The Two, Three, One State Solution

 The ongoing debate around the recognition of a Palestinian state, evaluating historical context, and the complexities surrounding the two-state solution. The author, John F. Di Leo, critiques the narratives created around Palestinian statehood and highlights misunderstandings regarding the existing geopolitical landscape.

1. Historical Context of Statehood:

• Fables and fairy tales are compared to the current discussion around Palestinian statehood, emphasizing that historical lessons are often ignored.

• The concept of a Palestinian state has been under consideration since the end of World War I.

• A two-state solution was previously enacted when Israel and Jordan were established from the British Mandate for Palestine.

2. Creation of the Kingdom of Jordan:

• The author argues that Jordan is effectively a Palestinian state, housing a significant Palestinian Arab population.

• The existence of Jordan is overlooked by advocates of a new Palestinian state, leading to misconceptions.

3. The Reality of Current Palestinian Leadership:

• There is a critique of Palestinian leadership groups such as Hamas and Fatah for corruption and violence, leading to calls for support rather than blame.

• The portrayal of these groups as leaders seeking freedom for Palestinians is challenged by detailing their history of violence against Israel and misuse of aid.

4. Misrepresentation of Israel:

• The narrative portrays Israel as an oppressive regime, while the author argues it is a functioning democracy offering rights to all its citizens.

• The article claims that most criticisms of Israel are based on historical ignorance and distortion.

5. International Responses to Palestinian Claims:

• Recent political statements, like those from the United Kingdom regarding Palestinian statehood, are criticized for lacking awareness of historical and current realities.

• The issue of reparations demanded by Palestinian groups is highlighted, indicating a continued focus on financial compensation rather than achieving peace.

6. Recurring Violence:

• The author references terrorist acts by Hamas, especially the significant violence of October 7, 2023, to emphasize the ongoing threat.

• Such incidents are used to argue that Palestinian aspirations may ultimately aim for one state, where Israel ceases to exist.

The article presents a critical view of the Palestinian statehood discourse, suggesting it is rooted in historical myths and misunderstandings. The author calls attention to the delusions surrounding Palestinian leadership and their claimed victimhood while highlighting the existing state of Jordan. He portrays Israeli democracy as a stark contrast to the chaos presented by Palestinian factions, arguing that the ultimate aim of certain groups is the complete eradication of Israel rather than the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. The piece concludes by stressing the need for realistic understanding and acknowledgment of the truths behind this complex issue.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/09/the_two_three_one_state_solution.html