It now seems clear what occurred to bring down CIA Director David
Petraeus: some months ago his paramour Paula Broadwell sent threatening
emails to another woman warning her to keep away from Petraeus,
seemingly unaware that computers and emails have signatures that can be
identified by investigators. The woman, identified by the Associated
Press as Jill Kelley,
became alarmed over being threatened and notified the FBI, which got
into the emails to discover that there was an affair in progress,
leading to an investigation of Petraeus to determine if any classifed
information had been leaked. Broadwell was subsequently interviewed by
FBI agents, as was Petraeus two weeks ago. The Justice
Department informed Director of National Intelligence James Clapper
about the affair on election night, which led to a phone call to
Petraeus. Clapper recommended that he resign and informed the White
House. Petraeus met with the president on Thursday and submitted his
resignation, which was accepted on Friday.
Adultery is not exactly uncommon at CIA, but the Director operates at a much more political level than do the other ranks. There are some interesting questions being raised about the timing. Petraeus knew he would be exposed when he was interviewed by the FBI, if not before through Broadwell. Due to its sensitivity, Attorney General Eric Holder, to whom the FBI reports, had to know about the investigation as soon as the link to Petraeus was established, and he must have also known about the adultery. Is it plausible that he did not inform the president? Was it Petraeus’s personal decision to wait until after the election before submitting his resignation?
Read more: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/a-cia-coup/
Adultery is not exactly uncommon at CIA, but the Director operates at a much more political level than do the other ranks. There are some interesting questions being raised about the timing. Petraeus knew he would be exposed when he was interviewed by the FBI, if not before through Broadwell. Due to its sensitivity, Attorney General Eric Holder, to whom the FBI reports, had to know about the investigation as soon as the link to Petraeus was established, and he must have also known about the adultery. Is it plausible that he did not inform the president? Was it Petraeus’s personal decision to wait until after the election before submitting his resignation?
Read more: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/a-cia-coup/
No comments:
Post a Comment