Sam Ro
It's still an election year and the presidential campaign rages on.
Everyone is making a lot of noise about how election years tend to be good ones for stocks.
However, historically, every year of the 4-year presidential cycle tends to be a good one for stocks.
Are these correlations totally spurious?
"No," argue many experts. Goldman Sachs' Jose Ursua, Professor Robert Prechter, and S&P Capital IQ's Sam Stovall are among the voices that note that election cycles have major economic and behavioral implications for the stock markets.
We cobbled together everything we know about the connection between stocks and presidents. Maybe, you'll find it to be a useful guide to the stock market and perhaps even the election.
It's still an election year and the presidential campaign rages on.
Everyone is making a lot of noise about how election years tend to be good ones for stocks.
However, historically, every year of the 4-year presidential cycle tends to be a good one for stocks.
Are these correlations totally spurious?
"No," argue many experts. Goldman Sachs' Jose Ursua, Professor Robert Prechter, and S&P Capital IQ's Sam Stovall are among the voices that note that election cycles have major economic and behavioral implications for the stock markets.
We cobbled together everything we know about the connection between stocks and presidents. Maybe, you'll find it to be a useful guide to the stock market and perhaps even the election.
No comments:
Post a Comment