The recent decision by some Western allies of the U. S. to recognize a "Palestinian" state. The author, Josh Hammer, argues that this recognition undermines international law and rewards terrorism while rejecting the historical and current realities of the conflict.
1. Ally Recognition: The author states that countries such as Britain, Australia, France, and Canada have discredited themselves by recognizing a so-called Palestinian state, arguing that this action rewards terrorism and distorts the process of international legitimacy.
2. Condemnation of Terrorism: The article mentions the brutal attack on Israel by Hamas on October 7, 2023, which resulted in numerous deaths and kidnappings. The author underscores this as a pivotal event that should shape the understanding of potential statehood.
3. Public Support for Hamas: Hammer argues that many in the Palestinian territories support Hamas and likeminded groups, contradicting claims that these radical elements do not represent the broader population. He highlights polling data and public demonstrations showing this support.
4. Gaza's Government: The author describes the governance in Gaza as a form of theocratic, Iranian-backed terrorism that openly promotes violence against Israelis and Jew-hatred, branding the recognition of a Palestinian state as rewarding deeply problematic leadership.
5. Negotiation Rejection: Hammer notes that previous Western policies insisted on recognizing a Palestinian state only through direct negotiations with Israel and after assurances of peace, which he argues are now being disregarded.
6. Failed Peace Processes: The article asserts that past agreements, like the Oslo Accords, are seen as ineffective, as the current recognition of a Palestinian state undermines the efforts made to achieve peace through direct dialogue.
7. U. S. Response: The article suggests that President Donald Trump should oppose this recognition by proposing potential diplomatic or trade repercussions for countries that acknowledge a Palestinian state, asserting it harms U. S. interests.
8. Support for Israel: The author argues that the best way to foster peace in the region is to bolster Israel rather than undermine it through the creation of a new Palestinian state. He stresses that America's support for Israel is vital in defending broader Western values and interests.
The recognition of a Palestinian state by certain Western nations is portrayed as a dangerous step that endorses terrorism and violates principles of international negotiation and legitimacy. Hammer calls for a firm stance from the U. S. to uphold its ally Israel and reject any moves that weaken it, emphasizing that the ongoing conflict requires a thoughtful approach rather than appeasement. The author insists that America must stand resolutely with Israel as it faces threats to civilization.
No comments:
Post a Comment