The Media Keeps Confusing Freedom of the Press With Press Access

 The article argues that the media's claim of fighting for freedom of the press is misguided. It highlights the difference between press access and actual freedom of speech.

• Misinterpretation of Freedom of the Press: AP executive editor Julie Pace asserts that by seeking exclusive access to the White House, the Associated Press is defending free speech. However, the author contends that access is not a right but a privilege, which is granted to select groups.

• Government Interference: The author suggests that while the government has not strictly censored the press, it has shown favoritism, denying access to certain media outlets based on political leaning. The article implies that conservative voices face more restrictions than their liberal counterparts.

• Freedom of Speech Defined: The core belief is that freedom of speech includes the ability to express opinions and consume news without government interference, rather than merely having access to events. Pace's usage of the term "consume" in her argument is seen as indicative of a passive approach to free speech.

• Media’s Elite Status: The text criticizes the media for believing they belong to a privileged class with the right to operate without scrutiny, positioning themselves as defenders of free speech while prioritizing their access.

The article stresses that true freedom of the press is about the ability to publicly discuss and report on politics without censorship by platforms or the government, rather than just maintaining privileged access to governmental events. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-media-keeps-confusing-freedom-of-the-press-with-press-access/