A week passes, and thus far the Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid has yet to tell us whether he is or is not having
sexual relations with a cow. As was reported in this column last
week, based on sources in the field, Mr. Reid has been involved
with the cow for at least three months, possibly more. My sources
cannot be identified for obvious reasons. Even the New York
Times would not reveal their identities. The story is
that hot.
It is, of course, possible that the relationship is purely platonic. On the other hand, possibly Mr. Reid is more involved with the cow than might have been anticipated. It is time for him to come clean. He owes it to the American people and conceivably to the Department of Agriculture. Preferably he should make his statement on the floor of the Senate, which he reserves for such solemn occasions. For instance, his recent charge that the probable Republican presidential candidate, Mr. Mitt Romney, has paid no taxes for the better part of ten years was made there. His statement about the cow is no less important. Mr. Reid, we are waiting.
Yet let us now move on from Mr. Reid and his relationship -- platonic or otherwise -- with that cow (Bos primigenius), and let us come to the heart of the matter. What does President Barack Obama have to say for himself and his party? In this election year, does not the President as leader of his Democratic Party have an obligation to the American people to look into such serious charges? There are, of course, moral questions here and possibly questions regarding animal rights. Perhaps the Democrats are expanding the moral parameters in this affair. Well, it is not like them to refrain from boasting about it.
Read more: http://spectator.org/archives/2012/08/16/harry-reids-cow-and-joe-bidens
It is, of course, possible that the relationship is purely platonic. On the other hand, possibly Mr. Reid is more involved with the cow than might have been anticipated. It is time for him to come clean. He owes it to the American people and conceivably to the Department of Agriculture. Preferably he should make his statement on the floor of the Senate, which he reserves for such solemn occasions. For instance, his recent charge that the probable Republican presidential candidate, Mr. Mitt Romney, has paid no taxes for the better part of ten years was made there. His statement about the cow is no less important. Mr. Reid, we are waiting.
Yet let us now move on from Mr. Reid and his relationship -- platonic or otherwise -- with that cow (Bos primigenius), and let us come to the heart of the matter. What does President Barack Obama have to say for himself and his party? In this election year, does not the President as leader of his Democratic Party have an obligation to the American people to look into such serious charges? There are, of course, moral questions here and possibly questions regarding animal rights. Perhaps the Democrats are expanding the moral parameters in this affair. Well, it is not like them to refrain from boasting about it.
Read more: http://spectator.org/archives/2012/08/16/harry-reids-cow-and-joe-bidens
No comments:
Post a Comment