Thursday, June 15, 2017

Interesting Items 2

If this Supreme Court justice does not recuse herself from any cases involving President Trump.  She has repeatedly violated the code guiding judicial behavior by speaking negatively about Trump.  Not recusing herself will taint any case outcome particularly if she would rule against him.  Besides she needs to retire for the sake of the court.  Given her sometimes erratic behavior and misstatements there is some doubt that she retains full command of all of her faculties.    More.

This is why it was a big mistake to ever allow federal workers to establish a union.  They turn into political animals spending money to improve their lot in life rather than working for the people.  Quote:"One of the nation's most influential labor unions spent $20 million more on politics than it did representing the interests of its members in 2016, according to its federal labor filing. The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) spent $55.3 million on "political activities and lobbying" in 2016 compared to the $36.4 million in expenditures related to "representational activities," such as contract negotiations and grievance managements for its membership, according to its 2016 federal labor filings. Its political spending accounted for more than 27 percent of all its expenditures for the year."

This is another disturbing trend that has been underway for a long time.  Hopefully, Trump will have another opportunity to place another level headed constitutionalist on the bench to help balance the court's history of overreach.  Quote: "When all is said and done, what these assorted court rulings add up to is a disconcerting government mindset that interprets the Constitution one way for the elite—government entities, the police, corporations and the wealthy—and uses a second measure altogether for the underclasses—that is, you and me."

At some point the political left will see what a travesty this is.  Could it be that these are frustrated boys who could not compete with their same sex competitors?  Seems like changing sex makes them champion "female" athletes.   Their motives need to be challenged - maybe they think they can't make it as a male so the solution is to claim to be female.   Here's more.   In my mind it is most unfair to real females.  Indeed, the real girls are afraid to say anything because insane leftist political correctness forbids shaming transsexuals.  What a mess.

There is no question that this is a legitimate petition and should be supported by all Canadian citizens.  Quote: "LifeSiteNews has launched a petition urging the Ontario government to repeal a new bill that allows children to be seized from Christian parents who oppose the LGBT agenda."    When a government gets this totalitarian it is no longer a legitimate government.  The LGBT agenda is an illegitimate one in that its objective is to destroy the traditional family unit, religious liberties and moral sexual behavior.

I have wondered about this question many times.  There were certainly a number of times Obama committed impeachable offenses, at least in my mind.  Anyway this piece addresses that subject.    The cowards that populate the Republican party did nothing in the face of overwhelming evidence.  Nonetheless, I understand why they didn't act.  My guess is that they knew the racial backlash that would follow and likely end up with massive violence in the streets perpetrated by leftist activists. But they knew full well the Democrats and mainstream media would fake news the horrible Republicans to death.  That is the very real double standard that the liberals have imposed on our society.  Their unethical, dishonest and destructive PC efforts are slowly dividing the citizenry and destroying our country.

Want to read about an act of insane leftist madness?  Quote: "Every year the Sydney Peace Foundation bestows their Global Peace Prize on extraordinary people who advocate for “true and lasting peace” by ending “war and violent conflict” through addressing “deep injustices and structural inequality.”  And, "And the winner of the 2017 Global Peace Prize goes to…Drum roll…Black Lives Matter."   This is proof positive that liberals support terrorist groups and terrorism itself.  They care not one whit about real peace or real justice.  Criminal activities like killing police are just fine and are to be applauded in order to achieve their demented goals.

Some Clinton dirty laundry just got exposed.  It shed light on something they do not want us to see/know.  Quote: "Now, here’s a woman who said she believes the Paris Agreement is sacrosanct because it protects the environment. Yet, what did she do when she may have had to fly on the same plane as Michelle Obama during her time as secretary of state? She demanded another one."   Is that racist???

Even the liberal Harvard Law School believe the pre-born are humans and have rights.  Quote: "The Fourteenth Amendment, which was adopted in 1868, declares that no state shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” A debate that has been raging in courtrooms for years is whether the “life” part includes unborn persons.  Harvard Law student Joshua Craddock did some constitutional soul searching to answer that question in a new report for the Harvard Law Journal, concluding that unborn babies do fall under the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections."  

Planned Parenthood in the state of Missouri violated laws over multiple years.  It is highly probable that this is not the only state with this illegal activity going on. This is in addition to the illegal sale of baby parts.  Yet, this organization receives tax payer dollars and is lauded by the political left.

This woman is an embarrassment to people in elected office, her constituents, House of Representatives and our country.  Quote: "What is it that motivates Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters? Is it her unbridled passion for her job? Or is it the obscene profits she and her family have been earning from her Congressional earmarks and minority banking connections?  In this video clip, Waters is shown berating President Trump as she’s been known to do (and some might even say incentivized to do by her party). But at the end of the clip, she seems to insist that as both a member of Congress and a woman of color she could not be impeached herself.  Unfortunately for Waters, neither of these statements is true, as the Constitution allows both the House of Representatives and the Senate to impeach one of their own members by a two-thirds majority vote. Whether that Congressperson is a woman or a person of color has no bearing on the process."    She is a product of long standing actions and policies of the liberal/progressive political establishment.  She has been convinced that as a black woman she is untouchable.  That is after all what liberals/progressives have promoted for years.  The consequences are not pretty.

No comments: