Pete Hegseth Under Attack in Latest Leak to The Wall Street Journal

 Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is facing criticism after reports emerged that he brought his wife, Jennifer Hegseth, to meetings with foreign military representatives where sensitive topics were discussed.

• Anonymous sources informed The Wall Street Journal that Jennifer Hegseth attended two significant meetings with her husband, which included discussions with U. K. Secretary of Defense John Healey and other military officials.

• The first meeting took place at the Pentagon in early March, right after the U. S. decided to halt military intelligence sharing with Ukraine, making the discussions particularly sensitive.

• Spouses of high-ranking officials typically have some level of security clearance, but it is unclear if Jennifer Hegseth has one.

• While Defense Secretaries can invite guests to meetings, attendance lists are usually restricted to people with necessary clearances due to the classified nature of the discussions.

• Hegseth has been criticized not only for this incident but also for his management of sensitive military information, including a recent controversy dubbed “Signalgate. ”

• In “Signalgate,” Hegseth was involved in discussions regarding military strikes on Houthi terrorists in Yemen through a chat group where sensitive information may have been inadvertently shared with a journalist.

The leaks about Pete Hegseth's meetings raise concerns over the handling of sensitive military discussions, particularly involving unapproved attendees, and highlight ongoing scrutiny surrounding his role as Defense Secretary. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/pete-hegseth-under-attack-latest-leak-wall-street/

Rep. Darrell Issa Discusses No Rogue Rulings Act to Limit District Court Judges’ Power – House Judiciary Committee Holds Hearing on Judge Brian Boasberg’s Deportation Block Tuesday

 Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) introduced the No Rogue Rulings Act, aiming to restrict federal judges from issuing broad nationwide injunctions. This legislation is set to be voted on by the House, coinciding with a hearing on judicial powers impacting the President's agenda.

• The No Rogue Rulings Act will limit district court judges' ability to issue nationwide injunctions unless two states from separate judicial circuits are involved.

• The House Judiciary Committee, led by Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH), will hold a hearing titled “Judicial Overreach and Constitutional Limits on the Federal Courts. ”

• The focus of the hearing will be District Court Judge James Boasberg, who recently extended a temporary restraining order related to the Alien Enemies Act, affecting the President's deportation efforts.

• President Trump criticized Judge Boasberg's decisions and suggested revoking his security clearance for his actions.

• Issa's bill proposes that if a nationwide injunction is necessary, a panel of three randomly chosen judges will determine its issue, allowing for direct appeals to the Supreme Court.

• Issa emphasized that district court judges should be limited to their local jurisdictions and should not overstep their authority.

• The bill is seen as a step to reaffirm congressional power and ensure the Supreme Court’s authority is not preempted by individual judges' rulings.

Rep. Issa's legislation seeks to clarify the scope of district court judges' powers and prevent judicial overreach that could disrupt federal policies. The upcoming House vote and Judiciary Committee hearing reflect ongoing tensions regarding the judicial branch's authority in relation to executive actions.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/video-rep-darrell-issa-discusses-no-rogue-rulings/

How Donald Trump Is Reshaping America in Just 7 Weeks

 The content covers various topics related to the American political landscape, focusing particularly on the early weeks of Donald Trump's administration and the implications of his policies. Commentary from Victor Davis Hanson highlights economic measures, immigration issues, and significant political events.

1. Trump Administration's Initial Period:

• Victor Davis Hanson characterizes the first seven weeks of the Trump presidency as a time for major change aimed at disrupting the status quo.

• There is a focus on the potential long-term benefits of Trump's actions, despite immediate challenges and media skepticism.

2. Economic Insights:

• Trump’s discussion of tariffs has led to substantial investment announcements from various countries, potentially boosting job creation.

• U. S. oil production has increased significantly, from approximately 9 million barrels a day when Trump took office to anticipated levels of 14 million barrels shortly.

3. Border Security Success:

• The Trump administration has seemingly improved border security, drastically reducing illegal crossings.

• There is ongoing discussion about the status of undocumented immigrants and the implications of past policies under the Biden administration.

4. Government Spending and Budget Issues:

• Elon Musk's findings about potential wasteful spending within government agencies could lead to significant budget cuts.

• Trump’s goal is to cut a trillion dollars in spending while maintaining entitlements, albeit with skepticism regarding feasibility.

5. Potential for Historical Impact:

• If Trump fulfills his various promises, including the $4 trillion in foreign investment, resolving the Ukraine conflict, and achieving peace in the Middle East, his presidency could be viewed as highly significant in recent history.

As developments unfold under the Trump administration, there are high stakes for both economic and political changes in the U. S. The commentary urges a calm approach while noting that successful implementation of current policies could lead to a more prosperous future for the country.

https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/03/28/how-donald-trump-is-reshaping-america-in-just-7-weeks/

Why Do Democrats Hate Women and Girls?

 In this article, Brian C. Joondeph discusses perceived contradictions in the Democratic Party's stance on women's rights, particularly regarding transgender issues and their effects on women and girls in sports.

1. Democratic Narrative on Women:

The Democratic Party claims to support women's equality but is accused of actions that contradict this narrative. Joondeph argues that issues like abortion and transgenderism highlight this contradiction.

2. Abortion as a War on Women:

Joondeph points out that abortion takes the lives of potential female babies, which raises questions about the party's commitment to protecting women.

3. Transgender Policy Impact on Female Athletes:

The article discusses the physical advantages male athletes have over females and asserts that allowing transgender women to compete against biological women creates unfair competition. He emphasizes the risks involved, especially in contact sports.

4. Examples of Unfair Competition:

Specific cases are mentioned, such as a transgender woman outperforming biological women in boxing and a serious injury to a female volleyball player caused by a transgender girl spiking the ball.

5. Democratic Response:

Joondeph criticizes Democrats for voting against legislation aimed at protecting women in sports, arguing this indicates a lack of support for women's rights.

6. Abuse in Schools:

The article describes an incident where middle school girls were forced to change in front of a transgender-identifying boy, likening it to a form of sexual abuse and questioning the reaction of women's rights advocates.

7. Republican Positioning:

He suggests that Republicans are attempting to restore common sense to women's sports, contrasting it with Democrats' policies that he interprets as detrimental to women.

Joondeph concludes that the actions of Democrats, particularly regarding women's sports and protections, lead to the perception that they do not truly support women and girls. He questions the motivations of educated women voters who support these policies despite their consequences.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/03/why_do_democrats_hate_women_and_girls.html

Trump administration CUTS FUNDING to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance – a major blow to the Bill Gates-backed entity

 The Trump administration has decided to stop U. S. taxpayer funding for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, which has significant backing from Bill Gates. This decision follows concerns regarding Gavi's management and effectiveness in global health initiatives.

• The funding cut was deemed necessary due to foreign aid programs being inconsistent with national interests.

• Gavi has faced criticism for its role in a 2016 polio vaccine switch that resulted in outbreaks in Africa, leading to over 3,300 children becoming paralyzed.

• The U. S. had previously pledged $2. 53 billion to Gavi from 2022 to 2030, with $880 million already allocated before the grant's termination.

• Gavi leadership, including its CEO Sania Nishtar and Gates Foundation CEO Mark Suzman, expressed fears that the funding cut would lead to millions of preventable child deaths.

• Internal reports have identified significant leadership failures and management errors within Gavi during the Africa polio crisis.

• Despite the controversies, Gavi has continued with mass vaccination campaigns without accountability for past errors.

• The funding cut has been framed as fiscally responsible and a vital challenge against the previously unchallenged influence of global health organizations.

The Trump administration's funding cut to Gavi represents a significant shift from reliance on major global health entities, emphasizing the need for accountability in their operations. This move is seen by many as a critical step toward reassessing the trust placed in these organizations while confronting the consequences of their past actions.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-03-31-trump-admin-cuts-funding-gavi-vaccine-alliance.html

Iran Rejects Trump Request for Direct Nuclear Negotiations

 Iran rejects Trump’s request for direct nuclear negotiations, state media reports

Scoop: White House to take charge of briefing-room seating chart
RFK Jr. body shames W.Va. governor
Trump economic team’s message: Don’t worry about prices, tax cuts are coming
AG files last-minute appeal to block Musk from gifting $2 million to voters in high-stakes WI court race
Pope Francis denounces war in Sudan, suggests living Lent ‘as a time of healing’
Screen time blamed for cross-cultural drop in birth rates
Canadians claim they are canceling trips to US for remainder of Trump term
Hegseth announces plan for US command upgrades in Japan to deter China
Trump Admin To Defend Catholic Charities In Key SCOTUS Case While Fighting Org In Lower Courts
ICE Arrests Another International Student As State Department Revokes 300 Foreign Student Visas
FDA’s Top Vaccine Official, Dr. Peter Marks, Resigns, Claims ‘Truth And Transparency Are Not Desired By The Secretary’
Utah Bans Pride Flags From Government Buildings, Schools In Pursuit Of ‘Political Neutrality’
Trump won’t rule out military force to take Greenland
Rosie the Riveters honored for service in WWII
FCC chair opens investigation into Disney and ABC over DEI practices

Dear US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention

 The letter by Tom Jefferson and Carl Heneghan calls out the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for exaggerating the risks of influenza. They argue that the CDC has manipulated data according to its interests, causing public confusion and misleading health policies.

• The authors accuse the CDC of inflating influenza threat estimates to suit their needs, resulting in serious public misrepresentation.

• Senior officials in the Biden administration reportedly acknowledged the inaccuracies in CDC data, yet the CDC refused to correct these errors.

• The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) revealed that the CDC's calculations on flu-related deaths were based on flawed models.

• The authors argue that the CDC’s decision-making has been influenced by political and financial motivations, including accepting funding from pharmaceutical companies.

• They express disdain for the CDC’s reluctance to acknowledge its mistakes and the harmful interventions they have promoted over the years.

• The authors are critical of the CDC’s lack of transparency and suggest that notable scientists within the organization are stifled to protect the status quo.

• The letter implies that the CDC is attempting to remove incriminating information but assures that the authors have preserved evidence of past communications and data.

In their closing sentiments, the authors express skepticism about the CDC's credibility not just concerning influenza but also regarding their COVID-19 reports. They suggest that ongoing scrutiny will reveal more about the CDC's underlying motives and its relationship with public health policy.

https://brownstone.org/articles/dear-us-centres-for-disease-control-and-prevention/

Raphael Warnock Lives Free in $1 Million Luxury Home—Purchased by His Church

 Senator Raphael Warnock from Georgia is living in a luxury home provided by Ebenezer Baptist Church, where he serves as a part-time pastor. This arrangement has raised ethical questions and criticism.

• Warnock resides in a five-bedroom house worth over a million dollars, purchased by his church for $989,000 in 2022.

• He lives there rent-free and does not pay property taxes, as church-owned properties are often tax-exempt.

• The church's decision to buy this luxury home has caused concern among some church members, including those affiliated with civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

• Dr. Albert Paul Brinson, a former associate of King, expressed that King would not have approved of the luxury accommodations.

• Warnock has not publicly discussed his housing arrangement but has encouraged church donations for a fundraising campaign.

• His financial disclosure indicates he earned $31,800 from the church and nearly $461,000 in book royalties in 2023; it is unclear if he donated to the church.

• Warnock's housing benefits have come under scrutiny due to allegations that the church also evicted low-income residents from another property during the pandemic.

• While ethics experts indicate that the arrangement may comply with Senate rules, concerns about the ethical implications remain.

Raphael Warnock's living situation has sparked debate regarding ethics and fairness, especially given the contrast between his luxurious accommodations and the struggles of low-income residents evicted by the church. 

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/raphael-warnock-lives-free-in-1-million-luxury-home-purchased-by-his-church/

Lawyers PAC funnels over $1 million to Illinois Democrats

A new report reveals that a trial lawyer's political action committee has spent over $1 million on Democratic candidates and committees since Election Day 2022. The report, titled “Follow the Money: How Illinois Trial Lawyers Fuel a Lawsuit-Friendly Legislature,” was created by Illinois Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse.

The Illinois Trial Lawyers Association Political Action Committee has contributed solely to Democrats in the General Assembly and statewide offices from 2022 to early 2025. Most of the contributions (81%) went to legislative candidates or PACs linked to the General Assembly and Senate. The top recipients were Speaker Chris Welch ($80,000) and Senate President Don Harmon ($75,000). Melin urges legislators to focus on their constituents rather than lobbyists. 

https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/article_f8d6254d-1d4a-40ba-a307-d42747ce823a.html 

Judges vs. America: How the Deep State Is Overruling Your Vote

 The article by Kevin McCullough discusses the ongoing conflict between elected officials and judges, highlighting a series of judicial actions that have halted executive orders aimed at implementing policies favored by voters.

1. Judicial Blockades:

Since President Trump took office in January 2025, judges have blocked 15 of his executive orders intended to fulfill the desires of voters. This includes orders related to deporting violent criminals, addressing bureaucratic corruption, and managing federal grants.

2. Nature of Resistance:

The article argues that this legal opposition is not a matter of following the law or upholding democracy but rather a coordinated effort by activist judges and legal organizations to obstruct the administration’s reforms. The author labels this phenomenon as “Lawfare,” where lawsuits are used to stifle reform.

3. Blocked Executive Orders:

Recent legal actions have hindered initiatives aimed at enhancing border security and enforcing immigration laws, which the author views as essential to the American public's interests.

4. Hypocrisy in Judicial Actions:

The article points out a discrepancy where President Biden faced little to no judicial resistance for his numerous executive orders, while Trump’s actions are met with swift legal challenges. This inconsistency is presented as evidence of political bias within the judiciary.

5. Political Implications:

The ongoing legal challenges raise questions about the functionality of the presidency. If judges continuously override elected officials, it could lead to a situation where only Democratic presidents can effectively govern, essentially rendering elections insignificant.

6. Call to Action for Republicans:

The article urges Republican lawmakers to counter this judicial overreach by utilizing their control in Congress. It advocates for accountability among judges and emphasizes the need to stand against any legal warfare directed at the administration.

7. Judiciary Reform:

The author insists on the necessity of appointing judges who uphold conservative values and warns against allowing ideological activists to infiltrate the courts. The judicial landscape needs careful consideration to prevent ongoing legal manipulations.

8. Awakening the Public:

The article stresses the importance of public awareness regarding this legal struggle, suggesting that if the judiciary continues to dismantle elected officials' agendas, democratic elections will lose their significance.

The central question posed is, "Who runs this countrythe voters or the judges? " The article warns that if current trends continue, American governance could shift toward a system where unelected judges hold the power to nullify the will of the people, undermining the democratic process and policy reform efforts led by elected officials. The situation demands immediate action and awareness from both legislators and the public to preserve the integrity of governance. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/judges-vs-america-how-the-deep-state-is-overruling-your-vote/

Here’s What’s At Stake In Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Election

 Wisconsin voters will cast their ballots on Tuesday for the State Supreme Court, marking the end of the most costly judicial race in state history. The outcome will impact important issues such as congressional maps, abortion, and voter laws.

• The election features conservative Brad Schimel against liberal Judge Susan Crawford. Schimel claims the court has become too liberal and positions himself as the defender against activist judges.

• Schimel argues that Crawford, who was supported by liberal donors, aims to reshape the court to advance a political agenda and potentially alter congressional seats from Republican to Democrat.

• Democrats believe that a Crawford victory would allow the Supreme Court to mandate redrawing Wisconsin’s congressional maps to favor their party.

• Significant campaign contributions have flooded the race, including support from major donors like George Soros and Elon Musk, who is backing Schimel and encouraging Wisconsin voters to do the same. He has been actively promoting his candidate and has also provided financial incentives for petition signers against activist judges.

• Crawford has criticized Musk's involvement, asserting that Schimel would merely support Trump’s agenda while defending her past judicial decisions, including those involving sex offender sentencing.

• Early voting has exceeded 500,000, and turnout on Election Day will be crucial for Schimel to secure a victory, especially since the previous election saw significant losses for Republican candidates.

• Donald Trump has endorsed Schimel, emphasizing the national significance of the election.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court election represents a pivotal moment with far-reaching implications, reflecting deeper national political battles. Voters are encouraged to participate and consider how their choice may shape the court's future and various societal issues. 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/heres-whats-at-stake-in-wisconsins-supreme-court-election

Tolerance Is Suicide

 The article argues that for Western civilization to endure, it must regain the Christian virtue of intolerance. The author, Ben Davis, contends that excessive pluralism and moral relativism undermine society by prioritizing false notions of tolerance over objective truth and morality.

1. Pluralism and Moral Relativism: These concepts are compared to a noose around Western civilization's neck, seen as a national sin of forgetting God. They lead to the denial of truth and the dilution of morality.

2. Misinterpretation of Tolerance: Tolerance is often mistaken for a Christian virtue but can facilitate acceptance of evil, which harms the moral foundation of a society.

3. Christian Love and Intolerance: True Christian love involves opposing what is evil rather than being indifferent. The author likens good parenting to how God expects us to care for others - by actively defending against threats.

4. Intolerance and Love: The article states that Christians are called to love God and their neighbors by resisting evil. True love requires acknowledging and opposing harmful actions and ideologies.

5. National Consequences: A collective tolerance of evil leads to national decline, and Christians must uphold Christian values to protect society.

6. Historical Context: The decline of Western society parallels its abandonment of Christian principles, pushing for intolerance toward systems that threaten foundational beliefs.

For Western civilization to survive, it must embrace intolerance for that which opposes good and promote a commitment to Christian values. Indifference toward evil is viewed as detrimental to both individuals and society, and Christians are encouraged to prioritize fostering and protecting what is morally right.

https://caldronpool.com/tolerance-is-suicide/

Grifterism: The Economic Engine of Democrats

 This article discusses the concept of "Grifterism," a term used to describe the Democratic Party's economic system. According to the author, Cynical Publius, Grifterism is structured to benefit a select few while hindering true economic freedom and growth.

1. Definition of Grifterism: Grifterism refers to an economic system characterized by the exploitation of various classes in society: Billionaires, Productives, Dependents, and Grifters themselves.

2. Classes in Grifterism:

• Billionaires: They create businesses and pay a large share of taxes, yet they are seen as complicit in the grifting system. Their wealth and influence help maintain regulatory frameworks that favor them, reducing competition and promoting monopolies.

• Productives: This class includes those who actively contribute to society (like doctors, farmers, small business owners). They face economic instability and rely heavily on their ability to navigate a regulatory landscape created by Grifters, putting them at risk of failure.

• Dependents: These are individuals who rely on government assistance. While some cannot support themselves, others exploit welfare systems. Dependents vote for Grifters, perpetuating the cycle of dependence.

• Grifters: Comprising government workers, lobbyists, and various professionals, this class benefits disproportionately from the system. They enjoy job security, better benefits, and a unique ability to create regulatory policies that serve their interests.

3. Interconnectedness of Classes: Each of these groups interacts symbiotically. Billionaires like those in the Grifter class benefit from regulations that hinder competition, which in turn keeps the other classes alike dependent or exploited. The entire system benefits the Grifters at the expense of the others.

4. The Role of Regulatory Capture: The article highlights how Billionaires influence regulations to create barriers for new competitors, which reinforces their economic power and the status quo of Grifterism.

5. Critique of Current Democratic Policies: The author suggests that Democratic economic policies are not entirely socialist, capitalistic, or fascist, but rather a unique blend that fosters Grifterism. This blend of policies is viewed as a means for maintaining power among elites while presenting inequitable solutions under the guise of equity.

Grifterism is portrayed as an economic cancer that must be addressed for the sake of true freedom and opportunity in America. The author calls on Americans to recognize and combat this system, suggesting that dismantling Grifterism is essential for future prosperity. The article advocates for understanding the dynamics of these classes and challenges readers to rethink their perspectives on economic policies linked to the Democratic Party. 

https://amgreatness.com/2025/03/31/grifterism-the-economic-engine-of-democrats/

Trump Has Begun to Clean House at the Department of Justice

 President Donald J. Trump is making significant changes to the Department of Justice (DOJ). He aims to remove individuals he considers problematic, a move projected as part of the upcoming 2024 campaign.

• Trump is reportedly firing unsavory elements within the DOJ, which he believes have been weaponized against him and others.

• Recent dismissals include two prosecutors in Los Angeles and Memphis, with at least 50 U. S. attorneys and their associates also being removed.

• These actions reflect a departure from previous practices, as it's uncommon to dismiss assistant U. S. attorneys in this manner.

• The fired prosecutors received only brief, one-sentence emails explaining their termination without further details.

• Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, confirmed that more than 50 U. S. attorneys and deputies were dismissed in recent weeks.

• Trump's administration’s goal is to focus on enforcing the law without engaging in politically charged investigations, differing from past approaches by the DOJ and the FBI.

• Trump has learned from his previous term, emphasizing the importance of quickly addressing problematic personnel within the government.

Trump's overhaul of the DOJ is a strategic move aimed at reshaping the department to prioritize law enforcement rather than political agendas, as he prepares for the upcoming election campaign.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/03/31/trump-has-begun-to-clean-house-at-the-department-of-justice-n2654722

Democrats Continue Bashing Elon Musk Despite Investing in Tesla

 The relationship between some Democrats and Tesla owner Elon Musk is complicated. While they often criticize him, some Democratic lawmakers have investments in Musk's company.

1. Democrats’ Criticism of Musk:

• Many Democrats, particularly after Musk allied with President Trump, have expressed strong dislike for him.

• Rep. Ilhan Omar criticized Musk, questioning his understanding of laws and rights.

• Rep. Greg Casar and Sen. Chuck Schumer voiced concerns over Musk's influence, particularly regarding the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

2. Secret Support for Tesla:

• Despite their public critiques, some Democrats own Tesla stock.

• Notable Democrats like Reps. Josh Gottheimer, Vicente Gonzalez, Gil Cisneros, and Ro Khanna have purchased Tesla shares since Trump took office.

• This investment contradicts their harsh statements about Musk, illustrating a disconnect between their words and actions.

3. Investments Amid Criticism:

• Rep. Cisneros publicly criticized Musk and the Trump administration, referring to their first month as “atrocious. ” Yet soon after, he bought Tesla stock.

• Similarly, Rep. Gottheimer warned about privacy risks associated with Musk’s access to sensitive data and also disclosed buying up to $45,000 in Tesla shares.

This situation reflects a common theme in politics where actions do not always align with statements. Some Democrats may publicly condemn Musk and his policies while they benefit personally from their investments in his company. This perceived hypocrisy questions the sincerity of their criticisms regarding Elon Musk and the DOGE initiative. 

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/jeff-charles/2025/03/30/democrats-continue-bashing-elon-musk-despite-investing-in-tesla-n2654717

Warren Buffett Gets It Wrong

 Warren Buffett, the leader of Berkshire Hathaway, recently shared insights in his annual report about capitalism and inflation. He emphasized the need for savings and proper capital deployment, while highlighting issues related to fiat money.

• Buffett mentions that poor government decisions can affect the value of paper money, indicating that inflation is linked to government actions.

• He describes capitalism as essential for economic progress, stemming from individuals saving and investing wisely rather than overspending.

• Buffett notes that despite issues in the American process, like scams and capital misallocation, the overall output from American savings has been historically significant.

• He expresses gratitude towards the government for allowing Berkshire's success and references Berkshire’s substantial tax contributions.

• An analysis reveals a contradiction in Buffett's views: he aligns capitalism with government success, overlooking the realities of sound money and the benefits seen during periods without heavy taxation or fiat currency.

• Criticism of taxes suggests they are a form of government theft, undermining personal motivation and economic productivity.

• Buffett’s acknowledgment of problems in capitalism points to the failures of fiat money and a welfare state that stifle personal property rights and investment.

• Ultimately, Buffett's criticism of the fiat system is questioned when he simultaneously supports funds that perpetuate it.

Warren Buffett's insights on capitalism and inflation reveal conflicting views. While he recognizes some problems with fiat money and misallocation, his responses suggest an oversight of the broader economic history and the real impact of government involvement in wealth creation. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/warren-buffett-gets-it-wrong

Yes, Let’s Give An America ‘Without A Meaningful Government’ A Try

 This article discusses the criticisms made by university professors regarding the Trump administration's approach to government. The professors argue that eliminating certain government functions could lead to a harmful lack of regulation. The editorial board counters their points by defending the idea of limited government and emphasizing the effectiveness of free markets.

1. Love for Government: The authors express concern about those who favor government intervention and believe in its inherent necessity. They argue this perspective is misguided and limits freedom.

2. Critique of Shapiro and Tomain: Professors Sidney Shapiro and Joseph P. Tomain argue that President Trump's agenda to reduce government could lead to unregulated markets. The editorial board believes they misunderstand the benefits of a free market.

3. Free Market Regulation: Political science professor James Rogers states that free markets effectively regulate themselves. The pursuit of self-interest by business owners, when operating in a competitive market, can actually benefit the public.

4. Federal Bureaucracy Defense: Shapiro and Tomain defend bureaucratic agencies and suggest that eliminating them is unprecedented. However, the editorial board argues that all government entities should be accountable and can be dismantled if necessary.

5. Effectiveness of Government Projects: While acknowledging significant government projects, the board poses questions about their efficiency. It criticizes previous projects, like the Hoover Dam, as potential misallocations of resources.

6. Waste and Inefficiency: The piece highlights the waste and inefficiencies tied to government projects, using examples like California's high-speed rail and comparing it unfavorably to private sector initiatives.

7. Regulation's Economic Impact: The proponents of regulation often ignore the negative effects it has on economic growth, as every regulatory position may correspond to job losses in the private sector.

8. Balancing Government and Markets: In their book, the professors suggest finding a balance between government and markets but do not explain how this balance should be determined or by whom.

9. Efficacy of Government: The board underscores that while government is necessary for maintaining order, it must be closely monitored to ensure it does not infringe on rights or liberties. This viewpoint is rooted in historical examples of government overreach.

The editorial board strongly advocates for a reduced role of government in economic life, believing that a free market can thrive without extensive government regulation. They propose that government should focus solely on enforcing laws and maintaining civil order, thus allowing individuals and businesses the freedom to prosper. Overall, the piece calls for a critical reassessment of the role government plays in citizens' lives, affirming that less government could lead to a more liberated society. 

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/03/27/yes-lets-give-an-america-without-a-meaningful-government-a-try/

Nearing the Final Battle Against the Deep State

Clarice Feldman discusses the ongoing legal battles between the federal administration and district court judges. She expresses confidence that the administration will regain control and restore a constitutional government despite various restraining orders.

• Various federal judges have issued orders that hinder the administration's efforts. However, Feldman believes these challenges will ultimately be overcome.

• There have been appeals to federal circuit courts, with some rulings supporting presidential powers over independent agencies. For example, the Fourth Circuit Court upheld the President's authority to dismiss members of certain agencies and stayed injunctions against collaborations with USAID.

• Recent cases include one in D. C. regarding a nationwide injunction related to the Alien Enemies Act and another in Massachusetts involving the restoration of $65 million in grants tied to DEI hiring policies.

• The Trump administration's focus is on countering these legal challenges to restore executive power and eliminate bureaucratic control that impedes government efficiency.

• Cases involving teacher hiring grants and the removal of foreign threats align with the broader strategy of reasserting executive authority under the Constitution.

• The Department of Justice has been proactive in seeking to vacate lower court decisions that it views as endangering essential executive functions.

• An initiative called DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) is being implemented to improve federal operations and manage resources better, targeting waste and inefficiencies in government systems.

• Recent actions include restructuring at the CIA and a focus on integrating DOGE to regain control of federal operations and limit excessive bureaucratic influence.

• The integration of DOGE would significantly alter the power dynamics within U. S. intelligence, potentially diminishing the influence of the deep state and restoring direct accountability to the elected government.

• Feldman highlights unsettling behavior towards Tesla owners and discusses the need for vigilance as political tensions escalate.

Feldman asserts that the efforts to integrate DOGE into intelligence could lead to a significant shift in power from unelected bureaucrats back to the elected officials, fundamentally challenging the existing deep state dynamics. She urges readers to stay aware and engaged in the political process.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/03/nearing_the_final_battle_against_the_deep_state.html 

You Won’t Believe What Insanity HHS Was Funding

 Recent actions by Trump's Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. , have led to significant cuts in federal research grants deemed wasteful and unnecessary. This comes as part of efforts to reform federal healthcare agencies.

• There are concerns over taxpayer money being used for certain federal studies, such as one on preventing pregnancy among "transgender boys" and another regarding HIV stigma in Thailand, which have been criticized as excessive.

• Reports indicate that billions of dollars in fraud and waste have been uncovered within federal agencies, prompting the HHS to initiate major funding cuts, particularly to woke projects.

• Specific grants that have been canceled include:

• Over $5 million for a study aimed at reducing HIV incidence among adolescent males.

• A Stanford study regarding sex hormone effects on transgender adolescents, which received over $3. 6 million.

• Additional cancellations include grants for various DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) and gender studies.

• The overall reduction in funding is substantial, with hundreds of NIH grants related to gender and DEI topics being terminated.

• Alongside these cuts, Kennedy has announced plans to reduce the number of HHS employees by around 20,000 and merge several departments into a new agency called the Administration for Healthy America (AHA).

The HHS is taking significant steps to eliminate what it considers unnecessary spending and inefficiencies, focusing on accountability in healthcare agencies. These changes are positioned as efforts to improve health outcomes for Americans, contrasting the previous administration's policies that have faced criticism. 

https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2025/03/29/you-wont-believe-what-insanity-hhs-was-funding-n4938389

GOP Bill Seeks to Cut Off NPR and PBS: “Taxpayers Shouldn’t Fund Propaganda”

 Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX) has introduced a bill to defund NPR and PBS, labeling them as "propaganda machines for the radical left. " This proposal was discussed during a congressional hearing where NPR's CEO, Katherine Maher, faced criticism from GOP lawmakers for perceived bias in the networks.

• Jackson's bill is called the "No Partisan Radio and Partisan Broadcasting Services Act. " It aims to eliminate federal funding for NPR and PBS.

• During a House Subcommittee hearing, Maher was challenged about NPR's liberal bias and its lack of coverage on the Hunter Biden laptop story during the 2020 election.

• Maher acknowledged NPR's failure to cover the story adequately, stating they recognized their mistake.

• The hearing also addressed NPR’s initial dismissal of the COVID-19 lab leak theory, which Maher noted they later covered due to new evidence.

• Former NPR senior editor Uri Berliner had previously accused the network of censoring dissenting viewpoints, adding to criticism against taxpayer support for NPR and PBS.

• President Trump expressed a desire to see both outlets shut down, calling them biased and wasteful of taxpayer money.

The bill drafted by Jackson reflects ongoing tensions over media bias in taxpayer-funded outlets. It highlights Republican concerns regarding the funding of NPR and PBS, suggesting the need for a broader conversation about public broadcasting and its perceived political leanings. 

https://www.dailyfetched.com/gop-bill-seeks-to-cut-off-npr-and-pbs-taxpayers-shouldnt-fund-propaganda/

First Oil And Gas Lease Sales On Public Lands Yield Nearly $40,000,000 In Early Win For Trump Administration

 The Department of the Interior (DOI) reported over $39 million in revenue from oil and gas lease sales on public lands in early 2025. This reflects the government's commitment to responsible energy development and job growth while reducing foreign resource reliance. DOI Secretary Doug Burgum highlighted the importance of these sales for national security and economic strength, following the policies of the Trump administration.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) leased 34 parcels covering 25,038 acres and will distribute lease revenues between states and the federal government. States involved include North Dakota, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, and Wyoming. Additionally, the BLM plans to conduct 15 more lease sales in 2025. Royalty from production stands at 16. 67%, with leases lasting 10 years if production continues.

https://dailycaller.com/2025/03/29/department-of-the-interior-oil-and-gas-lease-sales-nearly-40000000-in-revenue/ 

Alaska GOP Clears First Hurdle in New Attempt to Repeal Controversial Voting Scheme

 Efforts to repeal ranked-choice voting (RCV) in Alaska are underway once again, having made progress in gathering signatures for a petition. This initiative follows a previous attempt in 2024 that narrowly failed.

• The current repeal campaign, led by the group REPEAL NOW, started on Saturday at the Governor’s Prayer Breakfast in Anchorage.

• The new team includes Bernadette Wilson, Bethany Marcum, and Judy Eledge, who aim to educate voters about the complexities of the RCV system.

• The last repeal attempt was significantly outspent by opponents using Outside funding but came very close to succeeding.

• In 2022, some voters expressed confusion over how to rank their choices, potentially impacting election outcomes.

• The campaign now plans to raise funds to support their educational efforts and make a case against RCV, which is backed by Democrats and Senator Lisa Murkowski.

• The success of this repeal effort in Alaska could influence similar movements elsewhere as it is seen as a crucial battleground against ranked-choice voting.

This repeal initiative aims to dismantle the ranked-choice voting law passed in 2020, with hopes of gaining enough support to succeed in 2026.

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2025/03/30/alaska-gop-clears-first-hurdle-in-new-attempt-to-repeal-controversial-voting-scheme-n2187302

Nearly 5,000 Suspect Voter Registrations Discovered Ahead of Critical WI Supreme Court Election

 A grassroots group found almost 5,000 questionable voter registrations in Milwaukee just days before an important election in Wisconsin. Despite the findings, the local election commission opted not to investigate the discrepancies.

• Fair Elections Wisconsin (FEW) identified 4,878 potentially illegal voter registrations that had been used in the previous election.

• The Milwaukee Election Commission dismissed a formal challenge by FEW, ignoring evidence of improper registrations.

• Key issues included:

• 281 registrants had moved out of the county.

• 377 registrants had moved out of state before the registration deadline.

• 2,926 addresses lacked proper apartment or unit numbers.

• 501 addresses were registered as P. O. boxes, which is illegal.

• 24 registrations used commercial addresses like UPS and FedEx.

• 11 used U. S. Post Office addresses, also ineligible.

• FEW requested action, including prosecution for unlawful registrations and marking questionable ones as "Inactive," but the commission refused to investigate.

• The election on April 1 includes a vote on enshrining photo ID requirements in the state constitution and a closely watched race for the state Supreme Court.

With nearly 5,000 suspect registrations still on the rolls, the refusal of Milwaukee officials to act raises significant concerns about election integrity as Wisconsin voters prepare to make critical decisions at the polls. 

https://www.beckerbrief.com/p/nearly-5000-suspect-voter-registrations

Liberal Law Professor Jonathan Turley on Judges Interfering in Trump’s Agenda: ‘They Have Intruded Into Areas of Presidential Authority’

Jonathan Turley, a law professor, speaks out about judges obstructing President Trump's plans. He argues that these actions are a form of judicial interference, undermining the authority of the elected President.

1. Judicial Interference: Turley emphasizes that a few judges are attempting to halt Trump's agenda, which he believes is a clear instance of overreach.

2. Public Election: He asserts that America chose Trump, not a group of judges, highlighting the need for the judiciary to respect the will of the voters.

3. Discussion on Judicial Powers: In a segment on FOX News, Turley discusses concerns about judges issuing national injunctions against executive actions. He compares the situation to passengers pulling the emergency brake in a car, making it difficult to drive.

4. Supreme Court Opinions: Turley mentions that even liberal justices, like Kagan, have criticized the trend of trial judges issuing national injunctions, describing it as "madness. "

5. Legislation Being Considered: Congress is considering legislation to limit the power of lower court judges regarding the issuance of national injunctions.

6. Predictions of Outcomes: Turley believes the Trump administration will prevail in most legal challenges against these judicial actions, citing that federal judges have overstepped their bounds and invaded presidential authority.

Turley argues that the public is frustrated with judicial interference in presidential authority and calls for judges to step back, allowing Trump to enact the policies for which he was elected. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/liberal-law-professor-jonathan-turley-judges-interfering-trumps/

Scott Jennings To CNN Panel: Democrats Morphed Into Angry Mob Cheering Violence & Chaos

Scott Jennings, a GOP analyst, commented on remarks made by Democratic Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett regarding Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who is wheelchair-bound. Jennings criticized the Democratic party's current direction and its connection with their far-left elements.

• Jennings expressed gratitude for Crockett's visibility, suggesting her radical statements further alienate the party from mainstream America.

• He highlighted that leftist audiences appear to support extreme actions, including vandalism against Tesla vehicles and aggression towards individuals with disabilities.

• Jennings accused the far-left of embracing a culture of hate and violence, noticing a significant decline in the approval ratings for Democrats27% for NBC and 29% for CNN.

• Elon Musk also highlighted concerns over violence against peaceful businesses, particularly targeting Tesla.

• The Democratic party's use of aggressive tactics, such as vandalism, is viewed as an attempt to regain political ground but seems oblivious to changing public sentiment.

The ongoing dialogue indicates a widening gap between the far-left and mainstream views within the Democratic party, with rising concerns about the implications of adopting radical tactics for political gain.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/scott-jennings-cnn-panel-democrats-morphed-angry-mob-cheering-violence-chaos 

Federal Judge Halts Shutdown of Voice of America

 A federal judge has issued a temporary order stopping the Trump administration from shutting down the Voice of America (VOA), a government-funded news service. This action follows a lawsuit filed by VOA employees against the U. S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM).

• Judge J. Paul Oetken of the Southern District of New York ruled in favor of VOA employees, preventing USAGM from closing the network and its radio programs.

• Employees had been placed on paid leave as part of a shutdown process. The lawsuit claimed USAGM violated press freedom and the separation of powers by halting VOA’s operations.

• The judge noted that USAGM's actions seemed unconstitutional and that the acting Director lacked authority to cut funding or terminate staff.

• The shutdown was controversial, with critics including President Donald Trump, who accused VOA of bias and stated it misuses taxpayer money.

• In earlier conflicts, the government criticized VOA for allegedly promoting foreign propaganda.

• Since the lawsuit, the Trump administration has resumed funding for VOA and similar networks.

The judge's decision provides a temporary reprieve for VOA employees while the court reviews the legality of the shutdown. The ongoing debate over the agency's role continues amid critiques from political figures.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/federal-judge-halts-shutdown-of-voice-of-america-5833487?utm_source=Goodevening&src_src=Goodevening&utm_campaign=gv-2025-03-29&src_cmp=gv-2025-03-29&utm_medium=email&est=IOZRFVHYYUiSIbyGhGJtD96oKDJJyzk%2FyeB%2BGhhDAocNRW2%2BecOfPi3j9%2BCJark%3D

Interest costs on U.S. debt to exceed economic growth by 2045, increasing risk of fiscal crisis

The U. S. is projected to face a critical financial milestone by 2045 where the average interest rate on national debt will surpass the economic growth rate. This situation could lead to a debt spiral, as warned by analysts from a budget watchdog group.

• Interest costs are estimated to reach a record 3. 2 percent of GDP this year, exceeding expenses for defense and Medicare. This is predicted to rise to 5. 4 percent by 2055.

• If the average interest rate becomes higher than the economic growth rate by 2045, this could initiate a debt spiral, creating severe economic issues.

• Rising debt and deficits may lead to several negative outcomes, including slowed income growth, increased interest rates for the national debt, greater geopolitical risks, and a heavier burden on future generations.

• There is a concerning rise in the national debt, which could grow from 100 percent of GDP in FY 2025 to 156 percent by 2055.

• Annual budget deficits are expected to increase from 6. 2 percent of GDP in 2025 to 7. 3 percent by 2055, marking the highest rates seen outside of major crises.

• The Social Security fund is at risk of insolvency, projected to run out of reserves by 2033, leading to significant cuts in benefits.

• Policymakers need to address the issues of debt and deficit urgently, with recommendations against extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act without securing adequate offsets.

• Future tax revenues are likely to fall short, which will not bridge the increasing deficit gap since spending is expected to outpace tax collection.

• The CBO forecasts slow economic growth over the next decade, highlighting the necessity for responsible tax-related policy decisions to stimulate growth without worsening national debt.

The CBO's recent report serves as a warning sign for U. S. leaders to control spending to prevent the federal debt from reaching unsustainable levels. Urgent action is required as the nation faces financial challenges that could have significant implications for its fiscal health and economic stability in the coming decades. 

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/us-debt-track-exceed-economic-growth-2045-cbo

The case for locking up the Deep State’s biggest hatchet man…

The content outlines the controversial actions of Norm Eisen, highlighting his involvement in political maneuvers aimed at undermining former President Donald Trump. Eisen's background, techniques, and connections are presented to portray him as a central figure in promoting strategies akin to color revolutions to remove Trump from power.

• Background of Norm Eisen: A Harvard Law graduate, Eisen gained prominence through his connections with Barack Obama and later as a significant player in legal actions against Trump. He has been associated with liberal organizations and has actively participated in political activities against the Trump administration.

• Legal Attack Strategies: Eisen is depicted as a mastermind behind various legal challenges and impeachment processes against Trump, including drafting articles of impeachment before the Ukraine phone call incident. His legal tactics are linked to broader efforts to delegitimize Trump and prevent his political resurgence.

• Color Revolution Concepts: The piece explains the concept of a "Color Revolution," which refers to non-violent resistance tactics used to discredit foreign governments. Eisen is suggested to have applied these tactics within the U. S. against Trump, manipulating legal frameworks and public sentiment.

• Colorado Supreme Court Case: Recent events involving the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to exclude Trump from the ballot are discussed. The argument was based on Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was criticized for its vagueness and lack of relevance to the presidency.

• Connections with Advocacy Groups: Eisen co-founded Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), which played a role in filing lawsuits against the Trump administration. His connection to this organization emphasizes his strategic coordination against Trump.

• Claims of Treason: The document concludes by asserting that Eisen’s actions may constitute treason or sedition. The portrayal suggests that his legal maneuvers and alliances were designed to not only undermine Trump but also undermine democratic processes.

The narrative paints a picture of Norm Eisen as a pivotal figure in a political campaign against Donald Trump, employing controversial strategies reminiscent of international regime change efforts. The text raises questions about the legitimacy of such actions and calls for accountability, suggesting that Eisen's efforts reflect broader issues within American political dynamics. 

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-03-30-deep-states-biggest-hatchet-man-norm-eisen.html

Rhetoric, Lies, and the Media: A Quintilian Perspective on Modern Journalism

The article discusses how modern media distorts truth, especially regarding public figures like Donald Trump. The author, Roger Kimball, compares today's journalism to ancient rhetorical practices described by Quintilian, suggesting a manipulation of facts and bias.

1. Media Distortion: The media, particularly outlets like The New York Times, misrepresents facts about individuals (e. g. , Elon Musk) to weave a narrative that aligns with their biases. The article emphasizes the flawed portrayal of Musk’s South African background.

2. Critique of CNN's Stephen Collinson: Kimball criticizes Collinson’s view of Trump as a dictator attacking elites. He argues that Trump's actions are legitimate and supported by his electoral mandate for changes such as immigration reform and fiscal responsibility.

3. Misinterpretation of Intent: The author counters Collinson's assertions that Trump seeks retribution against political enemies. Kimball claims Trump intends to address abuses by bureaucratic systems rather than enacting revenge.

4. Distorted Terminology: The term "elite" is used incorrectly to label Trump’s opponents. Kimball argues that being "elite" refers to credentialed status rather than actual merit or achievement.

5. Anti-Semitism and Campus Reform: Kimball highlights Collinson's failure to acknowledge anti-Semitism in Trump’s education policies, arguing that the measures taken were aimed at promoting accountability and traditional values in education.

6. Overall Message: Kimball portrays Collinson’s rhetoric as deceptive and steeped in anti-Trump sentiment. He suggests that the media constructs narratives that vilify Trump while ignoring legitimate concerns about responsibility and governance.

The article presents a scathing critique of modern journalism, particularly its treatment of Donald Trump and others. It emphasizes the need for critical reading to discern truth from politicized messaging, arguing that the current media landscape distorts reality and undermines honest discourse. 

https://amgreatness.com/2025/03/30/rhetoric-lies-and-the-media-a-quintilian-perspective-on-modern-journalism/

Recycling Power: Rethinking Nuclear Waste

This article discusses the ongoing problem of used nuclear fuel (UNF) in the United States, with a focus on the need for a new approach, specifically recycling, to manage this waste effectively.

• Current Situation: Nuclear energy accounts for nearly 20% of U. S. electricity. Over 90,000 metric tons of used nuclear fuel are stored across 39 states, including 4,000 metric tons in Texas. Although the government has collected over $20 billion for the disposal of UNF, it has not removed any significant amount from reactor sites.

• Challenges: The lack of significant removal of UNF results in financial loss and continued storage issues at reactor sites. There have been attempts to create interim storage facilities in Texas and New Mexico, yet these proposals face strong opposition, leading to legal disputes currently being reviewed by the Supreme Court.

• Proposed Solution: The article argues for rethinking the management of UNF through recycling instead of long-term storage. Recycling can provide a new energy source, utilizing technology already in use in countries like France and Japan. Establishing a recycling policy would:

1. Remove UNF from reactor sites.

2. Restart a financial program for nuclear utilities that could generate $2 billion annually for the Treasury.

3. Mitigate concerns about storing nuclear waste near populated areas.

4. Replace the current need for nuclear fuel sourced from Russia.

• Benefits of Recycling:

• Recycling would maximize the use of UNF, creating mixed oxide fuel (MOX) for reactors.

• It addresses the issue of UNF disposal and contributes to energy needs, generating jobs and supporting energy demand.

Renewing nuclear waste management by adopting a recycling policy is presented as a feasible solution to the United States' nuclear energy challenges. This approach could enhance energy reliability while addressing environmental and financial concerns linked to UNF storage.

Rick Perry, the author, emphasizes that effective solutions already exist and that the U. S. should catch up with other countries in recycling nuclear fuel. 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/03/29/recycling-power-rethinking-nuclear-waste/

The Swirling Vortex of Weaponised Lawfare

The article discusses the intertwining issues of lawfare, the judiciary’s failures, and the political landscape in the context of the United States, particularly regarding the Trump administration and broader judicial actions.

1. Judicial Failures During Covid: The courts did not protect rights and liberties during the Covid years, leading to a perception of judicial failure.

2. Threats to Democracy: Technocratic elites are viewed as a greater threat to democracy than populist movements, with judges seen as the last bastion defending gains made by social justice movements.

3. Judicial Fallibility: Judges are not infallible. Historical cases in Australia illustrate that wrongful convictions can and do occur, and personal biases can influence judicial outcomes.

4. Corruption and Oversight: There are mechanisms for addressing judicial incompetence, but incidents of corruption, such as a recent scandal involving a judge in India, highlight weaknesses in oversight.

5. Judicial Overreach: Questions are raised about judges’ self-discipline and whether they may overstep their boundaries, especially when balancing the urgency of executive actions.

6. The Political Landscape: A significant ideological disconnect exists between judges and public sentiment, as seen in the political donations of American law professors and judges’ decisions aligned with specific political ideologies.

7. National Injunctions: The article notes how district court judges can issue national injunctions, indicating potential judicial overreach and suggesting that these decisions can be influenced by political biases.

8. Calls for Reform: Proposed reforms include forming a three-judge panel from different circuits to handle presidential order challenges, which may help restore balance among branches of government.

9. Global Context: Similar issues are noted in other democracies, such as Australia and Canada, where courts are viewed as interfering with elected officials' powers and exacerbating political crises.

10. Elite Contempt for the People: There is a growing sense of contempt among elites, including judges, towards the general public and their political choices, contrasting with the direct engagement seen with populist leaders.

The article argues that there is a troubling trend in how judicial systems, influenced by ideological biases and elite perspectives, are affecting democratic governance. It calls for reforms to ensure accountability and align the judiciary more closely with the people’s sentiments, suggesting that unchecked judicial power may risk fundamental democratic principles. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-swirling-vortex-of-weaponised-lawfare/

National Security and the Global Landscape

The article discusses the importance of a strong security strategy for conservative governance. It emphasizes that security is essential for freedom, democratic values, and community safety.

1. Current Security Issues: There is a growing sense of insecurity, and recent policies have affected law enforcement negatively. The narrative of defunding the police has exacerbated crime rates and undermined public safety.

2. Comparative Threats: The author views Islamic radicalism as a significant threat to Western security, even more so than the dictatorship of Communist China.

3. Crime Dynamics: The rise in crime is attributed to a mix of lost societal values, poverty, and ineffective policies that make crime appealing over honest work. The need for law and order is stressed and is considered essential for community safety.

4. Immigration Concerns: Legal immigration is viewed positively as a contributor to national greatness, while illegal immigration is seen as a form of state-sponsored crime. A long-term strategy regarding immigration is needed, factoring in cultural compatibility with Western society.

5. Global ALIGNMENTS: The potential threats from Russia, China, Iran, and Latin America are acknowledged. Strengthening alliances is encouraged to maintain U. S. sovereignty and security without resorting to overextension in global policing roles.

6. Future Challenges: The article warns of future conflicts resembling jihad rather than traditional warfare, emphasizing the need for preparedness against emerging threats, including those posed by advancements in technology and artificial intelligence.

7. Policy Recommendations: A conservative government must anticipate approaching threats, especially those related to AI crime. Training specialized units to address AI-related criminal activities is suggested as a forward-looking measure.

The article argues that a rigorous approach to law enforcement and security is essential for preserving freedom and democratic values. Emphasizing stronger capabilities within policing and addressing the complex issues surrounding immigration and global alliances are critical for a safe and secure future. The rise of AI presents new challenges that must be confronted as we evolve our security strategies. 

https://spectator.org/the-future-left-the-group-iv-national-security/

A curiosity about the DC District Court’s judges

An article by John M. Contino discusses the U. S. District Court of the District of Columbia, focusing on the judges who were appointed, particularly those born outside the United States. The piece highlights their lack of prior experience as judges and raises questions about their ideological motivations.

• Out of fifteen judges on the D. C. District Court, five are foreign-born and have no judicial experience before their appointments.

• Chief Judge James Boasberg is mentioned alongside his peers.

• The appointment of these judges can be traced back to Barack Obama, who appointed Judge Tanya Sue Chutkan, born in Jamaica, and Judge Amit P. Mehta, born in India, both of whom had no prior judicial experience.

• Joe Biden continued this pattern by appointing Judge Ana Cecilia Reyes from Uruguay and Judge Amir Hatem Mahdy Ali from Canada, neither of whom were judges before their nominations.

• Judge Sparkle Sooknanan, born in Trinidad and Tobago and confirmed in early 2025, is also part of this trend.

• Concerns are raised that foreign-born judges might not fully appreciate American values compared to native-born judges.

• The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of Chief Justice Roberts' actions for the future of the constitutional republic.

The article argues that the selection of these foreign-born judges reflects ideological motivations rather than a focus on experience or neutrality. It raises broader questions about the implications of such appointments for the U. S. legal system. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/03/a_curiosity_about_the_dc_district_court_s_judges.html

Nearing the Final Battle Against the Deep State

Clarice Feldman discusses ongoing legal battles between the administration and various federal judges, emphasizing the need for the executive branch to reclaim control from what she describes as the "deep state" and its judicial allies. She expresses confidence that the current administration will restore a constitutional republican government.

1. Legal Challenges:

• Multiple district court judges have issued restraining orders against the administration.

• Appeals have been made to the federal circuit courts, with notable rulings favoring the President’s powers, including dismissals in independent agencies.

2. Department of Justice (DOJ) Actions:

• The DOJ has filed motions with the Supreme Court to vacate orders from district judges, which include:

• A reinstatement of 16,000 terminated employees from the NLRB and Merit Systems Protection Board.

• Restoration of $65 million in grants that contained diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) hiring conditions that the administration opposes.

3. Authority Over National Security:

• The ongoing case about removing individuals identified as national security threats is under scrutiny, with discussions about the Executive Branch's right to prioritize national safety over individual rights of these alleged enemies.

4. Dissolution of Administrative Complexities:

• The discussion brings attention to the creation of DOGE, aimed at reducing federal waste and improving financial transparency within the government.

• The initiative has implications for the CIA and may alter how intelligence operations are conducted.

5. Impact of DOGE:

• If successful, DOGE could centralize control and eliminate the influence of unelected bureaucrats, potentially restructuring power dynamics within the government.

6. Public Concerns:

• Feldman notes an increase in radical behavior among some individuals, particularly targeting Tesla and its owners, urging vigilance among citizens as political tensions rise.

Feldman remains optimistic about the administration's efforts to overhaul the current bureaucratic system and its legal frameworks. She encourages proactive citizenship, especially in voting, to support the changes needed for restoring governance. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/03/nearing_the_final_battle_against_the_deep_state.html

Planned Parenthood Put on Notice: Trump Confirms Possible Criminal Investigation Into Baby Body Parts Scandal

 On March 25, President Trump addressed a significant issue regarding Planned Parenthood and the potential for a criminal investigation into allegations of illegal activities related to baby organ harvesting.

• President Trump was questioned about investigating Planned Parenthood's practices if the organization were defunded. He confirmed, "We’ll look into it, we’re going to look into everything. "

• In 2015, undercover videos released by the Center for Medical Progress suggested that Planned Parenthood was involved in illegal profit-making from the trafficking of tissue and organs from aborted babies.

• Despite the evidence and two Congressional investigations referring the matter to the U. S. Department of Justice, Planned Parenthood did not face federal charges.

• Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue, criticized Planned Parenthood for avoiding prosecution and stated that their political influence is declining as their clinics struggle and employee concerns rise about work conditions and donation use.

• On the same day as Trump's statement, reports indicated a potential $20 million funding freeze for Planned Parenthood due to a review by Health and Human Services concerning the organization's use of funds.

• Newman called for investigations and prosecutions regarding Planned Parenthood's practices, describing the organization as a "criminal organization masquerading as healthcare. "

The announcement of a possible investigation into Planned Parenthood marks a significant development in the ongoing scrutiny of the organization. As discussions on funding and accountability arise, many advocate for thorough inquiries into the allegations against Planned Parenthood.

https://www.operationrescue.org/planned-parenthood-put-on-notice-trump-confirms-possible-criminal-investigation-into-baby-body-parts-scandal/

Nearly Every Federal Judge Obstructing Trump Has a Spouse or Child Drawing a Paycheck From a Democrat-Aligned NGO

Recent events highlight ongoing tensions within the U. S. judicial and political landscape, particularly regarding immigration laws, judicial conflicts of interest, and political activism among judges and their families.

1. Judicial Conflicts of Interest:

• Some judges are accused of failing to recuse themselves from cases due to potential conflicts related to family affiliations with organizations that oppose certain government actions.

• Elon Musk criticized these judges, suggesting they prioritize personal interests and familial connections over impartiality.

2. Recent Rulings on Deportation:

• Judge James Boasberg extended a block on President Trump's deportation flights for violent gang members, raising concerns about his family's financial ties to NGOs opposing such deportations.

• Boasberg’s daughter works for a nonprofit that is seen as pro-immigrant, which has led to accusations of bias in his judicial decisions.

3. Nonprofit's Financial Ties:

• The nonprofit group associated with Boasberg's daughter received substantial government funding and actively opposes certain legislative measures aimed at detaining illegal immigrants involved in crimes.

• This financial relationship has sparked discussions about the influence of such organizations on legal proceedings.

4. Political Reactions:

• There has been a call from some political commentators for the Supreme Court to intervene in immigration policy matters.

• There are demands for more accountability and transparency within the judicial system, particularly regarding judges' affiliations with nonprofit organizations.

5. Public Sentiment:

• The public is divided on these issues, with some expressing outrage over perceived judicial biases and others advocating for the rights and protections of immigrants.

The integration of personal and professional affiliations within the judicial system prompts a reevaluation of ethical standards for judges, especially in politically charged cases. The ongoing debates reflect broader societal divisions on immigration policy and judicial integrity. 

https://gellerreport.com/2025/03/federal-judge-obstructing-trump-democrat-ngo.html/

US Just Secured the 2nd Release of an American Citizen From the Taliban This Month

Recently, two Americans were released from Taliban captivity in Afghanistan. The stories of their gratitude reflect significant changes in U. S. foreign policy under President Trump.

• One week ago, American George Glezmann was freed after two years in Taliban imprisonment, expressing immense gratitude upon his release.

• Zalmay Khalilzad, a former U. S. ambassador, announced the release of another American, Faye Hall, on social media, sharing a photo of her return journey.

• Hall had been detained since February for using a drone without permission and was released through a deal facilitated by Qatari negotiators.

• After her release, Hall shared an emotional thank you video to President Trump, which he shared on his social media account.

• Hall's detention was brief compared to other American hostages during prior administrations, indicating a shift in the U. S. government's handling of hostage situations.

Faye Hall's and George Glezmann’s releases illustrate a new approach to foreign policy under President Trump, as the country moves away from being the subject of international ridicule and towards a more assertive stance on hostage recovery. This story continues to develop, and updates will be provided as needed. 

https://redstate.com/beccalower/2025/03/29/the-us-just-secured-the-2nd-release-of-an-american-citizen-from-the-taliban-this-month-n2187273

Texas Under Siege: The Stealth Islamic Takeover We Can’t Ignore

The article warns about perceived Islamic influence in Texas, focusing on the East Plano Islamic Center (EPIC) and its proposed project called "EPIC City. " This investment is being investigated for potential fraud and violations of state law, raising alarms among critics who believe it represents a broader threat to Texas values.

• Investigations and Concerns: Governor Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton are investigating EPIC due to allegations of misleading investors regarding the EPIC City, a large development which critics claim promotes Sharia law over American values. Abbott insisted that all entities in Texas must adhere to state law, rejecting any notion of “Sharia cities. ”

• Public Response and Criticism: Critics, including activists from the RAIR Foundation, express concern that the project reflects a calculated effort to establish a community that operates on Islamic principles rather than American laws. They refer to it as an enclosed community that could undermine the Constitution.

• Project Overview and Implications: The EPIC City proposal includes a mosque, Islamic school, and residential areas; opponents argue it fosters a separation from Texas' legal and cultural framework. In addition to the investment investigation, EPIC has faced other regulatory issues, such as a cease-and-desist order regarding unlicensed funeral services.

• Pattern of Growth: The narrative suggests that EPIC City represents a part of a national trend, which they characterize as a deliberate attempt to spread Islamic ideology into non-Muslim areas, supported by a growing Muslim population within Texas.

• Call to Action: The article urges Texans to remain vigilant against what is framed as an invasion of Islamic interests that could compromise their freedoms. It argues that silence from the Muslim community equates to complicity, calling for active denouncement of these developments.

The piece paints a dire picture of what it claims to be an ongoing effort to impose Islamic governance in Texas through developments like EPIC City. It calls on Texas leaders and residents to take action against these initiatives to preserve their state’s cultural identity and legal framework. The tone is one of urgency, encouraging proactive measures to confront this perceived threat before it becomes an irreversible change in Texas society. 

https://gellerreport.com/2025/03/texas-sharia-city.html/

DOGE Discovers the Biden-Mayorkas Illegal Migration Funding Machine

The article discusses findings by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) regarding the Biden administration's financial support for illegal immigration. It highlights how taxpayer money has been used to assist illegal aliens entering the U. S. and the implications of such actions.

1. Illegal Immigration Funding:

• The Biden administration granted $31 billion to the Department of Health and Human Services for housing and services for illegal aliens over four years.

• FEMA received significant funding, channeling billions to states and local governments to support illegal migrants.

2. FEMA's Role:

• FEMA's Shelter and Services Program was allocated $2. 2 billion from FY2021 to FY2024 to aid noncitizens released from custody.

• In 2024, FEMA earmarked $640. 9 million for states and localities to assist illegal aliens, especially in Democrat-run areas.

3. Controversial Use of Funds:

• Some funds from FEMA went to convert luxurious hotels into shelters for illegal aliens, revealing a pattern of using taxpayer dollars to support unauthorized immigration.

• The Emergency Food and Shelter Program, originally intended for homeless veterans, was also repurposed to assist illegal immigrants.

4. Nonprofit Involvement:

• Various NGOs received large federal grants to facilitate the resettlement of illegal aliens, drastically increasing their caseloads.

• Significant amounts of federal funds were directed to organizations like Jewish Family Services and Catholic Charities for migration-related tasks.

5. Public Reaction:

• Citizens are expressing outrage about the use of taxpayer dollars to support illegal immigration, leading to calls for accountability and legal action against involved officials.

• Many commenters blame the Biden administration for creating a perceived crisis at the border and facilitating mass unauthorized entry into the U. S.

6. Call for Legislative Changes:

• There are appeals for new laws to prevent any government funding from being used to assist noncitizens.

• Critics argue for the need to investigate the financial connections between NGOs and political donations.

The article sheds light on the significant financial resources allocated by the Biden administration to support illegal immigration, raising concerns among taxpayers about misuse of funds and government accountability. The reaction from the public indicates a growing discontent with this approach, demanding accountability for those involved in the alleged funding of unauthorized immigration efforts.

https://amac.us/newsline/society/doge-discovers-the-biden-mayorkas-illegal-migration-funding-machine/?utm_objective=website_traffic&utm_source=email&utm_campaign=amac&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_content=newsletter_032925&dderh=30f152fff657893d0f060684165af137