There are ongoing efforts to investigate judicial corruption involving bribery through mortgages. However, this crucial work is facing significant challenges as several key individuals report retaliation and barriers that impede their efforts.
1. Judiciary Compromise Disruption:
The investigation into how judges may be financially compromised through mortgage schemes is being obstructed, with fewer people working on the issue.
2. Retaliation Against Renee Wyler:
Renee Wyler, a Michigan mortgage broker, claims she cannot find work due to a contested protective order allegedly initiated by the Law Enforcement Information Network (LEIN). This situation has adversely affected her husband, who had to take a lower-paying job.
3. Rick Abrams Denied Law License:
Rick Abrams, a California attorney, has been denied his license after publishing articles revealing connections between mortgages and judicial corruption.
4. Legislator Liz Harris's Dismissal:
Arizona Legislator Liz Harris was removed from the state legislature after sponsoring a discussion on mortgage bribery, despite a presentation she supported being groundbreaking.
5. Investigative Reporter Challenges:
The investigative reporter has faced difficulties accessing public records, leading to discrepancies in the search results for mortgage information related to judges, such as Judge Jason Disbrow and David Belz.
6. Attempts for Protection:
The reporter is also seeking help from El Mecanismo, a Mexican agency tasked with protecting journalists, but has received little response and feels the agency may be politicized.
7. Press Freedom Concerns:
The journalist expresses concern that their work is hindered despite constitutional protections for the press. The urgency surrounding judicial corruption remains high, with uncertainty about the judges' possible actions.
The investigation into judicial corruption and the use of mortgages for bribery is facing severe disruptions and retaliatory actions against individuals trying to expose the truth. The situation raises significant questions about the accountability of judges and the protection of whistleblowers in these cases.
No comments:
Post a Comment