Saturday, October 18, 2025

Michigan’s SOS Jocelyn Benson’s Laughable 2024 Election Audit Is Worse Than Anyone Imagined—“Random” Sampling Conveniently Excluded State’s Most Crooked City—Why?

The election audit conducted in Michigan after the 2024 elections, raising serious questions about its effectiveness and credibility. It argues that the sampling methods used in the audit are flawed and may undermine public trust in the election process.

1. Suspicious Audit Methods:

• The Michigan Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson, announced an impressive 99.97% accuracy rate in ballot counting.

• However, the audit's "random" sampling deliberately excluded Detroit and Troy, two cities with significant electoral challenges, raising doubts about the thoroughness of the audit.

2. Delays and Lack of Transparency:

• The audit took ten months to complete, twice as long as the previous 2020 audit. This delay has been criticized for reducing transparency and failing to provide timely public scrutiny after the elections.

3. Narrow Focus of the Audit:

• While the audit confirmed that votes were counted accurately, it did not assess whether those votes were cast by eligible voters or whether the ballots adhered to legal requirements, such as matching signatures and valid addresses.

4. Concerns Identified in Voter Registrations:

• A study by the Michigan Fair Elections Institute, which reviewed a sample of inactive registrations, uncovered alarming patterns, including deceased voters and dual registrations.

• Nearly 400,000 voters in Michigan have been inactive for an extended period, raising concerns about the legitimacy of registrations.

5. Issues with Voter Data Integrity:

• The audit failed to address serious concerns about voter data maintenance, which is supposed to comply with federal standards.

• Problems with equipment security and the integrity of voting system certifications were overlooked, despite documented vulnerabilities.

6. Call for Systematic Changes:

• The article calls for a systematic cleanup of voter registrations and better enforcement of federal record retention laws to ensure election integrity.

• Future audits are urged to be conducted with independent protocols and thorough examinations of all relevant aspects of the electoral process.

The 2024 election audit in Michigan, while showing that ballots were counted accurately, raised significant concerns regarding its methods, the exclusion of key areas, and failures to assess voter eligibility. For true election integrity, a more comprehensive and transparent audit process that includes independent oversight and solid verification of voter registrations and equipment security is crucial. The article emphasizes that all aspects of the electoral process need scrutiny to build public trust. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/10/oops-michigans-sos-jocelyn-bensons-laughable-2024-election/

No comments:

Post a Comment