Mainstream and Social Media and Fact Checkers 4

Anyone who believes the mainstream and social media are honest and factual sources of truth are hopelessly gullible. They are the most deceptive and irresponsible left-wing propaganda agents possible. To them revealing a factual truth is immoral and should never happen. The only truth acceptable comes from their self-created Marxist oriented false narratives. So, they censor the actual truth to protect their precious false narratives. Everyone is better off believing their incessant lies. This is a classic example of just how corrupt radical leftists are. Quote: "The loony Left finally got their wish. Someone silenced Tucker Carlson. And Tucker Carlson just got suspended for one reason that you won’t believe. Social media companies are now censoring the truth by calling it “hate speech.” Tucker Carlson and other conservatives learned this lesson the hard way. Twitter locked the account of the satirical Christian site, Babylon Bee, over a tweet where the Bee mocked transgender Biden administration official Rachel Levin by giving him its man of the year award. Twitter will not allow the Bee back into its account unless it deletes the Tweet in question. Twitter also locked the account of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk for speaking the truth that Levine is really a man. “Richard Levine spent 54 years of his life as a man,” Kirk wrote in the “offending” tweet. “He had a wife and a family. He ‘transitioned’ to being a woman in 2011. Joe Biden appointed Levine to be a 4-Star Admiral and now USA Today has named ‘Rachel’ Levine as a ‘Woman of the Year.’ Where are the feminists?” Tucker Carlson posted a screenshot of Kirk and the Babylon Bee’s tweets and wrote, “But wait. Both of these tweets are true.”       

       Carlson is now locked out of his account until he deletes that Tweet. Carlson, the Babylon Bee, and Charlie Kirk refuse to delete their tweets because that would be an admission that they were wrong and that a guy born Richard Levine is really a woman named Rachel Levine. Social media companies want to completely censor the American conversation by forcing users to say what they know to be false. It’s like in 1984 when O’Brien tortures Winston Smith by gleefully showing how the Party can get anyone to admit that 2+2=5 as the greatest form of control. Twitter suspending Carlson, the Babylon Bee, and Charlie Kirk’s accounts also represents social media companies cracking down on conservative speech and views ahead of the 2022 Midterm elections.

       Polls show Democrats are on track to lose control of the House of Representatives and the Senate in November. That’s why Twitter is meddling in the election and suspending as many prominent conservatives as they can. Social media companies got away with rigging the 2020 election by censoring true stories about the Biden family’s corruption. Twitter and Facebook got away with helping to install Joe Biden in office. Now Twitter is reaching back into that playbook to censor conservatives ahead of the Midterms."  Tucker Carlson just got suspended for one reason that you won’t believe - Renewed Right   

        The moral of this piece is to never ever believe anything devoted radical left wingers regardless of political affiliation say. They are all compulsive liars and charlatans who hate truth and facts that do not fit neatly into their massive array of destructive Marxist based false narratives.

The mainstream media's reputation for lying, misdirection, censorship and more is rightfully being challenge by more and more people. This is a classic example. Quote: "Dr. Robert Malone Sues The New York Times for Defamation. 

“A line has been crossed,” says Dr. Robert Malone. Malone revealed on his Substack newsletter that he has sued The New York Times for defamation.  Malone shared a letter from Steven S. Bliss, Attorney at Law, to David E. McCraw, Senior Vice President & Deputy General Counsel The New York Times Company, and Davey Alba.  An article written by Alba titled “The Latest Covid Misinformation Star Says He Invented the Vaccines” appears to have triggered the lawsuit.  The letter from Malone’s Substack reads:

         Dear Mr. McCraw and Ms. Alba:

I represent Dr. Robert W. Malone in connection with his claims against The New York Times Company (“NYT”), Davey Alba (“Alba”) and unknown editors and publishers for defamation, defamation by implication and insulting words. On April 3, 2022, NYT published an article on its website written by Alba, entitled “The Latest Covid Misinformation Star Says He Invented the Vaccines”. Expectedly, NYT and Alba repeatedly republished the Article via social media. [See, e.g., hers Twitter Post 1 and her Twitter Post 2].

The Article contains false and defamatory statements of fact of or concerning Dr. Malone, including:  

1. The headline misrepresents that Dr. Malone is the “Latest Covid Misinformation Star” and further states that “[e]ven two years into the pandemic, new misinformation stars are being minted”;

2. The Article falsely accuses Dr. Malone of “spreading unfounded claims about the vaccines and the virus”; 

3. The Article falsely states that “in recent months, as the coronavirus pandemic has persisted, he has taken up an entirely different role: spreading misinformation about the virus and vaccines on conservative programs”; 

4. The Article misrepresents that “Dr. Malone joins medical professionals and scientists, like Dr. Joseph Mercola and Dr. Judy Mikovits, whose profiles have grown during the pandemic as they spread misinformation about mask-wearing and convoluted conspiracy theories about virus experts like Dr. Anthony Fauci”;

5. The Article misrepresents that “Dr. Malone has twisted legitimate policy debates to use them as cover for continuing to spread misinformation and to advance claims about the pandemic that are demonstrably incorrect”;

6. “Robert Malone is exploiting the fact that data-driven course correction is inherent to the scientific process to peddle disinformation. It’s extraordinarily dishonest and morally bankrupt”.

In addition to the above false statements, the Article misrepresents Dr. Malone’s credentials, role and achievements in the development of mRNA technology and vaccines:

7. The Article misrepresents that “[w]hile he was involved in some early research into the technology, his role in its creation was minimal at best”; and

8. The Article misstates that “[t]he idea that he is the inventor of mRNA vaccines is a totally false claim”.

      Significantly, Dr. Malone offered to show Alba the evidence concerning his research and invention of the mRNA technology, but Alba refused to review it.  NYT and Alba’s false statements were immediately understood to convey a defamatory meaning about Dr. Malone, see, e.g.: 

The letter demands an “immediate public retraction of the false and defamatory statements in the Article, a written apology, and compensation for the presumed and actual damages suffered by Dr. Malone, including the insult, pain, humiliation, embarrassment, mental suffering and injury to his reputation.” The retractions must “prominently notify NYT’s online advertisers, subscribers, and viewers, and NYT and Alba’s social media followers, that NYT and Alba retract and withdraw the scandalous statements in the Article,” according to the letter. NYT has been given 30 days from the date of the letter to take action and resolve the matter. If they refuse or if retractions are insufficient, Dr. Malone “intends to take appropriate legal action to protect his rights and interests.”    Dr. Robert Malone Sues The New York Times for Defamation (welovetrump.com)