epstein.

• Names of individuals linked to Epstein’s criminal activities and any related legal agreements.

• Information about entities in connection with Epstein’s trafficking and financial networks.

• Internal communications within the DOJ regarding prosecution decisions.

• Documentation concerning Epstein’s detention and death.

3. Redaction Details:

• The government clarified that redactions were limited to sensitive information such as:

• Victim personal and medical data.

• Content that could affect ongoing investigations.

• Graphic images of death or abuse.

• No classification-based redactions were applied.

4. High-Profile Names Released:

• The list of individuals associated with the Epstein files includes high-profile figures such as Barack and Michelle Obama, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and others.

• The DOJ stated these individuals were named because their names appear in the released documents across various contexts.

5. Public and Political Implications:

• The announcement has sparked significant political conversation, with suggestions that the release may have negative implications for many Democrats.

• The situation has led to claims that former President Donald Trump has been vindicated regarding his historical accusations related to Epstein.

The DOJ's full release of Epstein-related materials has intensified public interest and political scrutiny, especially concerning the involvement of many leading political figures. The implications of these revelations may alter public perception and political dynamics as more information becomes accessible and analyzed.

List of names here:  https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/bombshell-pam-bondi-announces-all-epstein-related-materials/

FAA Mandates Airlines to Affirm Merit Hiring for Pilots

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has introduced a new rule that requires all U. S. commercial airlines to adopt merit-based hiring practices for pilots. This decision, communicated by the Department of Transportation (DOT) on February 13, aims to eliminate hiring based on race and gender.

• Mandatory Compliance: Airlines must certify the end of hiring pilots based on race and sex or risk federal investigations.

• Quotes from Officials: DOT Secretary Sean P. Duffy stated that public confidence in pilots should be based on their qualifications, not on personal characteristics.

• Background on DEI Policies: Despite the FAA's efforts to raise performance standards and eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) positions, allegations of biased hiring practices persist.

• Trump Administration's Influence: The new rules stem from President Trump’s executive orders aimed at dismantling race- and sex-based preferences in hiring, labeling them as harmful to civil rights.

• Safety Focus: The DOT emphasizes that aviation safety relies heavily on the competencies of crew members. As such, hiring practices should prioritize qualifications over demographics.

• Historical Context: The rule follows a tragic incident in January 2025, where a plane crash attributed to DEI hiring was highlighted by Trump.

The FAA's new rule mandates that commercial airlines adopt merit-based hiring to ensure qualified pilots prioritize aviation safety over demographic considerations, responding to ongoing allegations regarding discriminatory hiring practices. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/faa-mandates-airlines-to-affirm-merit-hiring-for-pilots-5985586?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge

Democrat Officials Discard Americans as Collateral Damage

An investigative report highlights the dire conditions faced by residents in a condominium complex in Prince George's County, Maryland. The area, which heavily supported Democrats, has been plagued by crime and homeless encampments. This situation serves as a stark warning about the potential repercussions of current Democratic policies.

• Current State of the Community: The residents of the condominium complex have been subjected to serious issues, including a homeless encampment that has turned into a drug market. Local Democrats have allowed this situation to persist, leading to significant property damage and crime.

• Living Conditions: Residents now navigate through hazardous conditions, facing break-ins, drug use, and the presence of gangs. Essential services like heat and electricity have been disrupted, and many units are declared unlivable.

• Government Response: Instead of addressing the problems stemming from the encampment and crime, local government officials are evicting homeowners who no longer have access to basic necessities. Officials have shown unwillingness to intervene against criminals while expressing a misguided sense of compassion for the "unhoused. "

• Consequences for Residents: Many homeowners have had to deal with vandalism, property damage, and threats from homeless individuals and gangs. Despite attempts to seek protection from the police, residents feel abandoned, with officials focused more on penalizing the homeowners rather than the criminals.

• Broader Implications: This scenario reflects a pattern in Democrat policies nationwide, where communities in Democrat-run areas are seeing increased crime rates and bureaucratic failures. This is exemplified by actions taken against law enforcement and proposals by legislators that endanger community safety.

The report underscores how Democrats are willing to sacrifice the well-being of their most loyal voters to support their policies. With midterm elections approaching, the situation presents a critical test for American voters, as it appears that elected officials prioritize ideology over the safety and stability of communities. The residents of Prince George’s County serve as a cautionary tale regarding the consequences of unchecked political agendas. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/02/democrat_officials_discard_americans_as_collateral_damage.html

From Chuck To AOC, Here Are The Worst People Of The Week

Key political discussions and critiques from the week, focusing on prominent figures and issues within American politics. The content highlights criticisms directed at various Democrats and some Republican figures concerning legislation and policies.

1. Criticism of Chuck Schumer: Chuck Schumer, Senate Minority Leader, has been accused of making exaggerated comparisons between voter ID laws and historical discrimination practices like Jim Crow laws. Critics note that most Americans support voter ID regulations, indicating Schumer's stance may not align with public opinion.

2. Senator Lisa Murkowski’s Opposition: Senator Murkowski of Alaska is highlighted for her opposition to election integrity measures, being characterized as a "Republican in name only" (RINO) due to her siding with Democratic views instead of Republican principles.

3. Mitch McConnell's Influence: Senator Mitch McConnell faces criticism for his alleged alignment with the military-industrial complex and his resistance to the SAVE America Act, which is intended to secure voter integrity. His perceived motivations are linked to personal financial interests and opposition to former President Trump.

4. Controversial Actions by Governor Andy Beshear: Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear vetoed legislation to protect women’s restrooms and restrict medical procedures for children, with his decisions being criticized for aligning with radical left views.

5. Threats by Congressman Shri Thanedar: Rep. Shri Thanedar from Michigan threatened to prosecute Trump administration officials if Democrats regain power, showcasing a willingness to use legal measures politically against opponents.

6. Eric Swalwell's Claims: Rep. Eric Swalwell delivered misleading accusations against immigration officials regarding child welfare, while immigration officers defended their actions as protective rather than harmful.

7. AOC's Foreign Policy Appearance: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez attended an international security conference in Munich, criticized for her simplistic approach and focus on partisan attacks rather than substantive discussions on policy.

8. Olympic Skier Breezy Johnson: Olympic skier Breezy Johnson publicly declared her bisexuality, prompting critique over the relevance of personal identity disclosures in athletic competitions.

The commentary presents a critique of several political figures and events, particularly focusing on perceived hypocrisy among Democrats and contentious relationships within the Republican Party. The document highlights the ongoing political debate surrounding voter ID laws, social issues related to children, and personal identity in public forums. 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/02/14/from-chuck-to-aoc-here-are-the-worst-people-of-the-week/

Key political voice in Georgia urges state to take over Fulton County elections after FBI raid

 Georgia state Senator Greg Dolezal is advocating for the state government to temporarily manage Fulton County elections. This call-to-action follows recent developments, including an FBI raid that raised concerns about the integrity of the 2020 election ballots in the county.

• Election Integrity Concerns: Dolezal, a Republican and a candidate for lieutenant governor, argues that Fulton County's election processes have serious issues, including outdated voter rolls with individuals listed as being born in 1900 and registrations at inappropriate locations, such as parking lots and closed shelters.

• Legal Framework: In 2021, Georgia passed a law allowing the state election board to take over election management if a county fails to comply with state law. Dolezal emphasizes that Fulton County has demonstrated this incapacity.

• FBI Investigation: Recent revelations from the FBI highlighted several irregularities in vote counting during the 2020 election in Fulton County. An affidavit provided by FBI Special Agent Hugh Raymond Evans details issues such as missing scanned images of counted ballots, duplication of ballot images, inconsistent vote tallies, and problems with absentee ballots.

• Accountability and Action: Dolezal has engaged with colleagues in the legislature, who are starting to back his proposal. He hopes to bring the discussion to the state election board in upcoming meetings to address these irregularities promptly.

• Past Allegations: The FBI's affidavit references past concerns reported by Just the News regarding confusion and mistakes in vote counting oversight by the Georgia Secretary of State's office during the 2020 election.

Senator Dolezal's proposition to have the state take operational control over Fulton County's elections aims to ensure that future elections are conducted fairly and lawfully. As Fulton County is significant for Georgia's electoral landscape, decisive action is being sought to resolve issues identified through ongoing investigations. The conversation around this takeover is evolving, with potential implications for the upcoming elections in 2026 and beyond.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/monkey-political-voice-georgia-urges-state-take-over-fulton-county

How Deep Is the Deep State?

 Roger Kimball explores the concept of the "deep state," characterizing it as a hidden and powerful network within the government that manipulates political outcomes to maintain its influence. He uses various metaphors and historical references to illustrate its complexity and challenges in dismantling it.

1. Nature of the Deep State:

• Kimball likens the deep state to both an onion and a basement with many layers, suggesting that every time one layer is exposed or removed, more layers are discovered.

• He compares it to the Lernaean Hydra, a mythical monster that grows back two heads for every one cut off, illustrating the deep state’s resilience and ability to adapt.

2. Resistance to Exposure:

• The author emphasizes that revelations about the deep state often fail to lead to meaningful public condemnation, primarily due to media manipulation, which tends to support the established narrative instead of challenging it.

• He references specific cases, such as the fraudulent practices observed in the 2020 elections, to demonstrate how the deep state deflects attention away from its misdeeds.

3. Political Dynamics and Accountability:

• Kimball discusses how the deep state actively works to undermine political figures who threaten its existence, citing the smear campaign against Tulsi Gabbard and the political maneuvers surrounding the Trump administration.

• He highlights the involvement of prominent figures, including former President Obama and various intelligence leaders, in attempts to delegitimize Trump’s presidency.

4. Efforts to Combat the Deep State:

• The article stresses the importance of initiatives such as the SAVE Act, which requires proof of citizenship for voter registration, viewing it as a critical step in curbing the deep state’s ability to manipulate elections.

• Trump’s approach is characterized as patient and strategic, using legal and political tools to counteract deep state efforts.

5. Cultural and Mythological References:

• Kimball references J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter series to describe how the deep state resembles Voldemort, suggesting that its leaders have infused parts of their power into various institutions, making it difficult to eradicate.

• He asserts that conventional methods will not suffice to combat the deep state, likening the required solutions to those found in mythology, such as the need for Basilisk venom to destroy a Horcrux.

6. Hope and Future Prospects:

• Despite the deep state’s insidious nature, Kimball expresses optimism that with persistent efforts and the right approach, it can be dismantled.

• He proffers that the future of the republic acutely depends on successful actions taken to expose and dismantle the deep state.

Roger Kimball’s exploration of the deep state presents a complex and layered challenge embedded in the political landscape. Through vivid metaphors and historical references, he conveys the depth and resilience of this powerful network while advocating for strategic actions to combat its influence. Ultimately, he believes that with the right commitment and effort, significant progress can be made in holding the deep state accountable and preserving the integrity of democracy.

https://amgreatness.com/2026/02/15/how-deep-is-the-deep-state/

Democrats Paid Kamala $6.5M a Few Months Ago

 The potential for Kamala Harris to be the Democratic nominee for the 2028 presidential election. This follows significant financial backing from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and a shift in public perception.

1. Rumors of Nomination: There is speculation about Kamala Harris being a frontrunner for the 2028 nomination, particularly after a successful book tour and reduced blame for the Democrats' 2024 defeat.

2. Polls and Popularity: Some polls show Harris doing well among Democratic voters, despite skepticism about their accuracy so far ahead of the election.

3. Demographics: Harris appears to connect well with young people and has gained popularity among black women, a crucial voting bloc in the Democratic Party.

4. DNC Support: The DNC's recent financial activities include a $6.5 million purchase of Harris’s old email list to support her new political group, Fight for the People PAC. This money primarily helped pay off her previous campaign debts.

5. Skepticism About Funding: There is doubt among party members about the necessity of the email list purchase, suggesting that the DNC may be showing favoritism toward Harris.

Overall, despite Harris's challenges, her support from the DNC and growing popularity could position her as a strong candidate for the 2028 presidential race. The internal dynamics within the party will be crucial in shaping this outcome.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/democrats-paid-kamala-6-5m-a-few-months-ago/

Democratic Socialists Are Trying to Trounce Democrats in the Primaries

 The political landscape in the U. S. is shifting, with democratic socialists gaining traction among voters and challenging established Democrats ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

• In 2018, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez shocked the political world by defeating long-time incumbent Joe Crowley in a Democratic primary.

• Nearly a decade later, more democratic socialists are poised to enter primary battles, potentially unseating old-guard Democrats.

• Nithya Raman, a city council member in Los Angeles, announced a primary campaign against Mayor Karen Bass, creating significant political tension.

• In Wisconsin, state representative Francesca Hong will run for governor, having garnered support from major socialist organizations.

• Former NYC comptroller Brad Lander is challenging Rep. Dan Goldman in New York, with endorsements from prominent democratic socialist figures.

• The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) has over 95,000 members, reflecting a growing acceptance of socialism within the Democratic Party.

• Recent surveys show a strong majority of Democratic voters favor democratic socialism, indicating a significant shift in political attitudes.

As the midterm elections approach, the rise of democratic socialists is reshaping the Democratic Party. This trend suggests an increase in challenges to established leaders, signaling an ideological shift that should not be overlooked.

https://spectator.org/democratic-socialists-are-trying-to-trounce-democrats-in-the-primaries/

We Told You So: EPA Was Wrong About CO2 From the Start

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recently revised its position on carbon dioxide (CO2), indicating a shift away from the narrative that has deemed it an existential threat. This change raises important questions about climate policy, regulations, and the economic implications for taxpayers and businesses.

1. Revised EPA Stance:

• The EPA has repealed its previous "endangerment finding," which classified CO2 as a significant environmental threat.

• This admission suggests that the claims about CO2’s dangers were politically motivated rather than scientifically sound.

2. Economic Impact of the Reversal:

• The repeal could eliminate over a trillion dollars in compliance costs associated with regulations on CO2 emissions.

• Families may see savings, particularly in the cost of vehicles and energy bills.

3. CO2's Role in the Environment:

• CO2 constitutes about 0.04% of the Earth's atmosphere and is essential for plant life.

• Historically, life has thrived during periods when CO2 levels were higher than today.

4. Critique of Regulatory Approaches:

• The article criticizes the push for carbon capture and sequestration projects, arguing they create new risks while failing to address actual problems.

• These projects involve compressing CO2 into concentrated forms and storing it underground, raising safety concerns.

5. Political and Economic Accountability:

• The author emphasizes the need for transparency regarding who bears the costs of these projects, questioning the necessity and safety of mandated carbon reduction technologies.

• He poses critical questions to energy companies about their motivations and the financial burdens placed on taxpayers.

6. Climate Policy and Global Context:

• While the U. S. is pressured to reduce its emissions, other countries, particularly China, continue to increase coal production, diluting efforts to address global climate change.

7. Call for Policy Change:

• The article advocates for an overhaul of current climate narratives, prioritizing affordable energy and genuine environmental protection over fear-based rhetoric and government subsidies.

The EPA's repeal of the endangerment finding marks a potential turning point in climate policy, where the need for honest discussions about CO2 and its role is paramount. It challenges previous assumptions that CO2 is harmful and opens avenues for a more balanced approach to energy and environmental management. The author calls for an end to corporate welfare in climate policy and urges for practical solutions that protect both the environment and public finances. 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2026/02/14/we-told-you-so-epa-was-wrong-about-co2-from-the-start/

Obama Allies Melt Down After Trump Trashes Landmark Climate Reg

On February 13, 2026, the Trump administration announced the repeal of a significant climate regulation known as the Endangerment Finding, which had been established during the Obama presidency. This decision, framed as a major deregulatory action by President Trump, is causing strong backlash among Democrats and climate activists who are concerned about its potential environmental impact.

1. Trump's Announcement:

• President Donald Trump described the repeal as the “largest deregulatory action in American history,” claiming it would reduce costs for consumers, particularly with new vehicles.

2. Democratic Response:

• Several Democratic leaders criticized the repeal, suggesting it would lead to increased pollution and harm public health. Former President Barack Obama stated that the lack of EPA regulation on greenhouse gases would make the country “less safe” and hinder efforts to combat climate change.

• Prominent figures, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom and former Vice President Al Gore, voiced strong opposition on social media, calling the action “lawless” and claiming it serves the fossil fuel industry rather than public health.

3. Court Challenges:

• Gov. Newsom announced California's intention to legally challenge the repeal, emphasizing the state's commitment to fighting against changes detrimental to environmental protections.

4. Dismantling Clean Vehicle Mandates:

• The repeal includes the elimination of a de facto national electric vehicle (EV) mandate, previously upheld by the Endangerment Finding. This decision followed congressional resolutions aimed at deregulating various environmental standards.

5. Criticism of Scientific Ignorance:

• Critics assert that the Trump administration is ignoring established scientific research linking climate change to public health issues. The dismissal of the Endangerment Finding is seen by many as a politically motivated action that prioritizes corporate interests over public welfare.

6. Allegations of Corruption:

• Some Democratic leaders accused the Trump administration of corruption, suggesting that the decision benefits wealthy donors and corporations at the expense of public health and the environment. They emphasized the economic and moral implications of allowing increased pollution.

7. Financial Implications:

• The Trump EPA estimated that repealing the Endangerment Finding could save taxpayers over $1 trillion, a claim that has been met with skepticism regarding the accuracy and motivations behind the data presented.

The repeal of the Endangerment Finding marks a significant shift in U. S. environmental policy under the Trump administration, prompting serious concerns from Democrats and environmental advocates. The potential consequences of increased pollution and health risks are critical issues that have fueled backlash and planned legal action from various states, notably California. The repeal is characterized by competing narratives regarding the balance between economic benefits and environmental responsibility. 

https://dailycaller.com/2026/02/13/obama-allies-melt-down-trump-zeldin-endangerment-finding-al-gore/

Canadian Political Hypocrites Sealing The Fate of Children The System Wants Transgendered

The expresses deep concern about the state of Canada and its political leaders regarding the protection of children, particularly in relation to transgender issues. A strong critique is directed at federal political parties and their actions.

• A video and pictures illustrate the failure of Canada’s leaders to protect children from being transgendered, highlighting distress over this issue, especially in young children.

• The author criticizes major political figures, including Pierre Poilievre of the Conservative Party and Mark Carney, for their alleged role in supporting policies that cause harm to children.

• There is a suggestion of hypocrisy among politicians who portray grief over these issues while reportedly supporting harmful practices.

• Influencer Liz Churchill is noted for being one of the few who openly discusses the troubling reality facing Canada, though she may face backlash for her views.

• The text expresses skepticism about the potential for change in the upcoming federal election, suggesting that voters will face the same choices and outcomes.

• It emphasizes a belief that current political leaders are complicit in harmful legislation, including euthanasia (MAID) and issues related to abortion and transgender policies.

• The piece concludes with a condemnation of the political situation, suggesting that there is little hope for positive change in the welfare of children and seniors in Canada.

The narrative conveys a sense of urgency and despair about the political landscape in Canada, criticizing leaders for their failure to safeguard vulnerable populations, particularly children. It reflects a strong call for awareness and accountability from politicians. 

https://canadafreepress.com/article/canadian-political-hypocrites-sealing-the-fate-of-children-the-system-wants-transgendered

Clinton Is Not Navarro: A Constitutional Distinction That Matters

Peter Navarro discusses the difference between the constitutional duties related to executive privilege for White House advisers and the legal obligations of private citizens in the context of congressional subpoenas. He argues against conflating these two situations, particularly in light of his own imprisonment and the discussions surrounding former President Bill Clinton.

• Distinction of Cases: Navarro highlights that comparing his situation with Bill Clinton's is inaccurate. Clinton was subpoenaed about private conduct, whereas Navarro faced a subpoena regarding his official work as a senior adviser.

• Executive Privilege: He emphasizes the importance of executive privilege, which protects the confidentiality of communications among high-level officials, essential for candid presidential decision-making. The Supreme Court supports this through the principle of separation of powers.

• Legal Precedence: Navarro references a long-standing Justice Department guidance that provides senior advisers with testimonial immunity in cases involving executive privilege disputes. He argues that criminal contempt in these scenarios risks undermining the presidency's independence.

• Chilling Effects: The potential consequence of normalizing criminal prosecutions over such disputes could deter advisers from speaking openly, fearing legal repercussions. This, he warns, could weaken the ability to provide honest advice to the president, damaging executive confidentiality.

• Judicial Resolution Needed: Navarro seeks judicial clarification on multiple constitutional questions regarding executive privilege and its invocation to ensure that future advisers do not face similar dilemmas.

Navarro concludes that the criminalization of unresolved executive privilege disputes poses a significant threat to the presidency and the quality of governance. If such issues are treated as criminal violations, it could lead to a precarious situation where future advisers must weigh legal risks against their roles in providing essential advice to the president. The outcome of Navarro's appeal may set crucial precedents for how executive privilege is understood and applied in the future. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/02/14/clinton-is-not-navarro-a-constitutional-distinction-that-matters/

Unite4Freedom Uncovers Massive Election Fraud in Colorado Where Votes Changed After Election Was Certified

 A new report by Unite4Freedom reveals significant changes to federal election records in Colorado after elections were certified, suggesting potential fraud and manipulation. This investigation raises serious questions about the integrity of the electoral process.

• Election Record Changes: Unite4Freedom's findings indicate that thousands of changes to voter history records occurred after the official certification of the 2020, 2022, and 2024 elections. These alterations were documented by comparing snapshots of the certified federal election records.

• Tina Peters' Case: Tina Peters, a former election official, is serving an excessive prison sentence for trying to preserve crucial election records, as she believed unlawful changes were made.

• Magnitude of Changes: The report shows over 300,000 changes in 2020 and more than 150,000 in 2022, with 3,416 changes noted in 2024. The report questions whether future audits might reveal even more extensive changes.

• Call for Investigation: Unite4Freedom urges for a comprehensive criminal investigation into these changes and calls for the release of Tina Peters while this investigation is ongoing.

• Impact of Fraud: The article warns that fraudulent elections lead to corruption and chaos, undermining democracy and harming the economy. It emphasizes the importance of valid elections as a constitutional guarantee.

Unite4Freedom's report raises alarming concerns about election integrity in Colorado, indicating that post-certification changes to voters' records may point to manipulation. The organization advocates for full accountability and a thorough investigation to uphold the electoral process.

https://joehoft.com/breaking-exclusive-unite4freedom-uncovers-massive-election-fraud-colorado/

Saturday, February 14, 2026

Stuck at the Bottom

Why South Carolina’s System Still Isn’t Working and How the Next Generation Might Finally Change It

By: Investigative Correspondent

For decades, South Carolina has promised reform, yet measurable progress remains elusive. Despite political turnover, tax incentives for corporations, and endless speeches about economic development, the Palmetto State still ranks near the bottom nationwide in categories like median income, infrastructure quality, and educational outcomes.

We’ve been doing the same thing for 30 years and expecting a different result. At some point, you have to admit the system itself not just the leadership is broken.

That sentiment is spreading. A growing number of residents, especially young entrepreneurs and reform minded professionals, are calling for fundamental structural change not incremental tweaks. They’re pointing to what they call a plantation economy 2.0, where political favoritism and inherited privilege trump innovation and merit. 

https://samueleburns.substack.com/p/stuck-at-the-bottom