Since
social engineering is not a function assigned by the Constitution to
the government. Who gave government progressive elitists this
responsibility? No one. They took it upon themselves to assume that
responsibility thinking that legislating human behavior was the tool
they would use to forge a society "they" felt appropriate, for the good
of the less informed and sophisticated folk across the land. Whether
intentional or not the whole scheme emerged during the Wilson
administration with the establishment of the Federal Reserve and launch
of the federal income tax program. In tandem those two events enabled
the government for the first time to have access to an endless supply of
money courtesy of taxpayers. The founders considered but rejected the
idea of a central bank (federal reserve) and direct taxation of citizens
owing to their view that the federal government's duties should be few
and limited. And, they felt individuals and families should be self
sufficient with those requiring charity provided for by local
communities and churches. What happened?
Government spending on social
programs started slowly but took off with the Roosevelt administration's
New Deal. Principle among the programs started were
various programs which until then had been the province of communities,
charitable and religious organizations. New Deal advocates thought that
a centralized system managed out of Washington DC was a good idea
because they could use funds confiscated from taxpayers and distributed
as the Washington elite saw fit. As employed in the Roosevelt
administration the programs turned into political tools used to
manipulate the voting process. Through these programs every president
and congress since has in one way or another contributed to ever
expanding intrusion of federal government involvement in the lives of
individuals, families and businesses across the country.
The pace, however, accelerated
with President Johnson's Great Society which expanded Social
Security beyond that launched by the New Deal and added both the
Medicare and Medicaid (among others) programs to the growing list of
government sanctioned social programs. It is safe to say that every
president and complicit congress since Johnson has broadened social
support systems some to limited degrees and others more expansively.
Those programs have had at least two major impacts. First, dramatic
increases in program costs and devastating impacts on our nation's
social structures (see link 1). Secondly, Social Security, Medicare and
Medicaid alone now consume 55% of the federal budget and that
percentage does not include the cost of food stamps, housing subsidies
and a host of other programs.
The costs of all of these
programs is growing at an alarming rate while the economy, number of
taxpayers and tax collections are in a steady decline. (see link 2) As
documented in the 2012 edition of the Index of Dependence on Government, "The
federal government spent more taxpayer dollars than ever before in 2011
to subsidize Americans. The average individual who relies on Washington
could receive benefits valued at $32,748, more than the nation’s
average disposable personal income ($32,446)." It also noted that 49.5%
of the American population pays no federal income taxes. (see link 3)
Now add to the list of federal government social engineering projects the current administration's latest proposal. They want to establish racial standards for neighborhoods. (see link 4) Even after reading the item it is hard to imagine the full extent of impacts to the nation's social and economic structure and infringement of individual rights that are sure to result if implemented. I checked my copy of the Constitution and could not find anything that even had the word "neighborhood" in it nor could I find anything that one could use to construe such a meaning. And I absolutely know no words can be found that assign the federal government responsibility for setting racial standards for the nation's neighborhoods.
When will we learn that
government does not successfully implement social programs nor does it
have any business doing so. As noted in the second link the unintended
consequences of such programs often produce enormously
expensive bureaucratic nightmares and end up harming the very people
they were intended to help. I cannot imagine who will benefit from this
administration's latest scheme. Please folks, we need to get the
progressives in the federal government out of our lives and back to
performings their rightful Constitutional duties, which are few and
limited and do not even in the remotest sense include social
engineering.
1. http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/hhs/welfare-spending
2. http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=1258
3. http://blog.heritage.org/2012/02/08/dependence-on-government-at-all-time-high/
4. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/23/team-obama-steps-up-racial-standards-for-neighborhoods/?cmpid=NL_FNTopHeadlines
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment