Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Washington Gridlock: How the Political Establishment Is Sabotaging Trump’s Reform Agenda

By Staff Writer

When Donald J. Trump returned to the White House in January 2025, Washington’s ruling class shook. The populist movement that swept him back into power with RFK Jr. leading Health and Human Services and Elon Musk briefly heading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) represented something far more dangerous to the political establishment than ideological disagreement: accountability.

Nearly twelve months later, it’s clear that the D.C. cartel has chosen sabotage over cooperation. Both parties yes, both are actively obstructing President Trump’s reform agenda. From stalled budgets to delayed appointments, the permanent political class is sending a message loud and clear: they will burn the country down before surrendering control.

The refusal by Congress to pass a functioning budget isn’t incompetence it’s strategy. By blocking appropriations and leaving reform programs underfunded, Capitol Hill ensures that Trump’s initiatives die by attrition.

RFK Jr.’s Make America Healthy Again program designed to audit pharmaceutical contracting, expose toxicity cover-ups, and promote transparency remains starved of resources.

Musk’s defunct DOGE identified over $61 billion in redundant spending across four departments before his resignation; unsurprisingly, those reports vanished from committee discussions.

And Trump’s directives on regulatory reform and open-data audits remain stuck in legal limbo because Congress refuses to codify them knowing full well that without codification, future administrations can roll them back overnight.

The uni-party’s goal isn’t governance it’s guarding their gravy train.

Behind the chaos is what insiders now refer to as the Permanent Class:

Defense lobbyists terrified of audits.

Pharmaceutical foundations terrified of losing emergency authorization loopholes.

Finance-linked PACs terrified of Trump’s push for transparency in Federal Reserve policy.

The Republican establishment loves to campaign on smaller government but panics when someone actually tries to make it smaller. The Democrats pretend to defend democracy yet they openly subvert it when voters defy their agenda. Both are two wings of the same bird of prey.

Here’s a glimpse into how “bipartisanship” operates in 2025:

Sen. Harriet Rollins (R–KY):

“The administration’s consolidation of oversight power is concerning.”

Her donor list reads like a roll call of defense industry giants.

Rep. Carlos Mendes (D–CA):

“We can’t greenlight untested reforms that could destabilize longstanding institutions.”

In other words: too many friends have contracts to lose.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R–MO) cuts through the smokescreen:

“Career politicians and donors are united in one thing fear of exposure. What they call ‘gridlock’ is actually self-preservation.”

At a White House press event, Trump didn’t mince words:

“They can fight all they want, but we’re not backing down. The American people voted for independence not the same broken Congress working for its donors.”

RFK Jr. followed with characteristic venom, calling out the “medical-industrial complex” that “has held public health hostage for decades.”

Trump’s message is consistent: reform may move slow, but it will move forward with or without permission from Congress.

Recent polling from independent analysts shows nearly 70% of Americans now believe establishment politicians from both parties “actively work against reform.”

Grassroots conservatives, populists, libertarians, and working-class independents share one sentiment Washington isn’t broken by accident; it’s broken by design.

If Congress keeps choking off the President’s reforms, the 2026 midterms could turn into an organized rebellion at the ballot box.

Already, populist challengers are declaring war on sitting Republicans accused of collusion with Democrats to obstruct Trump’s appointments and bury transparency measures.

Expect primaries that look less like campaigns and more like trials.

Let’s be clear. This is no longer Republican vs. Democrat. It’s the governed vs. the governing.

The corporate class, the bureaucratic elite, and legacy media form a single ecosystem built on opacity and dependency.

Trump’s reforms whether you love or hate the man are the single gravest threat to that system.

The establishment’s survival depends on his failure.

They tell you it’s about “chaos in government.”

In truth, it’s about losing control of their cash machine.

As one senior White House staffer reportedly said:

“The hardest part isn’t fighting the opposition. It’s figuring out which allies are secretly rooting for us to fail.”

The battle for America’s future never ended in 2020. It merely went underground. The Trump-RFK populist coalition represents a direct challenge to a century of bureaucratic empire-building and Washington’s response has been to freeze the system until the people grow weary of reform.

But that strategy may backfire spectacularly. The American public has learned to see through the fog.

If Congress won’t pass the budget, approve appointments, or codify reform, the people will replace Congress one seat at a time.

The revolution is already on the ballot.

Corrupt Obama Judge Amy Berman Jackson Blocks Trump Admin From Defunding Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

A recent ruling by a federal judge has significant implications for the funding of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

• Judicial Action: US District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, appointed by former President Obama, has blocked the Trump Administration's effort to defund the CFPB. The judge has mandated that the CFPB continue receiving funds from the Federal Reserve.

• Trump Administration's Position: The Trump Administration, represented by OMB Director Russ Vought, had attempted to reduce the size of the CFPB, effectively shutting it down by issuing a "reduction in force. "

• Funding Issues: The ruling comes at a critical time, just before the CFPB was set to run out of funds. Reports indicate that the Federal Reserve is currently operating at a loss due to economic pressures termed as "Bidenflation. "

• Legal Challenges: The court ruling addresses the legitimacy of how the CFPB receives its funding, especially in light of the Trump Administration's claims against the agency's operational status and funding source.

• Operational Limitations: The CFPB has been largely inactive for nearly a year, with most employees unable to perform their duties, and has focused mainly on undoing previous work done under the Biden Administration and the Trump Administration’s initial term.

Judge Jackson's ruling preserves the CFPB's funding while legal debates continue regarding the Trump Administration's authority over the agency. This decision may influence the agency's ability to operate effectively moving forward. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/corrupt-obama-judge-amy-berman-jackson-blocks-trump/

DOE orders Indiana coal units totaling more than 950 MW to run past retirement dates

The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) has ordered Northern Indiana Public Service Co. (NIPSCO) and CenterPoint Energy to keep running certain coal-fired power units in Indiana past their planned retirement dates. This decision is part of an emergency response to current energy supply challenges.

1. Emergency Order: On December 23, 2025, the DOE issued “emergency” orders affecting three coal-fired units in Indiana with a total capacity of more than 950 MW. NIPSCO and CenterPoint had intended to shut these units down by December 31, 2025.

2. Reasoning for the Order: The DOE argues that there is an emergency in parts of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) region due to increasing energy demand and a shortage of reliable energy sources following the retirement of several generation facilities.

3. Duration of the Order: The coal units must continue operating until at least March 23, 2026, but the DOE has the option to extend this order if deemed necessary.

4. Historical Context: The DOE has previously issued similar emergency orders to prevent other power plants from retiring, totaling around 3.1 GW across various states, citing similar concerns about energy emergencies.

5. Concerns from Advocacy Groups: The Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, an advocacy group, has raised concerns that keeping these coal units operational will lead to higher electricity bills for consumers. They emphasize that the costs of running outdated and less efficient coal plants may lead to further financial strain on customers.

6. Legal Challenges: Some of the DOE's previous emergency orders are currently being challenged in federal appeals court by various state attorneys general and advocacy groups, who argue that the DOE has not sufficiently proven the existence of an energy emergency.

7. Additional Context: These orders come amid a backdrop of policy changes affecting renewable energy projects, including a recent freeze on offshore wind projects under the previous administration. There is a growing debate about the reliance on coal versus the transition to renewable energy sources.

The DOE's recent orders to keep coal units running reflect significant challenges in the U. S. energy landscape, marked by increasing demand and capacity shortages. While aimed at addressing immediate supply issues, the long-term implications on energy costs and the transition to cleaner sources remain contentious topics among stakeholders. 

https://www.utilitydive.com/news/doe-indiana-coal-nipsco-centerpoint-emergency-order/808660/

How China’s Rare Earth Stranglehold Is Unleashing American Innovation

The West is exploring innovative methods to reduce its reliance on China for critical minerals. A growing number of startups are focusing on extracting valuable metals from existing resources, such as oil wells, electronic waste, and other waste streams. This shift aims to develop domestic processing technologies and lessen China's grip on mineral production.

1. Declining Dependence on China:

• China currently controls about 90% of the global capacity for processing and manufacturing critical minerals.

• Recent tensions, such as export restrictions during trade disputes, have highlighted the risks of this dependence for countries like the U. S. and its allies.

2. Innovative Extraction Methods:

• Companies like MaverickX are finding ways to recover precious metals, such as rhodium, from oil wells and waste.

• Eric Herrera, CEO of MaverickX, believes that oil reserves in Texas can yield significant amounts of various metals, including rhodium, titanium, and cobalt, utilizing existing infrastructure and processes.

3. Advancements in Technology:

• James Tour, a chemist at Rice University, has developed a rapid extraction method using flash Joule heating, which allows for quick recovery of rare-earth metals from discarded electronics with minimal environmental impact.

• Tour’s techniques are already being commercialized, with companies aiming to process large amounts of electronic waste.

4. Environmental Considerations:

• Many of China's methods for refining minerals have raised ecological concerns, leading to contamination issues. In contrast, the new extraction methods may offer a cleaner solution.

5. Government Support and Funding:

• The U. S. government is now significantly investing in domestic mineral processing capabilities, with nearly $1 billion detailed for critical mineral supply chains, covering everything from mining to recycling.

6. International Collaboration:

• Australia is emerging as a key partner in diversifying mineral supply chains, with new processing hubs being established.

• European initiatives also focus on localizing the processing of strategic raw materials.

7. Challenges Ahead:

• Experts note that while it is possible to build a non-Chinese processing capacity, it will take time and effort to fully replace China’s dominance, especially for heavier rare-earth elements.

• Companies and governments need to engage deeply in supply chain discussions to secure essential materials.

The West is taking significant steps to enhance its critical mineral production capabilities and reduce its reliance on China. Through innovative extraction techniques and robust government support, there is potential to shift the balance of power in the global mineral market. While real progress is being made, experts warn that complete independence from China will require time, collaboration, and commitment from multiple stakeholders to build a resilient and sustainable supply chain. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/how-chinas-rare-earth-stranglehold-is-unleashing-american-innovation-5957283?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge&src_src=partner&src_cmp=ZeroHedge

Researchers Successfully Reverse Alzheimer’s in Mice: Peer-Reviewed Study

A recent study published on December 22 in the journal Cell Reports Medicine reported significant progress in reversing Alzheimer's disease in mice. This breakthrough could provide new avenues for treating the disease in humans.

• Researchers used a treatment called P7C3-A20 on two groups of genetically modified mice that exhibited Alzheimer’s-like symptoms.

• The treatment improved brain cell energy balance by restoring Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) levels, crucial for brain function.

• It also reversed brain damage, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and restored the blood-brain barrier's integrity.

• The mice displayed full cognitive recovery and reduced levels of p-tau217, a biomarker for Alzheimer’s.

• Starting the treatment in younger mice led to restored brain health after six months.

• Researchers believe this approach challenges previously held views that Alzheimer's is irreversible and may pave the way for new therapies.

The study shows that, under specific conditions, the damaged brain can repair itself. Given the rising number of Alzheimer’s patients, these findings are seen as a hopeful message, suggesting that advanced research and clinical tests could lead to effective treatments for humans. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/researchers-successfully-reverse-alzheimers-in-mice-peer-reviewed-study-5962919?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge&src_src=partner&src_cmp=ZeroHedge

Here Are The 10 Biggest Media Hoaxes Of 2025

In 2025, the media faced criticism for various alleged hoaxes that highlighted a decline in journalistic credibility. This summary outlines the ten major media incidents from the year, illustrating the perceived failures of media outlets to report accurately and honestly.

1. Elon Musk's Gestures: After President Trump’s inauguration, Elon Musk faced backlash for a hand gesture he made while speaking at an event, which some media outlets labeled as a "fascist salute. "

2. Pete Hegseth's Confirmation: Media outlets launched smear campaigns against Pete Hegseth, attempting to derail his Senate confirmation as war secretary through misleading reports about his past.

3. Joe Biden's Health: For years, the media allegedly ignored signs of Joe Biden's cognitive decline. Only later did they admit the truth about his health under the guise of promoting a book discussing the media's role in this cover-up.

4. Misrepresentation of Immigration Enforcement: The media misled the public about an illegal alien's deportation by depicting him as a typical American citizen, thereby downplaying his criminal background.

5. Russiagate Coverage: Declassified documents revealed misleading media narratives concerning Russia's influence in the 2016 election. Many outlets downplayed the significance of these revelations that contradicted their previous reports.

6. Sydney Sweeney's Jeans Ad: An advertisement featuring actress Sydney Sweeney led to accusations of promoting racism from some media figures, showcasing a tendency to overreact to non-political topics.

7. Charlie Kirk's Murder Coverage: Following the murder of conservative speaker Charlie Kirk, media representatives quickly labeled him as a polarizing figure, focusing on political narratives rather than the tragedy.

8. Denial of Leftist Violence: The media allegedly ignored or downplayed incidents of violence attributed to left-wing activists, framing them as conservative hysteria instead of legitimate concerns.

9. Lawfare against Trump: The media reportedly supported legal actions taken against Donald Trump while criticizing similar actions against Democrats, highlighting a perceived double standard.

10. Attacks on the Supreme Court: Efforts to challenge the authority of the Supreme Court were accompanied by media narratives that accused conservative justices of acting in Trump's interest, rather than upholding the law.

These ten examples encapsulate widespread criticism of the media's performance in 2025. The incidents reflect a belief that the media have not only failed in responsible reporting but have also actively shaped narratives that mislead the public. The credibility of news outlets is portrayed as significantly diminished, impacting public trust in journalism. 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/12/31/here-are-the-10-biggest-media-hoaxes-of-2025/

Rep. Omar is center stage in massive Minnesota fraud scandal for her support of abused programs

Rep. Ilhan Omar is facing scrutiny due to allegations of fraud related to programs she helped expand during the COVID-19 pandemic. The MEALS Act, which aimed to enhance federal support for food and childcare across Minnesota, has been linked to significant misconduct in the Somali immigrant community.

1. MEALS Act and Its Intentions:

• Omar promoted the MEALS Act to provide federal support for meals during the pandemic when schools were shut down.

• The Act aimed to remove certain oversight requirements to allow for swift implementation of the meal programs.

2. Fraud Allegations:

• Over 70 defendants are accused of misusing funds from the MEALS Act, with allegations of diverting approximately $250 million for personal profits.

• The "Feeding Our Future" program is specifically mentioned as a focal point for fraudulent activities during the pandemic.

3. Political Implications:

• Despite the ongoing investigations into these fraud claims, Omar has defended her legislation, stating it was aimed at helping children in need.

4. Previous Convictions Linked to the Fraud:

• Individuals tied to the fraudulent activities, including campaign donors, have pleaded guilty to charges involving improper fund usage.

• A former campaign associate was involved in running a fake food program that falsely reported thousands of meal distributions.

5. Public Concerns and Investigations:

• A viral video raised questions about the operation of funded daycare centers, showing some facilities underutilized or inactive.

• Local commissioners have expressed concern over the potential for fraud but have not confirmed any findings of wrongdoing from their investigations.

6. Ongoing Inquiry into State Management:

• Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has faced allegations of insufficient oversight over funds, resulting in lost payments in other areas, such as unemployment benefits.

• The House Oversight Committee has launched an investigation focusing on management of federal funds and potential cover-ups regarding fraud.

7. Ongoing Response from Officials:

• State officials, including Walz, maintain that state employees have not engaged in illegal activities but have criticized the lack of due diligence regarding grant management.

The fraud allegations surrounding the MEALS Act and associated meal programs in Minnesota have significant implications for Rep. Ilhan Omar and the broader issues of accountability and management of federal funds. With ongoing investigations into the parties involved, including members of the Somali immigrant community, the situation continues to develop as stakeholders call for transparency and responsibility in handling taxpayer money. 

https://justthenews.com/accountability/waste-fraud-and-abuse/ilhan-omar-caught-middle-minnesota-fraud-concerns-support

Republicans now have an answer for Democrats’ Medicare-for-all

Republicans are responding to Democratic healthcare proposals by offering their own ideas to improve the affordability and effectiveness of the American healthcare system. This discussion comes against the backdrop of significant previous healthcare reforms and rising healthcare costs.

1. Republican Response to Healthcare Challenges:

• Republicans, including President Trump, stress the importance of making healthcare affordable for families. They argue that the current healthcare system, influenced by Democratic policies, needs a fix.

2. Legislative Proposals:

• Senate Republicans Bill Cassidy and Mike Crapo propose redirecting unused Affordable Care Act (ACA) credits into direct Health Savings Account (HSA) deposits for low- to middle-income buyers of basic health plans. Their plan would ensure funds are not used for abortions or gender-affirming care and aims to lower insurance premiums by promoting cheaper plans.

• Other Republicans, like Rep. Austin Scott, advocate for increased competition among insurance providers and eliminating intermediaries that increase costs.

• Rep. Bob Onder emphasizes a free-market approach, advocating for reforms such as expanded HSAs, association health plans, and short-term health plans catering to individual customer needs.

3. Focus on Transparency and Consumer Choice:

• Many proposals, including those from Rep. Randy Fine, emphasize the need for transparency in healthcare costs. Fine suggests giving individuals tax advantages for purchasing their own insurance, similar to employer-provided insurance benefits, to encourage shopping for better prices and plans.

• House Speaker Mike Johnson's proposal includes expanding association health plans, lowering out-of-pocket costs, and improving transparency around pharmacy benefits to reduce drug prices.

4. Impact of Recent Events:

• The recent 43-day federal government shutdown highlighted the contentious issue of enhanced ACA premium tax credit subsidies, which are due to expire. These subsidies are critical for millions of enrollees, and their extension was a significant point of contention between parties.

5. Historical Context:

• The article reviews the long history of attempts by Democrats to implement national health insurance, starting from President Truman's proposal in 1945 to the Affordable Care Act in 2010. While these efforts aimed to expand healthcare access, they often faced significant opposition and resulted in increased costs.

• Since the ACA's implementation, average health insurance premiums have increased significantly, demonstrating the rising costs of care as a persistent issue.

Republicans are presenting their vision for healthcare reform in response to the Democratic push for Medicare-for-All. Their proposals focus on increasing competition, enhancing consumer choice, and offering direct support to individuals, moving away from the issues they attribute to previous Democratic policies. The landscape of healthcare reform continues to evolve, driven by ongoing debates over costs, access, and the role of government in providing care. 

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/republicans-now-have-answer-democrats-medicare-all

As New York pursues climate objectives, conservationists raise alarm about solar project’s impact

 As New York State works towards ambitious renewable energy goals set by the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act, there is significant tension between conservationists and state regulatory authorities. The Grassland Bird Trust (GBT) has raised serious concerns about the Fort Edward solar project and its potential negative impacts on protected bird habitats.

• Climate Goals: New York aims to reduce emissions by 40% from 1990 levels by 2040 and 85% by 2050, with all electricity to be zero-emissions by 2040.

• Solar Project Overview: The Fort Edward solar project spans approximately 1,800 acres, with solar panels covering about 567 acres. GBT argues that the project threatens the habitats of more than a dozen bird species in a Wildlife Management Area.

• Conservationists' Concerns: GBT board members Terry Griffin and Kathy Roome claim that the project will negatively impact grassland birds, including the endangered short-eared owl. They are advocating for a 1-to-1 mitigation policy to offset the land used for solar panels, which they believe is essential for the conservation of these species.

• Public Involvement Challenges: The GBT was denied party status, preventing them from formally participating in discussions regarding the project. Their appeal for this status is based on concerns that their feedback has been ignored, with limited engagement from the state regulatory authority, the Office of Renewable Energy Siting (ORES).

• Limited Mitigation Impact: Current state law mandates mitigation only for 216 acres of the impacted 567 acres. GBT argues this is insufficient and does not meet the needs of the threatened species, emphasizing that the birds require wide-open grassland to thrive.

• Public Hearing Responses: Although a public comment hearing was held, with most attendees opposing the project, conservationists feel this input was disregarded as simply a bureaucratic formality. They describe the process as "theater" without real consideration of public opinion.

• Agency's Response: ORES stated that they cannot comment on the matter while GBT appeals the denial of party status. They assert that public feedback can lead to project changes, but conservationists dispute the effectiveness of these processes.

• Siting Denials: Other organizations, like the American Land Rescue Fund, have faced similar challenges in gaining party status and expressing concerns. They too have been unsuccessful in communicating effectively with ORES.

• Renewable Energy Conflicts: New York’s aggressive renewable energy agenda is likely to lead to more conflicts over land use, given that wind and solar energy are land-intensive. Since the climate act's enactment in 2019, 32 projects have been rejected in the state.

• Current Challenges: Reports indicate that New York is lagging in meeting climate goals, particularly in renewable energy generation. Energy prices in the state have risen significantly since the enactment of the climate law, leading to criticism from various stakeholders, including media outlets like The Washington Post.

There is growing concern among conservationists regarding the impact of the Fort Edward solar project on bird populations and habitats. The denial of party status to environmental groups reflects larger issues in New York's regulatory processes surrounding renewable energy development. As the state pursues its climate objectives, the challenge remains to balance these ambitions with environmental protection and community input to avoid exacerbating existing conflicts over land use and conservation.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/new-york-pursues-climate-objectives-conservationists-raise-alarm-about-solar

The Pence Mirage: Why the Right Isn’t Leaving Trump

The alleged shift in conservative politics due to recent events involving Mike Pence and the Heritage Foundation. It argues that this shift is more an anti-Trump sentiment rather than a genuine movement towards a new conservatism.

1. Heritage Foundation Mutiny: A small group of Heritage Foundation employees joined Pence’s organization, purportedly signaling a major conservative shift, but the author views this as negligible.

2. Pence's Role: Mike Pence is positioned as a symbol of traditional conservatism, which the author argues lacks traction among the conservative base. Pence allegedly failed to gain support during his brief 2024 presidential campaign.

3. Trump’s Accomplishments: The piece highlights achievements attributed to Donald Trump during his presidency, such as:

• Strong border control and immigration policies.

• Economic growth with significant investments and reduced inflation.

• Crime reduction, including a notable drop in murder rates.

4. Critique of Mainstream Media: The article claims that mainstream media focuses on discrediting Trump while ignoring his successes and the effectiveness of his policies.

5. Perception of Conservatism: The author asserts that the mainstream conservative establishment, represented by figures like Pence, is out of touch with the electorate's desires. Pence's tendency to advocate for foreign policies over immediate domestic concerns (like crime) is seen as a weakness.

6. Cultural and Political Divide: The discussion includes the cultural rift within the Republican Party, contrasting Pence's conventional approach with Trump's populist style.

7. Future of Conservatism: The article suggests that the future of conservative politics is more associated with Trump’s America-First policies than with Pence’s traditional views.

The author concludes that Mike Pence’s attempts to establish a new conservative standard are ineffective amid the enduring influence of Donald Trump. The belief in a reorganization of the conservative movement is dismissed as another anti-Trump mirage, with Trump continuing to command the main stage in politics despite internal disagreements within the Republican Party. The author views current events as part of a larger trend where the traditional elements of conservatism struggle to resonate with voters who favor Trump's results-oriented governance. 

https://amgreatness.com/2025/12/30/the-pence-mirage-why-the-right-isnt-leaving-trump/

Iran: A Population Overthrowing an Islamic Tyranny?

The current situation in Iran, where the Persian people are protesting against what is described as an oppressive Islamic tyranny. It highlights the global implications of these protests and the support received from various commentators.

1. Global Resistance to Change: The article asserts that global powers, including globalists and Western governments, are opposed to regime change in Iran as it threatens their influence and control. The Iranian regime, referred to as mullahs, is portrayed as a critical ally for these powers.

2. Support for Iranian People: There is a call for support for the Persian people who are actively demonstrating against their government, likening their struggle to a fight for freedom against tyranny.

3. Cultural Honor: A featured discussion involves Hooman Khalili, an Iranian-born artist, about murals honoring the Iranian freedom fighters. This is positioned as a symbol of the current fight for women's rights and general freedom in Iran.

4. Oppressive Regime Conditions: The article provides a disturbing portrayal of the Iranian regime as brutal and tyrannical, emphasizing cases of violence against protesters, particularly women. The murder of Mahsa Amini is highlighted as a tragic example of the regime's oppression.

5. Philosophical Backing for Rebellion: It references the ideas of the philosopher John Locke, who advocated that citizens have the right to revolt against governments that do not protect their rights and safety.

6. Commentary on Social Issues: Several commenters express strong sentiments about the brutality of the Iranian government, particularly toward women. Various examples of violence and oppression are given to argue that the Iranian people have justified reasons to resist and seek change.

The article and accompanying commentary convey a strong message of solidarity with the Iranian people's struggle against their oppressive government. The ongoing protests are seen not only as a local issue but also as a significant event with global implications that challenge established power structures. Calls for international support and recognition of the human rights abuses in Iran underline the urgency of the situation. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/iran-a-population-overthrowing-an-islamic-tyranny/

Ensuring Trust in Elections

Trust in U. S. elections has declined in recent years, prompting the need for stronger measures to secure voter legitimacy. The Trump Administration has proposed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act to ensure that only citizens vote in federal elections.

1. SAVE Act Overview: The SAVE Act aims to verify voter citizenship by requiring states to collect proof, such as birth certificates, passports, or naturalization documents. It seeks to standardize voter registration processes across states.

2. Current State of Trust: A significant portion of the American public (70%) supports these measures due to concerns about non-citizen voting. Critics argue that current laws already prohibit this, but incidents have been reported that suggest enforcement is inadequate.

3. Impact of Non-Citizen Voting: Studies provide evidence of non-citizens voting in past elections, possibly impacting outcomes. Notably, North Carolina identified thousands of non-citizen registrants before the 2014 election.

4. Challenges with Current Systems: States have inconsistent verification processes, leading to varying effectiveness in preventing non-citizen voting. Methods such as same-day registration carry the highest risks of fraudulent registrations.

5. Criticism of the SAVE Act: Opponents argue that the SAVE Act could complicate registration for citizens, particularly in cases of name changes (like marriage) but proponents counter that the required documentation is similar to that needed for other official processes.

6. Implementation Concerns: If the SAVE Act passes, it remains unclear how states will handle citizenship verification when citizens move. Establishing a system for maintaining records that can be transferred across state lines is suggested.

7. Concerns About Burden on Voters: There may be a tight deadline for voters relocating and needing to provide documentation of their citizenship. A grace period could help alleviate the pressure on these voters.

The SAVE Act represents a necessary step toward ensuring the integrity of U. S. elections. Given the ongoing discussions about election legitimacy, implementing a citizenship verification process is vital to maintain public confidence in the electoral system. The Senate is urged to advance the SAVE Act to reinforce trust in elections.

https://spectator.org/ensuring-trust-in-elections/ 

Firefighters Could Have Prevented the L.A. Wildfires, but California Rules Made Them Save Plants Instead

A small brush fire in Topanga State Park, ignited by arson, escalated into one of the worst wildfire disasters in Los Angeles history, largely attributed to California's state policies. This summary discusses the failures in fire management, the role of state regulations, and the ongoing investigation into the causes of the catastrophe.

The Initial Fire Incident

• Date and Location: A small brush fire broke out on New Year's Eve in Topanga State Park, near Pacific Palisades.

• Containment: The Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) quickly contained the eight-acre fire, which was later determined to be started by a 29-year-old arsonist.

• Reignition: The fire reignited a week later, leading to widespread devastation that burned over 23,000 acres and destroyed nearly 7,000 structures while resulting in 12 fatalities.

Factors Contributing to the Disaster

• Infrastructure Issues: The L. A. Department of Water and Power had kept the nearby water reservoir empty, leading to low water pressure during firefighting efforts.

• Poor Coordination: The response to the rekindled fire was uncoordinated, with no pre-deployment of resources despite warnings of dangerous conditions.

• State Policies: New evidence, including text messages and documents from a lawsuit filed by victims, points to California's state policies that may have prioritized environmental protection over human safety, contributing to the fire's severity.

Evidence of Policy Impact

• Fire Management Policies: California State Parks had a management plan that favored letting wildfires burn to protect certain plants and cultural resources, which detracted from effective firefighting.

• Smoldering Conditions Ignored: State Parks employees reportedly failed to monitor the smoldering burn area, despite witnessing active smoldering days before the flash fire reignited.

• Internal Communications: Text messages between State Parks employees indicate attempts to limit fire suppression tactics to avoid damaging endangered plant species, showing a clear influence of these policies on operational decisions during the fire.

The Role of State Parks

• Environmental Safeguards: State Parks maintained maps indicating "avoidance areas" where firefighting strategies could be restricted, claiming to protect sensitive natural and cultural resources.

• Controversy Over Policies: The agency has denied claims that its policies negatively impacted firefighting actions, while attorneys argue that these restrictions led to profound failures in managing the fire.

Implications for Fire Safety

• Public Risk Awareness: The preference for allowing the park to burn poses significant risks to homes in adjacent neighborhoods, raising questions about transparency and policy justification.

• Long-Term Consequences: Evidence suggests that the approach adopted by State Parks actively undermined the safety of nearby communities, complicating firefighting efforts.

Government Response

• Official Standpoint: Governor Gavin Newsom and State Parks officials have dismissed lawsuits against the state, contending that the fire was initiated by arson and denouncing claims that the state's environmental policies compromised public safety.

• Environmental vs. Human Safety Debate: The ongoing discussion highlights whether stringent environmental policies have compromised the safety of residents, a question yet to be fully addressed by state leaders.

The Palisades Fire illustrates the complex interplay between environmental policies and human safety. While the initial cause of the fire was arson, systemic issues regarding management decisions that prioritize ecological over human considerations contributed significantly to the disaster's scale. As investigations progress, the implications of these findings will be crucial in shaping future fire management strategies and protecting vulnerable communities from similar disasters. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/la-wildfires-pacific-palisades-california-rules

Vitamin C and Climate

The evolutionary history of humans regarding vitamin C production and its implications for health, particularly in the context of changing climates and nutritional needs. It argues that the loss of vitamin C production in human ancestors is intricately linked to historical climate shifts and how this has impacted human health over millions of years.

1. Evolution and Vitamin C Production:

• Early human ancestors lost the ability to produce vitamin C around 40 to 60 million years ago, during a warmer period filled with abundant fruit.

• Producing vitamin C requires energy and liver resources, providing an evolutionary advantage to species that obtain it from their diet instead.

2. Impact of Climate Change:

• As Antarctica drifted to the South Pole and the climate became colder and drier, the availability of vitamin C-rich fruits decreased.

• Therefore, humans now live with a chronic deficiency in vitamin C, which impacts health across varying climates.

3. Vitamin C Needs and Deficiencies:

• Most mammals require about 20 mg of vitamin C per kilogram of body weight daily; for an average human, this translates to around 1.4 grams.

• The recommended dietary allowance (RDA) in some regions is much lower, leading to potential deficiencies in the general population.

4. Vitamin C and Health:

• Vitamin C plays crucial roles in collagen synthesis, immune function, and protection against oxidative stress.

• During infections, vitamin C levels drop significantly in humans, heightening risks like capillary leaks and oxidative damage compared to other mammals.

5. Responses to Stress:

• Many animals can increase vitamin C production significantly when stressed or infected, unlike humans who rely on dietary intake.

• Vitamin C's role as an antioxidant is powerful during infections; low levels can impair the immune system’s ability to respond effectively.

6. Vitamin C and Viral Infections:

• Vitamin C enhances interferon production necessary to manage viral replication.

• It helps stabilize iron in the body, impacting the availability of iron for viruses to use in replication.

7. Vitamin C in Cancer Treatment:

• High doses of vitamin C, especially by intravenous delivery, demonstrate potential in aiding cancer treatment by increasing oxidative stress in cancer cells.

• Early therapeutic doses are kept cautious to manage the necrotic response of dying cancer cells.

8. Synergistic Nutritional Roles:

• Vitamin C, vitamin D, and zinc work together to combat viral infections, with each having unique roles in immune response.

• Vitamin C acts fast, vitamin D has a longer-term regulatory role, and zinc is essential for antiviral enzyme function.

The history of vitamin C production in humans highlights the evolutionary trade-offs made during a warmer climate. As climates shifted and the availability of vitamin-rich foods diminished, humans adapted to survive but at a cost to health. This adaptation presents significant implications for current health, particularly regarding immune function, infection response, and disease treatment. The article emphasizes the necessity of ensuring adequate vitamin C intake to mitigate these risks, especially in the context of modern health challenges. 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/12/31/vitamin-c-and-climate/

Ilhan Omar's Fraud Scandal Raises Questions About Accountability

Rep. Ilhan Omar, a congresswoman from Minnesota, is facing serious allegations of fraud linked to federal pandemic aid programs. She has been criticized for advocating the MEALS Act, which has come under scrutiny after over 70 individuals were accused of defrauding a related program of $250 million. Despite these allegations, Omar claims her initiatives have helped feed children in need.

Two men from her campaign have pleaded guilty to fraud, raising ethical questions about her connections. The House Oversight Committee is investigating fraud in federal funds management under Governor Tim Walz's administration. This situation underscores the need for accountability in government spending, with increasing calls for scrutiny into Omar’s programs and their effectiveness in serving the community. 

https://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=241058

Swalwell: As CA Gov I Will Charge ICE Agents, Take Away Their Drivers License

On a recent episode of MS NOW's "All In," Representative Eric Swalwell (D-CA) outlined his intentions if elected governor of California, focusing on how he would address the actions of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.

• Swalwell stated that he would charge ICE agents for crimes if they violate laws, such as false imprisonment or assault, while pursuing immigrants.

• He emphasized the importance of holding ICE agents accountable, suggesting that if they do not reveal their identities, they should not be eligible for a driver's license in California.

• Swalwell highlighted the governor's responsibility to protect vulnerable populations and stressed the need for a proactive approach to defend communities against aggressive immigration tactics.

• He discussed California's significant role due to its size and economy, suggesting that the state has the unique power to lead against federal policies perceived as harmful.

Swalwell's statements reflect a commitment to hold ICE agents accountable and provide protections for immigrants. He believes that a governor must actively defend vulnerable communities and ensure that law enforcement operates transparently and fairly. 

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/12/30/swalwell-as-ca-gov-i-will-charge-ice-agents-take-away-their-drivers-license/

Trump admin freezes all childcare payments to Minnesota amid massive fraud scandal

The Department of Health and Human Services has frozen all federal child care payments to the state of Minnesota amid a far-reaching fraud scandal that has unfolded in the state. 

HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O’Neill announced on Tuesday evening that three actions have been taken amid " serious allegations that the state of Minnesota has funneled millions of taxpayer dollars to fraudulent daycares across Minnesota over the past decade."

O’Neill said he has "activated our defend the spend system for all ACF payments. Starting today, all ACF payments across America will require a justification and a receipt or photo evidence before we send money to a state." He said that the HHS has identified individuals featured in independent report Nick Shirley’s recent video, and has demanded that Governor Tim Walz conduct an audit of the centers featured. 

O’Neill also announced that a dedicated fraud hotline and email address have been launched. 

"We have turned off the money spigot and we are finding the fraud," he said.

Alex Adams, Assistant Secretary for the Administration for Children and Families, said his office provides Minnesota with $185 million in childcare funds every year. "That money should be helping 19,000 American children, including toddlers and infants. Any dollar stolen by those fraudsters is stolen from those children." 

He said he had spoken with the Director of the Minnesota Child Care Services Office, and "she could not tell me with confidence whether those allegations of fraud are isolated or whether there is fraud stretching statewide." 

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-trump-admin-freezes-all-childcare-payments-to-minnesota-amid-massive-fraud-scandal

After Minnesota’s Fraud Disaster, Hochul Pushes New York’s Own ‘Universal Childcare’ Scheme

Childcare policies in New York. The focus is on Governor Kathy Hochul's support for a universal childcare plan and its potential financial implications for taxpayers.

• Holiday Sale Promotion: The text begins with an emphasis on a Christmas and New Year VIP sale, suggesting a festive offer aimed at customers during the holiday season.

• Political Insight: The commentary critiques Governor Kathy Hochul's endorsement of a multi-billion-dollar universal childcare plan proposed by incoming NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani.

• Concerns About Funding: It raises concerns about the funding for this initiative, questioning how it will be financed and implying that it will lead to higher taxes for New Yorkers.

• Fraud Issues: Reference is made to past instances of fraud in Minnesota’s childcare programs, suggesting that similar issues could arise in New York if the proposed plan is implemented without stringent oversight.

• Economic Impact: The commentary argues that increasing taxes to fund the childcare plan could lead to a rise in the cost of living, thereby contradicting the alleged goal of making life more affordable for families.

• Opposition Viewpoint: Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman and some other officials express opposition to the proposed tax increases, advocating instead for reallocating existing budget expenditures.

The content juxtaposes a promotional holiday message with a critical analysis of proposed childcare policies in New York. It warns against potential financial burdens on taxpayers while highlighting contrasting views on how to address childcare affordability without worsening economic conditions.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/amy-curtis/2025/12/30/houchul-supports-mamdanis-universal-healthcare-n2668600 

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

“The Little Piece of Paper That Stops Time”: Inside the Senate’s Blue Slip Power Struggle

 In the United States Senate, power rarely announces itself. It whispers through corridors lined with portraits of long-dead men. It lives in customs and pieces of paper that most Americans will never see. Among these tokens of authority, one artifact stands out for its near-mystical influence a small sheet of blue paper capable of halting a president’s judicial nominee in their tracks for years.

It is called the blue slip, and for over a century, it has been alternately revered, ignored, or abused depending on who stands to gain from its use.

The tradition traces back to 1917, to a senator from Montana named Thomas J. Walsh, who chaired the Judiciary Committee. Walsh introduced the blue slip as a token of respect: a formal way to ask the senators from a nominee’s home state whether they approved. It was meant to symbolize balance between local representation and presidential appointment.

https://samueleburns.substack.com/p/the-little-piece-of-paper-that-stops

Top Attorney For Special Counsel Jack Smith Previously Spiked Clinton Foundation Investigation

 Recent discussions and document releases have shed light on Ray Hulser’s actions during the Clinton Foundation investigations, revealing serious concerns about his partiality and decisions affecting these investigations. This summary outlines the significant points surrounding Hulser’s conduct and its implications for current investigations, particularly those associated with former President Trump.

1. Background on Ray Hulser

• Ray Hulser was the head of the Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section (PIN) and involved in investigations related to the Clinton Foundation.

• He faced allegations of bias and misconduct while interacting with the investigations during Trump’s presidency.

2. Withholding Information

• Documents revealed that Hulser withheld pertinent information from the U. S. Attorney's office, which was investigating the Clinton Foundation.

• He allegedly provided inconsistent details about the probe to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Special Counsel John Durham.

3. Involvement in Trump Investigations

• Special Counsel Jack Smith later selected Hulser to assist in the investigations targeting Trump, during which Hulser recommended subpoenaing records of several Republican congressmen.

4. House Judiciary Committee Inquiry

• Rep. Jim Jordan has requested Hulser to appear before the House Judiciary Committee for questioning about his involvement in the investigations into Trump following the 2020 election.

• Jordan’s inquiry is partly based on recently released documents that question Hulser's objectivity.

5. Clinton Foundation Investigation Background

• There were three previous investigations into the Clinton Foundation that began as early as 2015, with discussions initiated by FBI agents.

• Hulser notably refused to support a preliminary investigation into the Clintons in early 2016, arguing the information was inadequate and poorly presented.

6. Hulser’s Downplaying Allegations

• During investigations, Hulser described allegations against the Clintons as “de minimis,” despite evidence indicating substantial financial transactions that could involve bribery.

• This drew attention to potential misconduct and misrepresentation of facts regarding the investigation's merits.

7. Interference from Higher Authority

• Following Hulser’s refusal, the investigations faced significant interference from the Obama Administration's DOJ and FBI.

• Documents indicate that FBI agents were prohibited from pursuing various lines of inquiry related to the Clinton Foundation.

8. Aftermath and New Investigations

• After Trump’s victory in 2016, the Little Rock office of the FBI reopened the investigation due in part to concerns over how it was initially shut down.

• Questions about why the original cases were closed arose during subsequent inquiries by U. S. Attorney Cody Hiland.

9. Hulser’s Dismissive Attitude

• In conversations with U. S. Attorney Hiland, Hulser reportedly dismissed the importance of the Clinton Foundation investigation and withheld critical documentation from him.

• This has raised questions about the integrity of Hulser’s role within the context of the investigations.

10. Controversy Surrounding His Departure

• Hulser was fired under the Trump administration and subsequently portrayed as a dedicated career prosecutor despite the issues raised about his history with the Clintons.

• His termination has been linked to a broader effort to address perceived deep state operations within the government.

The investigation into Ray Hulser's conduct during the Clinton Foundation inquiries reveals significant issues related to bias and interference by higher authorities. As investigations into Trump continue, Hulser’s involvement raises serious questions regarding the integrity of the DOJ and its officials. The ongoing inquiry by Rep. Jim Jordan and the House Judiciary Committee could further illuminate the challenges and potential misconduct in previous administrations’ handling of these cases. 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/12/29/top-attorney-for-special-counsel-jack-smith-previously-spiked-clinton-foundation-investigation/

Lopsided Largesse: Subsidies for renewables account for almost all energy-sector federal support

 A report from the National Center for Energy Analytics (NCEA) reveals that in fiscal year 2025, the federal government allocated a significant portion of its energy sector subsidies to renewable energy sources, particularly electric vehicles and energy-efficient technologies. The report highlights the disparity between subsidies for renewable energy and fossil fuels and challenges certain narratives around fossil fuel financial support.

• Overall Federal Subsidies: Total government subsidies for the energy sector in 2025 reached $64.1 billion, with 90% of this amount directed towards renewable energy initiatives.

• Breakdown of Subsidies:

• Renewable energy, electric vehicles, and energy-efficient equipment received $57.9 billion in subsidies.

• Fossil fuel industries, including oil, gas, and coal, had tax expenditures amounting to just $2.6 billion, which is much smaller compared to those for renewables.

• Disputing Exaggerated Claims: The NCEA report counters claims from some environmental groups that fossil fuel industries receive excessive governmental support. For instance:

• The International Monetary Fund (IMF) claims that fossil fuels receive about $7 trillion globally, while other studies estimate U. S. support at $34.8 billion annually.

• The NCEA argues these figures are exaggerated, attributing much of the alleged support to perceived costs or externalities not formally classified as subsidies.

• Externalities Explained: Critics often argue that the costs of health and environmental impacts from fossil fuels represent hidden subsidies. However, the NCEA maintains that these claims are based on questionable methodology and are subjective.

• Types of Subsidies:

• Fossil fuel support largely comes through tax deductions related to operational expenses. These include costs like drilling and labor.

• Renewable energy companies benefit from production and investment tax credits which significantly lower their tax liabilities.

• Comparative Support: The analysis finds that the U. S. support for fossil fuels is lower compared to other developed countries, particularly in Europe, which provides more direct subsidies.

• Future of Subsidies: The report suggests that eliminating fossil fuel subsidies would not dramatically affect the industry's profitability or demand. As renewable energy credits are expected to surpass fossil fuel support in the coming years, this trend suggests a continuing shift toward supporting renewable initiatives.

The NCEA's report provides a comprehensive overview of federal energy subsidies in 2025, showcasing a strong bias towards renewable energy. It challenges some common narratives about fossil fuel support while revealing the government’s fiscal focus, which aims to promote cleaner energy alternatives over traditional fossil fuels. The ongoing discussions surrounding subsidies are crucial for shaping future policies as the energy landscape continues to evolve. 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/subsidies-renewables-account-almost-all-energy-sector-federal-support-new

Stop Apologizing For Being White

 The reactions to Vice President J. D. Vance's speech at the December 2025 Turning Point USA summit, where he stated that white Americans no longer need to apologize for their race. The piece argues against the backlash from the left and defends the idea of pride in white identity, while critiquing accusations of racism.

1. Vance's Statement: At the summit, Vance asserted that white individuals do not owe apologies for their race, which sparked significant criticism from left-wing commentators, accusing him of promoting white supremacy.

2. Left-Wing Backlash: Various media outlets and social media users expressed outrage, labeling Vance as racist and comparing him to extremist figures. Critics described the speech as dangerous and called for condemnation from anyone associated with Trump.

3. Personal Response: The author received criticism for supporting Vance, indicating that not denouncing him equates to endorsing white supremacy. However, the author proudly identifies as white and American, dismissing feelings of guilt tied to ancestry and instead celebrating achievements of Western civilization.

4. Historical Context: The piece argues that despite claims of systemic racism, America has a history of fighting for equality, noting the Civil War, the abolition of slavery, and the Civil Rights Movement, emphasizing that many white Americans were vital in these struggles.

5. Counter to Anti-White Sentiment: The content suggests that an anti-white narrative promotes the idea that whites must apologize for historical injustices. It refutes claims of an inherently racist nation and calls for white Americans to take pride in their identity without guilt.

6. Criticism of Marxist Narratives: The author claims that Marxist ideologies have infiltrated discussions about race in America, asserting that these perspectives aim to shift blame onto white citizens and promote a socialist agenda.

7. Call to Action: The piece encourages white Americans to reject guilt and speak out against narratives that promote shame based on race. It stresses the importance of national identity and pride regardless of racial background.

The author defends Vance's message about pride in white identity and challenges the left's portrayal of white Americans as universally guilty of racism. By highlighting historical contributions to equality and rights movements, the piece calls for a collective rejection of guilt and the promotion of pride in all racial identities in America. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/12/stop_apologizing_for_being_white.html

Poverty Reduction Programs Do Not Reduce Poverty

 The effectiveness of poverty reduction programs in the U. S. over the past 50 years, highlighting the unchanged poverty rate despite a significant increase in government spending on these programs.

1. Static Poverty Rate: The percentage of Americans living in poverty has remained at approximately 11% from 1973 to 2023, despite increased government spending.

2. Escalating Expenditures: Federal spending on poverty reduction programs has surged from about $5,000 per person annually in 1973 to over $30,000 per person in 2023, totaling projected spending of over $1 trillion by the end of fiscal year 2025.

3. Ineffective Design: The article argues that these programs fail to incentivize recipients to seek higher income sources. For example, families on Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) risk losing benefits if they earn more than a certain threshold, discouraging them from working more hours.

4. Dependency Issues: Many recipients prefer to stay on government aid rather than pursue full-time employment due to the benefits structure of programs like TANF, which creates dependency rather than self-sufficiency.

5. Work Requirements: While TANF requires some work, only about 22% of adults receiving TANF are employed at any given time, suggesting a lack of effective engagement in the workforce.

6. Proposed Solutions: The authors suggest rethinking poverty reduction programs. Instead of merely providing financial aid, they propose introducing skill-development programs aimed at promoting financial literacy and responsible financial behavior.

7. Importance of Financial Education: Research indicates that financial literacy can positively influence spending habits and financial decision-making, which could benefit impoverished households.

The article concludes that current poverty reduction programs are ineffective in reducing poverty and that a shift towards incentivizing financial literacy and responsible financial behaviors is necessary. It advocates for either reducing traditional poverty program spending or reorienting them towards educational initiatives that facilitate self-sufficiency and wealth creation. 

https://spectator.org/poverty-reduction-programs-do-not-reduce-poverty/

"Quality Learing Center" First Domino To Fall As Somali-Linked Minneapolis Daycare Scandal Shocks Nation

 A significant investigation has begun in Minneapolis regarding fraudulent activities linked to daycare centers operated by Somali individuals. A citizen journalist's viral video has brought widespread attention to alleged misuse of taxpayer funds in these facilities.

1. Viral Exposure: Nick Shirley, a citizen journalist, published a video that gained over 121 million views within days, exposing alleged fraud in childcare centers linked to Somali operators. His findings prompted the Minnesota Department of Children to shut down one center named "Quality Learing Center" due to its questionable operations.

2. Federal Investigation: Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agents are now in Minneapolis conducting a massive review of childcare and fraud cases. This investigation aims to uncover how taxpayer money has been misused. Secretary Kristi Noem stated that the public deserves answers and accountability.

3. Political Repercussions: The situation is politically sensitive, particularly for Minnesota Governor Tim Walz. He has faced criticism for allegedly ignoring fraud warnings related to these childcare centers. As the scandal unfolds, Walz's comments attributing the backlash to “white supremacy” have attracted further scrutiny.

4. History of Allegations: Fraud allegations against Somali-linked childcare operations have been known for years, but increased attention follows Shirley’s investigation. Reports suggest these centers may function as front companies that divert taxpayer funds to fraudulent activities, potentially including links to overseas terrorist networks.

5. Unusual Patterns: Investigations revealed significant discrepancies between the funding received by daycare centers and their actual services. Many centers showed minimal operational activity despite substantial state and federal funding.

6. Comprehensive Analysis Needed: The investigation will likely include mapping the connections between identified fraudulent entities to reveal network behaviors, such as shared addresses and patterns of financial transactions among these businesses.

The growing scrutiny of Somali-linked daycare operations in Minneapolis represents a significant moment for transparency in how taxpayer funds are allocated and utilized. With viral attention and federal investigations underway, further revelations may emerge, prompting potential legal and political shifts, particularly within the local Democratic leadership. The situation highlights the necessity for comprehensive oversight of childcare services to prevent fraud and ensure that resources are used to support vulnerable populations effectively. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/network-mapping-nick-shirleys-empty-minnesota-daycares

Where Do Microplastics Come From Anyway?

  Microplastics, tiny plastic pieces less than 5 mm in size, are a significant environmental issue. They are found in oceans, soil, drinking water, food, and even the air.

• Sources: The largest contributors to microplastic pollution are synthetic textiles (35%), tires (28%), city dust (24%), and road markings (7%).

• Types: Microplastics enter the environment as:

• Primary Microplastics: Released directly at a microscopic size (e.g., fibers from synthetic fabrics, rubber dust from tires, and plastic pellets).

• Secondary Microplastics: Formed from the breakdown of larger plastic items due to environmental factors.

• Environmental Impact: An estimated 21 million tonnes of primary microplastics are in various environments, posing threats to ecosystems.

• Solutions: Addressing the issue requires both technological advancements, like microfiber filters for washing machines, and changes in behavior towards materials used.

Understanding where microplastics come from is essential for effective solutions. The problem extends beyond commonly mentioned items like straws and bags, highlighting a broader pollution challenge.

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/where-do-microplastics-come-anyway

Regenerative Agriculture Finally Has A Seat At The Table At USDA

 The USDA, with help from influential figures in regenerative agriculture, announced a new $700 million investment aimed at supporting regenerative farming practices. This initiative comes at a time when many farmers are cautious due to past experiences with federal programs.

• Skepticism Among Farmers: Many farmers are doubtful about federal commitments due to previous cuts in support programs and inconsistencies in aid for small family farms.

• Importance of Regenerative Agriculture: Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins believe in the benefits of regenerative agriculture for farmers, public health, and the environment.

• American Regeneration Organization: Co-founders Kelly Ryerson, Rick Clark, and the author aim to promote soil health in agricultural policy.

• Funding and Outcomes: The key to success lies in tying funding to measurable results, encouraging conventional farmers to adopt regenerative practices.

• New USDA Pilot Program: Features include a focus on regenerative agriculture, streamlined applications, multi-year transition support, baseline soil testing, and multi-agency coordination. Funding is linked to demonstrated improvements.

• Cultural Shift: There is a growing recognition within the USDA of the importance of soil health and the profitability it can bring to farmers.

• Voices of Practitioners: Pioneers like Rick Clark and Blake Alexander emphasize the need for farming practices that work with nature for improved sustainability and health.

The USDA's investment marks a potential turning point for regenerative agriculture. While skepticism remains due to bureaucratic challenges, this pilot program signals a significant step toward rewarding farmers for sustainable practices and improving environmental and public health outcomes. If successful, it could pave the way for expanded funding and broader reforms in agricultural policy.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/opinion/regenerative-agriculture-finally-has-a-seat-at-the-table-at-usda-5962087

The Great War Was the Great Error

 The tragic consequences of World War I and how its underlying causes still resonate today. It argues that the war's initiation was based on misleading narratives and political machinations, leading to catastrophic outcomes that shaped the 20th century and continue to affect global peace and security.

1. Christmas Truce of 1914: Soldiers on the Western Front spontaneously celebrated Christmas together, which highlighted the senselessness of their conflict. This moment illustrated a brief glimpse of humanity amidst the horrors of war, raising questions about the reasons for their fighting.

2. No Justification for the War: The article claims that there was no valid reason for World War I, attributing its outbreak to a mix of military strategies, political intrigue, and national grievances that spiraled out of control.

3. Consequences of WWI: The war led to significant geopolitical changes, sowing the seeds for totalitarian regimes and future conflicts, including World War II and the Cold War. The author asserts that the ramifications of these events created ongoing instability around the globe.

4. Imperial Washington as a Global Menace: The United States' political decisions, particularly post-Cold War actions, are critiqued for perpetuating conflict instead of promoting peace. The author posits that George H. W. Bush's decision not to demobilize and reduce military spending following the Cold War prevented a lasting peace.

5. The Warfare State: The article illustrates the growth of the U. S. military presence worldwide, arguing that this extensive military apparatus fuels ongoing conflicts rather than ensuring security. The author refers to the constant search for external “monsters” as a rationale for military intervention.

6. Misguided Foreign Policy: The piece criticizes the narrative that external threats necessitate a strong military response, highlighting that many global conflicts have not posed direct threats to the U. S. homeland. It questions the logic behind interventionist policies and their devastating consequences.

7. Realities of the Modern Threat Landscape: Assessing contemporary security threats, the author argues that neither Russia nor China possess the capabilities to launch a successful invasion of the U. S. Rather, the current military posture is disproportionate to the actual threats, which are mostly the product of Washington's interventions.

8. Historical Lessons Ignored: The article draws parallels between the lessons from WWI and how they are overlooked today. It emphasizes that President Woodrow Wilson’s decision to engage in WWI fundamentally changed U. S. foreign policy and led to a cycle of militaristic responses instead of diplomatic resolutions.

9. Ukraine Conflict: The article discusses the ongoing war in Ukraine, suggesting that Western narratives mischaracterize the situation and perpetuate conflict. The author argues for the need to rethink interventionist policies that have led to unnecessary suffering and resource waste.

The article concludes that the legacy of World War I and the United States' misguided foreign policy choices have perpetuated a cycle of war and unrest. It advocates for a reassessment of the military-industrial complex and calls for policies that prioritize peace over intervention, suggesting that the lessons of history must be embraced to avoid repeating past mistakes. The need for rational discourse around security and military action is critical to end the cycle of warfare and ensure global stability. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-great-war-was-the-great-error/

“We are the Free World Now” — Europe Declares War on Free Speech

 The Trump Administration has taken significant steps against prominent figures in the European censorship movement, particularly targeting Thierry Breton, the former EU commissioner for digital policy. This action reflects a crucial response to perceived threats to American values, specifically freedom of speech.

• Secretary of State Marco Rubio has banned five individuals associated with European censorship from entering the U. S., emphasizing America's commitment to free speech.

• Raphael Glucksmann, a member of the European Parliament, expressed outrage at these sanctions, asserting that Europe must defend its laws and principles against U. S. actions.

• The European Union, through the Digital Services Act, is seen as promoting censorship standards that could affect American companies. Breton played a key role in this development, warning American business figures about potential consequences for non-compliance.

• U. S. figures, including Nina Jankowicz, have allied with European officials to encourage censorship, thereby raising concerns among free speech advocates in America.

• The article discusses the implications of a global governance model supported by some American elites, which could undermine national values.

• There have been warnings from officials like Justice Amy Coney Barrett about the erosion of free speech in countries like the UK, with calls for a more proactive U. S. stance against EU policies.

• Members of Congress, particularly from the Republican side, have advocated for a fight against the EU's globalization of censorship, but face opposition.

There is a contentious struggle over the definition of free speech in the 21st century. The actions taken by the Trump Administration signify a commitment to uphold American ideals against European pressures, amidst broader debates about the future of free expression globally.

https://jonathanturley.org/2025/12/29/we-are-the-free-world-now-europe-declares-war-on-free-speech/

Hundreds of Illinois Public Workers Implicated in Pandemic Fraud

 Flu cases on the rise amid holiday travel, gatherings, latest CDC data shows

Trump says US ‘hit’ dock in Venezuela, marking first known land attack

FBI, DHS escalate Minnesota fraud crackdown. Here’s everything you need to know

States get first awards from rural health fund

Kamala Harris Launches ‘Fight for the People’ PAC

Latvian Nationals, Here Illegally, Arrested for Alleged $14M Gift Card Fraud

Record Number Believe Health Care in ‘State of Crisis’ While Democrats Block Lowering Costs

American Manufacturing Win: Nvidia Acquires $5 Billion Stake in Intel

State officials and daycare manager push back on viral video fraud allegations in Minnesota

Unearthed surveillance exposes how parents were allegedly involved in Minnesota’s daycare fraud scheme

Nashville shooter Audrey Hale allegedly used federal student aid to buy guns for school attack

Hamas confirms five leaders killed, including ‘masked spokesperson’ in major blow to terror group

Number of Illegal entries into California plummets in 2025

Reintegration of Bible studies into schools reignites long-standing clash

Bondi announces 60 people have been convicted of fraud in four Minnesota scams so far

Netanyahu to award Trump the ‘Israel Prize’ for his contributions to the Jewish people

Nancy Pelosi reveals she didn’t intend to rip up Trump’s 2020 State of the Union speech

Two airliners nearly collide taking off from Houston’s Bush Intercontinental Airport

Somali Migrants Stalked Nick Shirley As He Exposed Alleged Fraud Schemes On Camera

Foreigners Scheme To Keep Their H-1Bs As Trump Admin Throttles Cheap Labor Pipeline

Hundreds Of Illinois Public Workers Implicated In Pandemic Fraud

Judge Orders Transcripts, Audio To Be Made Public From Hearing For Accused Charlie Kirk Assassin