There is much room for legitimate, good-faith debate about the strength of evidence against Hunter Biden and, separately, his father Joe.
This tableau of potential Biden family corruption amounts to a test of the bona fides of modern "Investigative" journalists.
Showing stronger culpability, the emerging evidence from credible whistleblowers verifies that the Biden administration, through its Justice Department, fixed the prosecution of Hunter, refusing indictments both in D.C. and Los Angeles, allowing statutes of limitation to expire, and refusing proper investigative steps recommended by IRS agents.
Rather than viewing the Luft indictment as proof of a Biden retaliatory cover-up, its pundit saw that the indictment "Damaged the credibility" of the case against Biden.
To Arthur Delaney of the HuffPost, the indictment of Luft for FARA violations demonstrated how weak any FARA claimwould have been against Hunter Biden.
The reasoning? Unlike Luft, Hunter did virtually nothing for his pay! How can we say he's a foreign agent if he got his money without providing any apparent services? Thus, according to investigator Delaney, there is a large "Hole" in the case against Hunter Biden.
Despite their years of efforts-including Mr. Trump's attempts to muscle Ukraine into helping him sully the Bidens, an escapade that led to his first impeachment-Republicans have yet to demonstrate that the senior Mr. Biden was involved in his son's business deals or took any action to benefit him or his foreign partners.
No comments:
Post a Comment