Pouring Money Down The CO2 Drain

The UK government has announced the construction of two significant carbon capture projects aimed at reducing carbon emissions and creating skilled jobs. However, there are concerns about the high costs associated with these initiatives and the potential long-term economic impact.

1. New Projects Launched:

• The two projects are the UK’s first carbon capture-enabled cement plant at Padeswood and a waste-to-energy facility at Protos in Ellesmere Port.

• They are expected to create around 500 skilled clean energy jobs in North Wales and the North West.

2. Government Funding:

• The projects are part of a broader £21.7 billion funding promise made over 25 years to support five connected carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects.

• An additional £9.4 billion was allocated in the June spending review for carbon capture initiatives, with further investments planned.

3. Funding Sources:

• Most of the funding will be sourced from levies on consumers, which will likely increase energy bills for households.

• Financial commitments include £45.1 billion designated for the Department of Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) until 2029.

4. Economic Concerns:

• Critics argue that the spending on carbon capture is a waste of taxpayer money, as it does not create tangible economic value.

• There is skepticism regarding the effectiveness of carbon capture technologies and their ability to significantly reduce overall emissions.

5. Public Opinion:

• There’s a growing divide between the government’s climate policies and public sentiment, with many citizens expressing frustration over the economic burden of such initiatives.

• Polls indicate a dissatisfaction among voters, particularly with high costs linked to net-zero strategies.

The UK's commitment to carbon capture projects represents a significant investment in climate change technology, aiming to create jobs and reduce emissions. However, the financial implications and public perception of these strategies raise important questions about their economic viability and effectiveness in addressing climate change. As these initiatives progress, ongoing scrutiny regarding their costs and benefits will likely continue. 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/09/26/pouring-money-down-the-co2-drain/