CDC Fumbled Safety Monitoring of Covid “Vaccines” — Critics Call Fixes “Too Little, Too Late”

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) highlights significant shortcomings in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) monitoring of vaccine safety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Critics, including Children's Health Defense (CHD) representatives, argue that the proposed changes are insufficient.

1. Need for Improved Vaccine Safety Monitoring:

• The NASEM report criticizes the CDC for inadequate monitoring and communication of vaccine safety.

• It emphasizes the need for the Immunization Safety Office (ISO) to be independent from the CDC's promotional activities to increase trust in vaccine risk assessments.

2. Criticism from Experts:

• Brian Hooker from CHD describes the NASEM report as "too little, too late" and suggests it fails to address critical issues within the CDC.

• Hooker identifies leadership issues at NASEM regarding past vaccine safety evaluations, particularly concerning vaccines and autism.

3. ISO's Performance Assessment:

• The report reviewed ISO’s performance during the pandemic, praising its ability to identify several adverse events linked to vaccines.

• However, it noted gaps in communication that delayed public awareness of risks like myocarditis.

4. Evaluation of Surveillance Systems:

• The CDC used various systems, including VAERS and newer tools, to monitor vaccine safety but faced challenges in effectively sharing information across these platforms.

• Delays in reporting safety signals and unclear communication protocols were identified as significant issues.

5. Public Communication Issues:

• The report noted that CDC’s messaging was often unclear regarding the risks associated with COVID-19 vaccines, raising public skepticism.

• Experts believe this has led to a perception of bias because the CDC emphasized vaccine benefits without adequately addressing risks.

6. Recommendations for Improvement:

• NASEM advises better integration of health data systems and faster identification of safety signals.

• There are calls for improved transparency in how risks are communicated to both the public and health professionals.

• Recommendations include a push for the ISO to operate fully independently from CDC's vaccine promotion efforts.

7. General Consensus on Vaccine Benefits:

• Despite concerns about monitoring, NASEM emphasized the overall benefits of vaccines.

• The committee expressed a desire to ensure its focus on risks did not overshadow the established benefits of vaccination.

8. Next Steps and Independence:

• Experts recommend that vaccine safety data should be made accessible to independent researchers to bolster trust.

• There is a call to action for the ISO to become truly independent in its evaluations and not be influenced by vaccine promotion.

The NASEM report provides a critical assessment of the CDC's vaccine safety monitoring, identifying essential areas for improvement. While acknowledging the overall benefits of vaccination, experts argue that greater transparency, more streamlined data communication, and enhanced independence for safety monitoring are necessary to rebuild public trust. 

https://americafirstreport.com/cdc-fumbled-safety-monitoring-of-covid-vaccines-critics-call-fixes-too-little-too-late/