It's becoming increasingly difficult to discern fact from fiction, and unfortunately the media has a strong bias. They spin stories to make conservatives look bad and will go to great lengths to avoid reporting on the good that comes from conservative policies. There are a few shining lights in the media landscape-brave conservative outlets that report the truth and offer a different perspective. We must support conservative outlets like this one and ensure that our voices are heard.
Asheville nonprofit MountainTrue has landed a $750,000 grant to expand its river cleanup program after Hurricane Helene. The group has already pulled millions of pounds of debris from Western North Carolina waterways and will now scale operations into Tennessee rivers. The work protects drinking water, returns lost belongings to flood survivors, and sustains cleanup jobs as the region shifts from emergency response to long-term recovery.
The Washington Post has published an editorial blaming Democrats for the ongoing government shutdown, urging them to resolve the situation, which has resulted in potential food stamp program disruptions affecting millions.
1. Shutdown Blamed on Democrats: The Washington Post has openly stated that the prolonged government shutdown is primarily the fault of the Democrats, who are pushing for specific healthcare funding demands. They suggest that such debates should be postponed for another time.
2. Impact on Food Assistance: The editorial warns that essential programs like food stamps, which provide benefits to around 42 million people, are at risk of expiring. The Post emphasizes that keeping the government open should take precedence over ongoing policy disputes.
3. Historical Context: The editorial compares the current situation to a previous government shutdown instigated by Senator Ted Cruz, arguing that the Democrats are similarly holding the government hostage to secure their agenda.
4. Calls for a Solution: There is an indication that both chambers of Congress may be more motivated to reach a deal before their upcoming recess for Veterans Day.
5. Reactions from Left-Wing Readers: The editorial has sparked outrage among the Washington Post's left-leaning subscribers. Many have expressed disappointment, accusing the publication of abandoning its traditional stance or catering to conservative viewpoints. Comments from readers reflect a sense of betrayal and frustration, with some considering canceling their subscriptions.
In summary, the Washington Post's editorial asserts that the Democrats should take responsibility for the government shutdown and prioritize finding a resolution over their healthcare demands. The potential for widespread food assistance disruption highlights the urgency of the situation, while reactions from readers reveal a significant divide in opinion within their subscriber base.
A recent analysis proposes that the U. S. could raise significant capital by revaluing its gold reserves, which could lead to substantial financial and economic implications.
• The U. S. Federal Reserve currently holds about 261 million ounces of gold, valued at $42.22 per ounce, which has not changed since 1973.
• If the U. S. Treasury revalued this gold to market prices, it could add between $700 billion to $1 trillion to the U. S. balance sheet.
• The Bitcoin Act of 2025 includes provisions that could allow for this revaluation to finance a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.
• Historical precedent exists for such a move, notably when FDR changed the gold valuation from $20.67 to $35 per ounce in 1934.
• Given the current high debt-to-GDP ratio of approximately 120%, analysts speculate the U. S. could aim even higher with potential revaluation prices of $10,000 to $20,000 per ounce.
• A revaluation at $20,000 per ounce could provide the U. S. with an additional $5 trillion, enabling it to pay down about 18% of its national debt, thereby reducing interest payments and improving fiscal health.
• This strategy would also reinforce the U. S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency amid challenges posed by countries like China aiming to establish a gold-backed currency.
• The writer encourages investors to consider the opportunities that may arise from such a revaluation, hinting that those well-positioned will benefit significantly.
The idea of revaluing gold reserves as a strategy to mitigate U. S. debt is gaining attention, and it may create investment opportunities in precious metals. Those interested in this prospect can access a special investment report detailing potential high-reward investments in gold-related assets.
Recently, Senator Chuck Grassley released nearly 2,000 pages of subpoenas related to the Biden Justice Department's investigations of conservative groups and individuals. This document dump highlights the extensive efforts aimed at gathering information against supporters of former President Donald Trump.
• Nature of the Investigations: The subpoenas were issued by Special Counsel Jack Smith and covered various entities, including financial institutions, consulting firms, political action committees (PACs), and individuals. The goal was to find evidence against Trump and his supporters ahead of the 2024 election.
• Scope of Subpoenas: A total of 197 subpoenas were distributed, which included demands for banking data and communications from those targeted, including members of Congress, like Senator Ted Cruz.
• Loss of DOJ Personnel: All six attorneys who signed the subpoenas are no longer working for the Department of Justice (DOJ). This includes key figures such as Maria Vento, who signed over 100 subpoenas and was associated with the DOJ just months prior to her departure.
• Notable Attorneys: Erin B. Pulice, Brooke C. Watson, and Matthew Burke also signed significant subpoenas in the investigation. Burke's subpoenas involved communications from Trump campaign officials.
• Political Context: The document release and subsequent political actions have drawn criticism regarding the perceived weaponization of the DOJ against political opponents, particularly from conservative figures. Attorney General Pam Bondi has committed to addressing corruption within the DOJ and reviewing these investigations.
The release of the subpoenas by Senator Grassley underscores ongoing tensions surrounding investigations into Trump and his supporters. With significant personnel changes in the DOJ and accusations of biased investigations, the political landscape remains charged as the 2024 election approaches. The actions taken by the DOJ and its implications are central to current political discourse.
Recent claims made regarding an FBI investigation that allegedly targeted Donald Trump's campaign just weeks before the 2020 election. The investigation focused on potential misappropriations of campaign funds linked to casino gambling.
• Investigation Background: Pakistani Patel has shared documents with Congress revealing a 2020 FBI investigation aimed at establishing a criminal case against Donald Trump's campaign, focusing on payments to a vendor involved in casino gambling.
• October Surprise: The investigation memo, dated October 21, 2020, suggested that two weeks before the election, the FBI found connections between Trump's re-election campaign and possible campaign finance violations involving the vendor, American Made Media Consultants (AMMC).
• Key Findings:
• It was believed that a campaign official possibly used campaign funds for personal gambling trips at casinos.
• The memo was produced amid concerns about campaign finance practices that obscured about $170 million in campaign expenses.
• Evidence and Recommendations:
• The memo concluded that additional investigation was warranted, despite the FBI’s own admission of having a low confidence level in claims of misconduct.
• It included suspicions that a digital director of the campaign might have used campaign funds for gambling.
• Concerns Over AMMC: The FBI asserted that AMMC, which exclusively worked with the Trump campaign, was vulnerable to campaign finance crimes due to its lack of online presence despite receiving significant disbursements.
• Influential Figures: The Campaign Legal Center and other watchdog groups raised flags regarding AMMC's financial practices, which contributed to the scrutiny of the Trump campaign's funding transparency.
• Political Context:
• The investigation, labeled "Arctic Frost," was led by an openly critical FBI supervisor and later by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith, who treated efforts by Trump’s allies to sway election certification as a criminal conspiracy.
• Critics suggest that this line of inquiry reflects a political bias against Trump, equating it to prior allegations involving “political weaponization” within the FBI.
The FBI’s investigation into Donald Trump’s 2020 campaign suggests possible misuse of campaign funds linked to gambling activities. The timing and recommendations of the investigation have fueled debates about the integrity and impartiality of federal law enforcement in political matters. The situation raises questions regarding the balance between election oversight and political motives within government agencies, highlighting ongoing tensions in US political discourse.
The federal government has been shut down for a month, affecting many individuals and businesses. The shutdown is largely attributed to political decisions made by the Democratic minority in the Senate, who may hope to benefit politically from the ensuing hardships.
1. Affected Groups:
• Federal Employees: Many government workers are experiencing financial strain, as they are either not getting their paychecks or are uncertain about when they will receive back pay. While some employees have savings to fall back on, others are struggling to meet essential bills like rent and utilities.
• Welfare Recipients: Individuals dependent on federal assistance, such as SNAP, are also facing difficulties since their benefits are being halted. Many likely lack savings and are increasingly anxious about their financial situation.
2. Financial Consequences:
• The shutdown leads to unpaid bills and impacts spending habits. Federal employees and welfare recipients are not the only ones affected; businesses reliant on their spending are also suffering.
• Regular payments for mortgages, rent, and other expenditures are delayed, causing cash flow issues for banks and landlords and reducing revenue for grocery stores, restaurants, and other service providers.
3. Cultural and Economic Effects:
• Beyond financial distress, the shutdown affects cultural engagement, as people curtail spending on outings and entertainment. Money not spent during the shutdown doesn't simply get caught up later; lost revenue for businesses and local charities is permanent.
• Many small businesses, charities, and cultural institutions suffer during the shutdown because they miss out on regular patronage, which is often not reflected in broader economic statistics.
4. Political Responsibility:
• There is an argument that lawmakers, particularly Senate Democrats, have not fully understood the damage caused by the shutdown. Calls for quick resolution emphasize the need for elected officials to prioritize the economic well-being of their constituents rather than political maneuvering.
The government shutdown has wide-reaching consequences beyond just affecting government employees. The hardship extends to welfare recipients and significantly impacts many businesses and nonprofits that rely on consumer spending. For the health of both the economy and the community, a swift resolution to the shutdown is necessary. Lawmakers should focus on resolving the political standoff to allow normal economic activity to resume.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/10/government_shutdowns_and_economic_pain.html
In a recent Senate hearing, a Google executive acknowledged errors in managing content related to election fraud. This admission arose from allegations of government pressure on social media companies to censor certain speech during the elections.
1. Acknowledgment of Mistakes: A top Google official, Markham Erickson, confessed that the company made "mistakes" regarding its handling of election fraud content during questioning by Senator Ted Cruz.
2. Content Removal Case: Senator Cruz highlighted how YouTube removed a video that documented election fraud claims made by both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. The removal resulted in a "strike" against the video's creator, potentially risking their channel's existence.
3. Defense by Google: Erickson justified the video's removal based on an internal policy aimed at banning content alleging "widespread fraud" after election results were certified. However, he refrained from specifically acknowledging whether this case was indeed one of the mistakes he referred to.
4. Jawboning Allegations: The hearing focused on the concept of "jawboning," where the government allegedly pressures private firms to limit free speech. Both Google and Meta executives testified under oath about pressures from the Biden administration. They disagreed on their independence in making final content decisions but expressed concern over the coercion they faced.
5. Legislative Response: In light of the hearings, Senator Cruz announced plans to introduce the "Jawbone Act" to bring transparency to government communications with tech companies and allow citizens to seek legal remedies if they are censored due to government influence.
6. Historical Context: The discussion around government pressure to censor speech is informed by legal precedents, such as the 1963 Supreme Court decision in Bantam Books v. Sullivan, which held that government coercion to suppress speech violates the First Amendment.
7. Bipartisan Agreement: The hearing concluded with a rare consensus among the witnesses, including representatives from Google and Meta, on the need for legislation to enhance transparency and accountability concerning government interactions with social media platforms.
This Senate hearing has highlighted the ongoing tensions between government actions and free speech in the digital landscape. The admission of errors by Google amidst claims of governmental influence underscores the complexity of content moderation. The push for new legislation aims to protect citizens' rights and ensure the integrity of the digital public square in America.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-10-31-google-concedes-mistakes-election-in-content-moderation.html
Department of Energy (DOE) proposal that could significantly change how large data centers connect to the U. S. power grid. The DOE wants the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to take over interconnection decisions for data centers with a load of 20 MW or greater, streamlining the process. This proposal is intended to support the growth of artificial intelligence and domestic manufacturing, which require substantial electricity.
DOE Proposal: The DOE wants FERC to standardize how large data centers connect to the interstate transmission grid. This would involve FERC making the interconnection decisions, currently handled by regional transmission organizations or state agencies.
Government Rationale: The Energy Secretary, Chris Wright, links the plan to the government's goals for artificial intelligence and domestic manufacturing. He argues that these sectors need a lot of electricity and infrastructure investment.
Reactions and Concerns:
Mark Christie, a former FERC member, raises questions about reliability, cost to consumers, and federal overreach into state regulatory authority.
Travis Kavulla suggests utilities will resist the change.
The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) offered a general statement of support.
Co-location and Alternative Solutions: The DOE supports data centers co-locating with generation sources. An alternative solution, promoted by Advocates for Consumer Regulated Electricity (ACRE), is for data centers to directly contract for off-grid power, which is gaining some traction.
The DOE's proposal to federalize data center interconnection is facing scrutiny. The debate involves concerns about grid reliability, cost implications, and the balance of federal and state regulatory authority.
https://www.masterresource.org/free-market-electricity/doe-grid-policy-data-centers-new-thinking/
The article recounts personal experiences of systemic failures during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting how medical institutions acted against their patients' best interests. The author, Trish Dennis, reflects on a dialogue with Teresa Cichewicz and Gail Seiler, founders of the Betrayal Project, which aims to document and expose the breaches in healthcare during the pandemic and hold institutions accountable.
1. Personal Transition: The author expresses a profound shift in their perception of trust in public health and medical institutions from the pandemic onset in March 2020, identifying a concerning pattern of policies that stripped away patient rights and dignity.
2. The Betrayal Project: Created by Teresa and Gail, the Betrayal Project intends to highlight ethical violations and support families affected by these failures through documentation and advocacy. Their work aims to create a comprehensive factual record to challenge prevailing narratives.
3. Real-life Testimonials:
• Teresa Cichewicz's Experience: Her father, while needing oxygen, was placed on the COVID protocol without consent, resulting in a tragic outcome where he received inadequate care despite requests for alternative treatments.
• Jessica Halgren's Case: Jessica, a pregnant woman, suffered immensely under hospital treatment policies that led to her premature death after her baby was delivered, highlighting the lack of compassion and communication in healthcare practices.
• Gail Seiler's Struggle: Gail recounts her own ordeal in the hospital where she was isolated and denied proper treatment because of her vaccination status. Her husband fought to bring her home after realizing she was at risk due to hospital protocols.
4. Systemic Failures in Care: The article discusses how healthcare systems across the UK, Ireland, and the U. S. implemented policies that resulted in unnecessary deaths, particularly among the elderly, due to prioritizing bureaucratic processes over care.
5. Impact on Trust: The collective experiences shared demonstrate a widespread loss of trust in healthcare systems. Families were excluded from decision-making, and medical professionals often felt pressured to follow harmful protocols, leading to shared trauma for patients and their families.
6. Hope for Change: Despite the grim realities, the author conveys a sense of hope through grassroots movements, like the Betrayal Project, which work to demand accountability and create a framework for oversight of healthcare practices.
7. Call to Action: The article emphasizes that individuals play a crucial role in demanding accountability from those in power. Each person is encouraged to advocate for change by documenting injustices and supporting movements that challenge systemic failures.
The Betrayal Project serves as a beacon of hope, turning grief into advocacy for ethical healthcare practices. It stands as a reminder of the collective responsibility to bear witness to the failures of the past and strive toward a more compassionate future in medical care. The stories that have emerged speak to the urgent need for reflection, reform, and the commitment to restoring trust in healthcare.
A recent political situation highlights a crisis surrounding the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), impacting millions of Americans who rely on food assistance. Democratic leaders, particularly Senator Chuck Schumer, are facing criticism for their handling of government operations that led to the impending halt of SNAP benefits.
• SNAP Overview: SNAP, widely known as food stamps, provides financial support for groceries to over 42 million Americans, constituting about 12% of the U. S. population. Benefits average over $350 per household each month.
• Political Blame Game: Democrat Representative Melanie Stansbury accused the current administration of deliberately starving American children, asserting it has the funds available but is withholding them. However, CNN’s Jake Tapper pointed out that Senate Democrats voted multiple times to keep the government shut, contributing to the crisis.
• Democratic Priorities: The article argues that Democrats prioritize healthcare for undocumented immigrants over food assistance for struggling families. This choice could lead to severe backlash from their traditional supporters, as many who depend on SNAP may feel betrayed.
• Consequences of Benefit Cuts: If SNAP benefits cease, there could be significant social unrest. The article likens potential backlash from those affected to the government's own losses during the shutdown, suggesting that cutting off food assistance could lead to anger among constituents.
• Underlying Issues: The author asserts that a reliance on federal programs for sustenance highlights flaws in societal responsibility. Many individuals dependent on SNAP are described as able-bodied adults, indicating a need for a shift towards personal responsibility rather than reliance on government assistance.
• Government Financial Crisis: The article discusses the federal government's escalating debt, emphasizing that current spending habits, including SNAP, are unsustainable. Interest payments on national debt far exceed the SNAP budget, illustrating a significant problem in fiscal policy.
• Call for Responsibility: The underlying message is the need for individuals and the government to act responsibly. Continuous reliance on government assistance is viewed as detrimental to both society and the economy, with the call for a systemic change in how aid is provided and managed.
The current halt to SNAP benefits presents a critical challenge for Democrats who rely on support from affected communities. The debate reflects broader issues about government spending, individual responsibility, and the need to balance welfare with sustainable fiscal policy. Continued governmental shutdowns and management failures could have lasting implications for both the recipients of SNAP and the political landscape in the U. S.
https://spectator.org/dems-take-away-free-food-from-the-snapanese-at-great-political-risk/
Federal agents recently discovered that a significant percentage of employees at a New Jersey "bonded" warehouse were working illegally. This situation raises serious concerns about national security and corporate responsibility in the context of immigration enforcement.
• Arrests at the Warehouse: During a raid by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), it was revealed that 22% of the warehouse's employees lacked legal work status. These arrests were part of a broader Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation.
• Nature of Bonded Warehouses: Bonded warehouses are import-export facilities under strict federal regulation. They handle sensitive cargo and require workers to have reliable background checks due to the nature of the goods stored, which could include pharmaceuticals and electronics.
• Investigative Background: The arrests followed an investigation based on tips and irregularities in employment verification processes. The affected individuals were identified as coming from Latin America and working under false identities.
• Corporate Responsibility: The warehouse management could face fines or criminal charges if it is found that they knowingly employed illegal workers. This situation highlights potential negligence at various management levels.
• Broader Context of Immigration: The findings reflect a larger issue in the U. S. regarding immigration enforcement at the border and within the workforce. The number of illegal crossings has surged since 2021, creating challenges for federal immigration control, especially in states like New Jersey with high labor demands.
• Impact on American Workers: The presence of illegal workers is seen as a threat to American jobs, especially for lower-income individuals. Employers hiring these workers may save on labor costs but at the expense of legal compliance and local job availability.
The incident at the New Jersey bonded warehouse underscores significant weaknesses in both border security and corporate oversight in hiring practices. It illustrates a growing concern regarding illegal employment within key sectors and the overarching issues of immigration management in the United States.
China's manufacturing sector is facing serious difficulties, as demonstrated by a continuous decline in the manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI). This situation highlights the importance of establishing a trade agreement with the United States led by Donald Trump.
• Declining Manufacturing: China's manufacturing PMI fell to 49.0 in October, marking the seventh consecutive month of contraction. This indicates significant challenges for an economy largely dependent on exports and factory output.
• Economic Weakness: There is a decline in new orders, cooling global demand, and reduced factory output. Despite government efforts to support the economy through stimulus and infrastructure projects, the manufacturing sector remains weak, indicating a structural decline in China’s economy.
• Political Implications: Historically, China has relied on low labor costs and export surpluses to fuel growth. However, global trade tensions, particularly initiated during Trump’s first term with tariffs, have pressured Chinese manufacturing. Analysts suspect that actual economic conditions in China are worse than reported.
• Shift in Leverage: The ongoing weakness in China's economy means that it requires a trade deal with the U. S. more than the U. S. needs China. Trump’s strategies focus on reducing American dependence on Chinese goods, which is seen as smart business rather than protective nationalism.
• Impact on Americans: The decline in Chinese manufacturing affects U. S. consumers by influencing the availability and cost of goods. A healthier trade relationship could promote American job growth and less reliance on foreign production.
• Call for Real Assets: In light of global economic instability, investing in tangible assets like energy, food, and precious metals becomes crucial. These assets maintain value when production in foreign countries falters.
China’s economic troubles reflect broader issues of reliance on central planning in a competitive environment. Trump’s approach to trade emphasizes the need for economic independence, advocating for a revival of America’s manufacturing base. This vision is not just nostalgic but essential for a stable economic future in the U. S., as it seeks to protect its workers and economy against global vulnerabilities.
https://economiccollapse.report/china-manufacturing-slump-shows-why-they-need-a-deal-with-trump/
Central banks around the world are significantly increasing their gold purchases, and this trend is expected to continue into 2026. Despite rising gold prices, countries are stockpiling gold as a reaction to increasing doubt about the stability of fiat currencies.
1. Unprecedented Gold Buying: Central banks bought about 220 tons of gold in just the third quarter of the year, a record high. Countries like China, India, Turkey, Poland, and Singapore are among the active buyers, with Western central banks also increasing their gold reserves.
2. Eroding Trust in Fiat Currency: Central banks are shifting toward gold as they lose faith in the fiat currency system, which has relied on trust in governments and institutions. The global debt crisis—with over $50 trillion added since 2020—raises concerns about the long-term sustainability of paper money.
3. Gold’s Unique Value: Gold is viewed as a stable asset that cannot go bankrupt or be devalued like currency. It offers a level of security in times of financial instability, making it an attractive option for central banks, especially as some look to create digital currencies.
4. Geopolitical Factors and De-Dollarization: Nations, especially in the BRICS group, are eager to reduce dependence on the U. S. dollar, aiming to establish a trade system that relies more on gold. This trend reflects a shift towards a multipolar monetary system, impacting the U. S.'s economic leverage.
5. Concerns About Inflation and Economic Stability: Even if official inflation rates appear to decline, ongoing increases in everyday costs indicate that inflation remains a concern. Central banks are purchasing gold not just as a hedge but as a long-term insurance against economic collapse.
6. Future Prospects for Gold Demand: Factors such as increasing national debt, geopolitical tensions, and the rise of digital currencies are driving demand for gold. As currency becomes more virtual, tangible assets like gold are expected to gain value.
Central banks' aggressive gold buying signals a notable shift in their financial strategies, emphasizing the diminishing trust in fiat currencies. This trend suggests a growing recognition of the importance of real assets like gold for ensuring financial stability in the coming years. Investors should take note of these changes as they may indicate a broader economic transformation away from reliance on paper money.
https://discernmoney.com/the-real-reason-central-banks-will-keep-buying-gold-in-2026/
John Merline addresses the substantial tax burden Californians face in comparison to Virginia, focusing on the value received from these taxes in relation to services, crime, education, infrastructure, economic opportunity, and government accountability in the state.
1. Increased Tax Burden: After moving to California, Merline observed a significant increase in his tax payments. His state income taxes rose by over 33%, with California having higher sales and gasoline taxes compared to Virginia.
2. Crime Rates: Despite having similar numbers of police officers per capita, California has a much higher crime index (47% worse than Virginia) and ranks sixth in violent crime among all states.
3. Education System: Although California offers higher salaries for teachers and lower student-to-teacher ratios, students' performance in reading, math, science, and writing is below the national average. Virginia performs better in these areas, ranking higher in SAT scores.
4. Infrastructure Issues: California's high gasoline taxes have not resulted in better infrastructure; the state is near the bottom in road conditions, with a large percentage of roads in poor shape. Virginia has a much better road maintenance record.
5. Economic Opportunity: California ranks last in economic opportunity and has the highest unemployment rate in the country at 5.5%. The state also leads in welfare dependency and homelessness while having serious issues with income inequality.
6. Fiscal Responsibility: California ranks poorly in fiscal stability despite high tax revenues. The state struggles with budget gaps and significant debt, estimated at nearly half a trillion dollars.
7. Government Waste and Mismanagement: Numerous examples illustrate mismanagement and waste, such as ineffective spending on homelessness and failed infrastructure projects. Merline cites specific instances where taxpayer money was poorly allocated or lost entirely.
8. Political Accountability: Merline questions why Californians continue to elect officials responsible for these failures and worries that many citizens may not realize the extent of the mismanagement.
The article criticizes California's high taxes versus the low quality of services received, particularly in safety, education, and infrastructure. It urges Californians to recognize their challenges and to reconsider their political choices, highlighting the state's beauty and potential if managed better.
https://issuesinsights.com/2025/10/31/do-californians-realize-how-badly-theyre-getting-ripped-off/
On Thursday, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem revealed significant arrests related to illegal immigrants driving on U. S. roads, specifically focusing on semi-truck operators.
• Authorities arrested 233 illegal aliens, including 146 drivers, in Northwest Indiana as part of Operation Widway Blitz.
• Of the arrested, 46 were semi-truck drivers.
• Many of the illegal drivers held Commercial Driver's Licenses from various states, particularly sanctuary states like California and Illinois.
• Criminal activities linked to these arrests include drug trafficking, DUI, theft, and more.
• Recent incidents involving illegal immigrant drivers have resulted in fatal crashes in California and Florida.
Noem emphasized the dangers posed by illegal drivers to citizens, stating, “your days are numbered” if driving illegally on U. S. highways.
On October 30, 2025, President Trump called for Republican Senators to utilize the "nuclear option" to eliminate the filibuster as the government faced a prolonged shutdown under Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. Trump expressed his views through a series of statements highlighting the current political situation and the actions he believes are necessary to address it.
1. Current Situation:
• The government has been shut down for 30 days with no resolution.
• President Trump stated that the Democrats are responsible for the shutdown and referred to their behavior as "crazy. "
2. Call for Action:
• Trump urged Senate Republicans to invoke the "nuclear option" to end the filibuster, which requires 60 votes to terminate.
• He emphasized that eliminating the filibuster would allow Republicans to reclaim and utilize power effectively.
3. Concerns About Democrats:
• Trump criticized the Democrats for allegedly wanting to reallocate healthcare funds to illegal immigrants.
• He described the Democrats as "Crazed Lunatics" disconnected from reality.
4. International Perspective:
• During a recent trip to Asia, Trump mentioned he was asked about the government shutdown by various international leaders, which highlighted America's diminished status under current circumstances.
• He asserted that respect for America has been restored during his administration.
5. Consequences of Inaction:
• Trump warned that inaction will lead to detrimental changes in U. S. governance if Democrats regained power, including plans to expand the Supreme Court and adjust state representation.
• He argued that Democrats have historically fought to eliminate the filibuster and would likely do so again if given the chance.
6. Republican Strategy:
• Trump encouraged Republicans to seize the current political opportunity by removing the filibuster.
• He noted past failures to end the filibuster due to Democratic Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, indicating the importance of unifying Republican action.
7. Long-term Implications:
• If the filibuster is not removed, Trump cautioned that it would allow Democrats to implement significant changes detrimental to Republican interests and governance.
Trump's statements reflect a critical point in the political landscape surrounding the ongoing government shutdown, emphasizing a push for legislative changes by the Republican party. His call to eliminate the filibuster underscores a belief that this step is necessary to prevent future Democratic advancements and to leverage Republican power for immediate governance reforms.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/10/just-president-trump-calls-senate-initiate-nuclear-option/
The upcoming mayoral election in New York City has caught national attention as Zohran Mamdani, a self-identified socialist and pro-Islamist, is poised to become the city’s mayor. Concerns are being raised about his views and associations and their implications for American values.
1. Mamdani's Political Stance: Mamdani aligns himself with socialist and Islamist ideologies, which some believe challenge core American principles. His campaign includes connecting his identity to the Muslim community, using the aftermath of 9/11 to highlight perceived anti-Muslim sentiment.
2. Controversial Associations: Mamdani has been seen with Imam Siraj Wahhaj, a figure with a controversial past linked to terrorism. Despite these associations, Mamdani praises Wahhaj as a significant community leader, raising alarm among critics.
3. Cultural Shifts: The changes Mamdani represents are not limited to New York City. Other areas, like Hamtramck, Michigan, have also seen significant Muslim political representation, with an all-Muslim city council making decisions that reflect cultural shifts.
4. National Impact: The rise of Mamdani and similar political figures may indicate broader changes in American society, moving away from the traditional melting pot identity toward a more segmented cultural landscape.
5. Immigration Policy Concerns: Discussions are growing around the need for stronger immigration controls. Suggestions include reevaluating birthright citizenship, diversity visa programs, and ensuring adherence to policies that promote national security.
6. Call to Action for Republicans: It is emphasized that Republicans must confront immigration and cultural issues directly. Congress is urged to enact laws that ensure security and address challenges posed by high levels of immigration.
7. Broader Implications: The current political climate raises questions about the future of American identity and values. Concerns include accommodating views that seek to redefine the American Dream and democracy.
The impending election of Zohran Mamdani in New York City serves as a focal point for discussions about cultural transformation and immigration in the United States. Critics believe that the rise of figures like Mamdani poses a threat to American values and call for significant legislative actions to secure the nation’s identity and principles. The situation remains a critical juncture in the ongoing discourse about what it means to be American in a rapidly changing society.
The perceptions and narratives surrounding immigration enforcement policies in the U. S., particularly those enacted under Trump's administration. It critiques how certain media outlets portray these policies and the individuals affected, arguing that such portrayals misrepresent both the facts and the broader context of immigration issues.
1. Media Representation of Immigration Policies:
• Many Americans feel Trump's immigration policies are excessively harsh, partly due to misleading media coverage that suggests innocent families are being targeted.
• Critics argue that the media often depicts law enforcement actions as oppressive rather than necessary for public safety.
2. Role of Politicians and Media:
• The credibility of politicians is questioned, alleging that they are treated as champions of truth by the media, despite their motivations being focused on power and money.
• The content suggests that media narratives create a distorted reality, painting law enforcement in a negative light while ignoring essential facts.
3. Examples of Misrepresentation:
• Instances were cited where dangerous individuals, such as criminals and those with a history of violence, are presented as sympathetic figures in news stories.
• Specific arrests are described as unjust, neglecting to mention that those arrested had active deportation orders or criminal backgrounds.
4. Legal Enforcement vs. Freedom of Speech:
• The piece emphasizes that arrests for violent acts, like throwing bricks at federal agents, are lawful and should not be framed as violations of free speech.
• It also notes that the First Amendment protects peaceful protest, but violent actions should face legal consequences.
5. Public Sentiment and Trust in Media:
• Despite concerns over enforcement tactics, support for Trump's immigration policies remains relatively strong among Americans.
• The increase in illegal immigration appears to contribute to a growing skepticism towards media representations of these policies.
6. Conclusions Drawn:
• The article concludes that politicians and the media share a responsibility for the public's confusion regarding immigration enforcement.
• It warns against accepting the media's narrative at face value, advocating for a clearer understanding of the issues involved.
The content presents a critical view of how immigration enforcement, particularly under Trump's policies, is covered by the media. It argues that this coverage often lacks necessary context and creates misinformation about law enforcement actions. By highlighting the factual circumstances surrounding arrests and the depiction of individuals involved, the piece calls for a more accurate and nuanced discussion on immigration issues.
As the Schumer shutdown continues, pressure is mounting on Democrats. Airline CEOs are advocating for a clean continuing resolution (CR) due to potential delays and cancellations in air travel, especially as air traffic controllers work without pay. Major airline pilots' unions have supported this request, and it's noteworthy that even executives from progressive companies like United Airlines are voicing this concern.
American and Delta Airlines, known for their liberal values, have joined the call. The Democrats face growing public dissatisfaction since air travel impacts many Americans directly, contrasting with previous shutdowns focused on less universally relevant issues. The White House is effectively communicating the situation, stressing that Democrats have previously stated a clean CR is essential, making their current position increasingly indefensible.
The Justice Department is investigating leaders of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) organization over claims of mismanaging millions of dollars in donations made during the protests following George Floyd's death in 2020. This inquiry is focused on how these funds were handled and has gained renewed attention recently.
• Ongoing Investigation: Federal prosecutors are looking into possible fraudulent activities concerning the donor funds, which amounted to over $90 million during the protests.
• Nature of the Probe: The U. S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California is leading the investigation, which involves examining whether foundation leaders improperly managed the donations.
• Subpoenas and Search Warrants: Investigators have already issued subpoenas and conducted at least one search warrant as part of their investigation.
• BLM's Position: The Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation has stated that it is not a target of any federal criminal investigation and emphasizes its commitment to transparency.
• Investigative Context: Initiated during the Biden administration, the investigation has gained more focus under the Trump administration, and it may also include other advocacy groups involved in the 2020 demonstrations.
The investigation into the financial management of donations by BLM leaders continues, raising concerns over accountability in the handling of substantial funds raised during a significant movement in U. S. history. The outcome remains unclear, as no charges have been officially filed yet.
A recent study published by the British Medical Journal examines the financial contributions of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) to the World Health Organization (WHO) from 2000 to 2024. The study highlights how a significant portion of these funds has been allocated to polio vaccinations, despite questions regarding the effectiveness and appropriateness of this focus in improving global health.
1. BMGF's Funding Role:
• The BMGF is the second-largest funder of the WHO, providing 9.5% of WHO's income between 2010 and 2023.
• Out of the $4.5 billion BMGF contributed to WHO for infectious diseases, $3.2 billion (58.9%) went specifically to polio, despite polio being a small part of the global disease burden.
2. Polio Transmission and Sanitation:
• Polio is primarily spread through the fecal-oral route and not through respiratory contact.
• Advances in sanitation and clean water access have significantly reduced polio cases in Western nations, indicating that improving sanitation may be more effective than vaccination alone.
3. Ineffectiveness of Current Strategies:
• The study suggests that most of BMGF's funding does not strengthen global healthcare or address broader health issues effectively.
• Current strategies have resulted in a rise of vaccine-derived polio cases, raising concerns about the effectiveness of the vaccination campaigns.
4. Polio Parasitic Cases:
• In 2024, there were 289 reported cases of paralytic polio worldwide, suggesting actual infection rates may range substantially higher, with 95% of infections being asymptomatic.
• The reported statistics indicate very low incidences of paralytic polio, raising doubts about the justification for large-scale vaccination campaigns.
5. Investment vs. Outcome:
• Gates invested $889 million in polio eradication in 2024, amounting to about $3 million spent per case of paralytic polio.
• Critics question whether this expenditure aligns with global health priorities, particularly regarding sanitation.
6. Gates's Commitment to Polio Eradication:
• Bill Gates emphasized his commitment to finishing polio eradication efforts, but the feasibility of this goal is debated given the current realities of polio transmission links to vaccination.
7. Concerns About WHO’s Direction:
• The WHO has increasingly accepted private funding, leading to potential conflicts of interest and corruption, undermining the organization's original mission.
• Critics call for a reevaluation of WHO's structure, suggesting that nations consider withdrawing from the organization, as it has deviated from representing member state interests.
The focus of the Gates Foundation and WHO on polio eradication through vaccination raises significant concerns about financial priorities, the effectiveness of current health strategies, and potential conflicts of interest within WHO. The dialogue around how to best tackle global health challenges continues, with an emphasis on the need for improved sanitation and infrastructure to address the root causes of diseases like polio. The situation calls for a reassessment of global health strategies that prioritize foundational public health measures.
Research conducted by Open the Books has discovered that almost $200 million in federal healthcare-related grants has been allocated for programs serving illegal immigrants since the fiscal year 2021. This amount does not include indirect Medicaid spending or education costs associated with illegal immigrants. The findings highlight a significant debate regarding federal funds usage for healthcare among these populations.
1. Total Funding: From fiscal year 2021 to now, illegal immigrants have received at least $197 million in federal healthcare grants. This does not count the additional estimated $27 billion in indirect Medicaid spending or $70 billion annually for education that supports illegal immigrants and their children.
2. Source of Discrepancies: Despite claims from some officials that illegal immigrants cannot access federal funds, the $200 million accounts for grants clearly labeled for "undocumented" individuals. The actual total of federal spending on illegal immigrants is likely higher.
3. Focus on Vulnerable Populations: The healthcare funds are mainly directed toward programs for vulnerable groups including the homeless and those with substance use issues. However, including illegal immigrants in these programs can impact funding intended for low-income Americans.
4. Research Grants: Over $18 million has been allocated for health-related studies involving illegal immigrants. These projects aim to improve healthcare accessibility and address health equity. Specific grants include:
• Over $4 million to Stanford University to study the effects of basic income on cancer risk in undocumented populations.
• $2.4 million to UCLA to research reproductive healthcare access for undocumented Asian women.
5. Direct Programmatic Spending: Most funding comes from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which contributed about $182 million. The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) alone provided at least $75.6 million in grants for healthcare serving illegal immigrants, largely through the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Bureau.
6. State-Specific Funding: California has received the highest amount of federal tax dollars for illegal immigrant healthcare, totaling approximately $65.5 million, with Florida and D. C. following behind with $26 million and $22 million, respectively.
7. Congressional Earmarks: There are also specific projects funded by Congressional earmarks intended to support healthcare for illegal immigrants. These include grants for hospitals and programs focused on high immigrant populations.
8. Cost of Indirect Support: The total costs associated with illegal immigration extend further, with estimates suggesting illegal immigration costs taxpayers around $150.7 billion annually across all government levels.
9. Immigration Enforcement: Under the Biden administration, there have been significant expenditures aimed at enrolling illegal immigrants in state Medicaid programs. This includes efforts to connect undocumented individuals with healthcare options.
10. Debate on Immigration Policy: The debate continues regarding the balance between providing healthcare and services to illegal immigrants versus the needs of legal residents and citizens. The reported spending drives discussions about accountability and the necessity for transparency in government funding allocation.
Overall, the reported $197 million in federal healthcare support for illegal immigrants highlights a complex issue surrounding immigration, healthcare access, and resource allocation. This expenditure is dwarfed by larger indirect spending estimates and reflects ongoing challenges in managing immigration policy and funding priorities. As the situation evolves, the implications for taxpayers and healthcare services will remain critical topics of discussion.
Steve Kirsch discusses a new report from the McCullough Foundation, which claims that vaccines are the primary cause of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This report has sparked controversy and is expected to be ignored by mainstream media.
1. Main Claim: The report concludes that routine childhood vaccinations, especially when given early and in combination, are the largest modifiable risk factor for autism.
2. Research Methodology: The report is a synthesis of existing literature, not new data. It compiles studies from various sources, focusing on both vaccine-related and non-vaccine factors influencing autism.
3. Contrasting Views: The McCullough report's findings differ significantly from those of prestigious institutions like the Lancet and NIH, which rely on stricter methodologies.
4. Evidence Interpretation: While mainstream reports require strong statistical backing, the McCullough report emphasizes biological plausibility, leading to divergent conclusions.
5. Boxed Examples: Personal anecdotes highlight cases where parents believe vaccines are linked to autism, contrasting with clinics that report no autism cases among unvaccinated children.
The debate over the causes of autism continues, centered around differing interpretations of evidence. The key question remains: which evidence framework is more credible regarding the link between vaccines and autism?
Watch Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfFv5YkrgGs
What exactly is the trade deficit - and should you be worried about it? Does it really mean America is “losing” in global trade, or is the scoreboard misleading us? Read more about the trade deficit here: https://fee.org/articles/a-deficit-of... https://fee.org/articles/milton-fried... Visit FEE.org and our Substack: https://substack.com/@thefreemanmag for more! Sources: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-t... https://www.hoover.org/research/clear... https://www.cato.org/blog/bad-solutio... https://www.cato.org/blog/ignore-poli... https://www.cato.org/trade-policy-ana... https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-eco... https://www.industryweek.com/the-econ... https://www.cato.org/commentary/remem...
Watch Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUKHD5iEc6Y
Politicians often claim that if the rich just “paid their fair share,” we could fund everything from free college to universal healthcare. But economics - and history - tell a different story. In this video, we break down why “taxing the rich” isn’t the silver bullet it sounds like. From France’s failed millionaire tax to JFK and Reagan’s pro-growth reforms, we’ll explore how high tax rates often backfire by discouraging investment, driving people away, and shrinking the economy. You’ll also learn who actually pays the majority of U.S. taxes, why the math doesn’t add up for wealth taxes, and what real prosperity looks like when incentives are aligned. Learn more by going to FEE.org or our Substack: https://thefreemanmag.substack.com/ Sources: Taxes and Growth: A Cautionary Graph — Brookings Institution https://www.brookings.edu/articles/ta... History Shows Raising Top Tax Rates Doesn’t Lead to Revenue Windfalls — National Taxpayers Union Foundation https://www.ntu.org/foundation/detail... Taxes Have Consequences: An Income Tax History of the United States — EconLib https://www.econlib.org/taxes-have-co... The Reagan Tax Cuts: Lessons for Tax Reform — Joint Economic Committee (U.S. Congress) https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/ind... Revenue Effects of a 70 Percent Top Tax Rate — Penn Wharton Budget Model https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu... Summary of the Latest Federal Income Tax Data, 2023 Update — Tax Foundation https://taxfoundation.org/publication... France Forced to Drop 75% Supertax After Meagre Returns — The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/world/201... Don’t Forget About Migration’s Long-term Implications — Pacific Research Institute https://www.pacificresearch.org/dont-... Why Europe Axed Its Wealth Taxes — Cato Institute https://www.cato.org/commentary/why-e... The Law — Frédéric Bastiat (via FEE) https://fee.org/resources/the-law/
A recent study has highlighted significant misuse of taxpayer money intended to combat homelessness in the United States. It suggests that these funds have been redirected towards political causes associated with radical left agendas rather than addressing the homelessness crisis.
• Study Findings: The investigation, titled “Infiltrated,” backed by the Capital Research Center and Discovery Institute, reveals corruption in the homelessness sector. Billions of dollars meant to help homeless individuals have instead supported political activism.
• Homelessness Industrial Complex: The report describes a network of nonprofits and activists that, while purporting to help the homeless, have become dependent on the perpetuation of homelessness for their financial gain. This system has evolved into what is termed the "Homelessness Industrial Complex. "
• Exploitation of Vulnerable Populations: The study argues that many advocates are more focused on maintaining their jobs and political influence than genuinely addressing homelessness. The funds meant for the homeless are often funneled into efforts that support the election of Democrats and other political causes.
• Call for Accountability: Bill Essayli, a special U. S. attorney in California, is reportedly investigating these claims, with advocates calling for a national audit of the funds devoted to homelessness assistance.
The investigation suggests a troubling pattern where organizations claiming to help the homeless may be prioritizing their interests over those of the vulnerable population they are supposed to serve. This misuse of funds undermines efforts to effectively combat homelessness in the U. S., warranting a reevaluation of how taxpayer dollars are allocated. Taking action to ensure these funds are used appropriately is deemed essential to genuinely mitigate the homelessness crisis rather than allowing political agendas to thrive.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/10/study-reveals-taxpayer-funds-meant-end-homelessness-are/
U. S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping held a significant meeting on the sidelines of the APEC Summit in Busan, South Korea. This event marked their first in-person summit in six years and is expected to impact U. S.-China trade relations.
1. Meeting Outcome: Trump described the meeting as "amazing" and rated it a 12 out of 10, signaling strong optimism about the future relationship between the two nations.
2. Trade Concessions:
• China agreed to resume purchases of large quantities of U. S. soybeans, providing relief to American farmers.
• The U. S. will cut tariffs on fentanyl-related imports from China from 20% to 10%.
• Beijing announced it would temporarily suspend rare-earth export controls for one year.
3. Tariff Truce: Both leaders agreed to roll back some existing tariffs and restrictions, aiming to ease trade barriers between the countries.
4. Negotiations on Technology: Trump discussed Chinese access to Nvidia’s AI chips but noted that he would not allow access to the Blackwell line. The issue surrounding TikTok is also set to be resolved in the future.
5. Future Meetings: Plans for Trump to visit China in April were mentioned, as both leaders aim to strengthen their cooperation and resolve disputes.
The meeting between Trump and Xi resulted in several trade concessions and an optimistic outlook for future relations. While the leaders expressed positive sentiments, analysts caution that the outcomes may lack significant depth, with many details already anticipated by the market. Despite this, the talks signify a commitment to improving U. S.-China relations and may lead to a broader trade agreement in the future.
The Trump administration has ramped up investigations into the financial and operational aspects of Antifa, a far-left extremist group, fueling discussions on whether it should be labeled a foreign terrorist organization. Following a violent incident involving Antifa, President Trump declared the group a domestic terrorist organization and suggested that it should also be designated as a foreign terrorist group.
• Executive Order and Incident: On September 22, Trump declared Antifa a domestic terrorist organization after a shooting at an event in Utah that resulted in the death of a conservative influencer. The alleged shooter left messages on bullet casings, highlighting the ongoing tensions and violence associated with the group.
• Interest in Foreign Terror Designation: During an October 8 discussion, Trump expressed support for the idea of designating Antifa as a foreign terrorist organization. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller endorsed this step due to Antifa's alleged international ties.
• National Response: Senator Eric Schmitt from Missouri believes a foreign terrorist designation is necessary, citing evidence of Antifa's network of safe houses and international operations. He urged Secretary of State Marco Rubio to act on this issue but received no immediate response due to the ongoing government shutdown.
• Criticism of Designation: Representatives like Bennie Thompson criticized the move to label Antifa as a terrorist organization, arguing it represents government overreach and is a tactic to suppress dissent. Some Democrats suggested that Antifa’s involvement in riots is exaggerated or nonexistent.
• Antifa's Historical Context: Antifa's roots trace back to opposition against fascism, with its modern manifestation emerging from various anti-fascist movements. Members often dress in black to conceal their identities during protests.
• Overseas Links: Schmitt's letter to Rubio emphasized that Antifa functions as an organized international network rather than a collection of independent domestic actors. Recent protests in Atlanta revealed connections to groups from other countries, including Canada and France.
• Financial Support and Operations: Antifa allegedly receives funding from NGOs and crowdfunding sources to support its activities. The International Anti-Fascist Defence Fund (IAFD) is one such group that provides financial assistance in various international locations.
• Call for Action: Intelligence experts like Ammon Blair note that designating Antifa as a foreign terrorist organization could enhance intelligence gathering and enable the government to disrupt funding and resources for the group.
• International Reactions: Some European politicians also support labeling Antifa a terrorist organization, reflecting a transnational concern over its activities.
The ongoing debate over Antifa's classification reveals a broader conflict regarding political violence in the U. S. and the balance between security measures and civil liberties. While some officials advocate for stricter designations and international actions against the group, others view these measures as excessive and potentially harmful to democratic discourse. The outcomes of these discussions could significantly affect the ways in which political dissent and extremist activities are dealt with in the future.
The Biden administration has faced serious allegations regarding its surveillance of Republican members of Congress as part of an investigation called "Arctic Frost. " Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley has revealed that nearly 20% of Senate Republicans were included in a wide-reaching campaign involving numerous subpoenas aimed at gathering information.
• Allegations of Surveillance: Senator Chuck Grassley disclosed that 197 subpoenas were issued as part of the Arctic Frost investigation. These subpoenas targeted over 400 Republicans, organizations, and even media companies.
• Scope of Subpoenas: The subpoenas sought confidential materials, including communications involving conservative groups like Turning Point USA, as well as personal data from GOP donors and strategists.
• Political Reaction: Several Republican senators, including Ted Cruz, expressed outrage, likening the investigation to the Watergate scandal and calling for accountability from the Biden administration.
• Media Targets: The investigation reportedly included media outlets such as CBS, Fox News, and Newsmax, along with influential individuals close to Trump.
• Investigation Details: Newly released documents indicate that the FBI conducted interviews across the country and sought funding for additional investigative travel.
• Call for Accountability: House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan has emphasized the need to investigate the political motives behind the operation and has requested testimony from Jack Smith, the lead investigator.
The disclosures surrounding the Arctic Frost investigation raise significant questions about the extent of government surveillance and potential political bias in law enforcement. The ongoing discussions highlight the growing concerns among Republicans about accountability and transparency within the Biden DOJ. Further investigations and testimonies are anticipated as this situation unfolds.
