Executive summary
I couldn’t have done this without your help. Everyone is going to blame this on the other guy and not accept any responsibility. The White House will blame the FDA and former President Trump. I now have a fully objective method that proves that the COVID vaccines killed hundreds of thousands of innocent Americans who trusted the healthcare authorities and mainstream media and took the shot. The attempts to gaslight, censor, and defame me are over.
The survey
Here’s the Substack article that gave me the data all the data I needed.
The main results
You were over 15% more likely to die if you got the COVID vaccine from all-cause mortalityYou were 12X more likely to have a turbo cancer vs. the unvaccinatedOverall odds were 2.2 higher that you won’t die normally. In other words, “died suddenly” is absolutely real. COVID vaccines have killed 3.5X more people than COVID virus and 70X in lost person-years which is devastating.
Over 15% higher death rate
That’s a 3X higher death rate on month 1 after the vaccine. That’s clearly the minimum excess death rate. So spread over 12 months, we get 14/12=1.166 which is a 17% higher excess death rate.
Turbo cancer reports are 12X higher in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated
Dr. Drew just called me wanting to know if turbo cancers are being caused by the COVID vaccine. There seems to be a 12x increase in the rate of turbo cancers among those who died since 2021 with respect to the unvaccinated. The images below are pivot tables from Airtable. Date of death is the x-axis, symptoms are the y-axis. Regular cancer is 15/113=13.3%.Here are the vaxxed numbers:Turbo Cancer rate is 98/462 = 21.2% of all reports. Are you surprised by this stunning finding?
Sudden death OR 2.2 p=.005
COVID vaccines have killed 3.5X more people than COVID virus and 70X in lost person-years
This is hard to explain away because it was confirmed by so many others. John Beaudoin found a 70X difference when you account for the man years lost by the two. This was the greatest mistake in US history. We literally made the problem 70X worse (in terms of direct loss man years) with the shots. The 70X does not include impacts on young families who lost a young father or mother.
Community replication offer: a way for you to easily replicate the results and see for yourself. It cannot be gamed by either party.
If you are skeptical, there is an easy way for you to verify it’s on the level with no effort on your part. Choose a unique referral code and mail it to your friends and tell them to fill out my survey with their email and referral code. I will give you a link to enable you to access all their records so you can verify the emails and results match up (you can fill out a few yourself to test this).Since only you know the emails of your friends (and I don’t), it is impossible for me to game the survey. Nor can I delete or modify entries since that is detectable since the counts and data won’t match. So you’ll be wasting everyone’s time if you think you can game it.
Data transparency offer
Data analysis makes the most sense if a serious person is analyzing the data. People like Chris Rentsch are out to manipulate the data analysis with a goal of discrediting the data rather than finding the truth. I messaged Chris and said, “OK, after you removed the entries that were defective, did it change the result?” He refused to answer my question and as you can see from his post it was all a hit piece without any mention that surveys always have to be cleaned up (I didn’t clean it up because I post the raw data to be fully transparent) and most importantly Chris completely avoided saying what the data says. His goal was to nit pick the errors which always happen.
Was it biased? Not in any way that would impact the outcome.
Nobody knew the purpose of the survey, how it would be measured, etc. He was a fire department Captain at a major airport. The physical demands of his job made proper diet and fitness mandatory. But as you can see that this isn’t the case at all:Airtable survey of my readers for how they became first aware that vaccines were bad. So any bias is very minimal because each responder basically had no choice to pick the person who died suddenly. All surveys have bias, but there is no evidence whatsoever that these results are explainable by “bias.”Nor can the results be explained by the “healthy vaccinee effect (HVE).” HVE reduces death in the early weeks after a vaccine because people who are about to die don’t get vaccinated.
Could the survey have been gamed in either direction? Nope.
The survey is devastating for the pro-vaccine people. What was reported here are things that happened in the past. The poll results are independently verifiable through public records by independent researchers. There were no deleting of records (can be verified at Airtable) The only way it could be gamed and look legit is if someone had a list of people who died within 28 days of vaccination and emailed all those people to respond, all within 24 hours. Nobody has such a database AFAIK.So it is possible it could have been gamed, but it is highly unlikely.
Is this a scientific survey?
Yes, because I collected contact info of each respondent. A scientific survey requires facts and independent verification. Also the respondents were randomly selected because it was random which people knew the details on a deceased. And there was no selection bias because the people only had 1 death to choose from in most all cases. Every survey has bias and as far as this one goes, it was very unbiased.
Is there a way to increase confidence in the result?
Several ways:Have someone with a completely different follower base run the same studySee if anyone can explain the 3X elevation of the first bar with a theory that has evidentiary support. The anecdotal data suggests people die shortly after the shot and this data aligns with that. If it’s a valid survey and the results are valid, others should be able to replicate it. So replication is the simplest way to find the truth. They could be champions of public health data transparency.
How credible is this result?
Yale Professor Harvey Risch, one of the top epidemiologists in the world, invited me on his podcast tonight to discuss the results. He’s already seen the survey and the results. You’ll be able to watch the episode after it is posted here. Do you think he would be doing that if it wasn’t credible?
Why has nobody seen this before?
No mainstream pro-vaccine doctor has ever called for data transparency of public health data. They are not required to link the records for you. I couldn’t get the UK ONS to publish their record level data. They said it would be a violation of the law. When I offered to pay, they stopped talking to me.
Nobody should be surprised by this result. Nobody.
I found out the vaccines were unsafe in May 2021 because my friends were being injured at a rate that was statistically impossible. Normally, there are 0.So what did the CDC do when the alarm bells went off? Signals like pulmonary embolism were off the charts, for example. So you don’t need to be a rocket scientist on data to figure this out. Americans should never trust the CDC again for anything.
What are the implications of this?
Americas doctors who promoted these deadly vaccines which have no benefit have blood on their hands. The very least they should be doing now is apologizing, asking for forgiveness, demanding data transparency of public health data, refusing to give any more vaccines of any type until the public health data is made public, and so on. The mainstream media is in a similar spot. She literally called the cops on me so she would not have to look at the data. They should revoke the licenses of doctors who promoted these deadly vaccines. They should reinstate my account and publicly apologize.
By the way, in case you didn’t know, here are a few more things you need to know about the flu and COVID vaccines
The flu vaccine is completely ineffective. It can kill you (I have the Medicare data to prove this) and it will NOT protect you from hospitalization or death. Bottom line: all risk and no net benefit whatsoever. The COVID vaccine will make it more likely for you to be infected, it will have no benefit on hospitalization, and it will make you more likely to die if you get COVID, and it increases non-COVID all-cause mortality. I’ll be publishing a paper in the peer-reviewed medical literature on this soon.
Why am I not on John Campbell’s show?
Because if I appeared, YouTube will delete his channel.
MedCram founder Roger Seheult could replicate this survey in a heartbeat but he won’t even try
He won’t dare try to replicate my survey. He does the opposite taking great lengths to create a YouTube video to try to gaslight people into believing there is no signal in VAERS. He demanded to know how I got his number and then he hung up on me. Do we get better health outcomes by hiding the data Roger? Why don’t you do a YouTube video on why public health data should be hidden.
You can profit from this article but I cannot
If you think I’m lying, go purchase Moderna and Pfizer stock. If you think I’m telling the truth, short these stocks. Let’s see who the smart money believes, shall we?Full Disclosure: I was short Moderna stock, but I just covered my short position as of 12:10pm 10/31/23 so I cannot profit from a drop. Therefore, I have no conflicts of interest. I am doing this so nobody can accuse me of profiting from this article.
If you like the work I’m doing, please consider becoming a paid subscriber so I can keep doing this and afford to get the word out to people
Today, I spend about 3X as many dollars as I receive from Substack subscriptions. I’d like to have the funds to make my work more visible outside of my subscriber base.
They lied about “safe and effective.” I can now prove it wasn’t safe, that it did NOT reduce risk of infection or hospitalization, and it increased the risk of death from COVID.60 Minutes and the rest of the mainstream media should be allowing America to hear the evidence on both sides and decide for themselves. But maybe Tucker Carlson will talk to me. In the meantime, we now have the tools to prove we were right. But it seems nobody in power wants to use the tools. That tells you everything you need to know, doesn’t it?Please share this post and also repost my post on X. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment