Presumed Rigged Until Further Notice

The Guardian writes "Governor Brian Kemp tells Trump Georgia's 2020 election 'was not stolen'" without indicating that Governor Kemp's claim was unproven.

This constitutes, undeniably, a double standard, and the logical conclusion given the lack of proof means that until proven otherwise, the 2020 election was not not stolen.

The 2020 presidential election fraud deniers claim, without supporting proof, that there is no proof of "Outcome-determinative" fraud.

The general principles of public trust suggest the opposite presumption, that is that the elections must be beyond reproach, so they should be presumed not fair and honest unless there is compelling evidence that they were.

If the junta is powerful enough to conceal all the fraud and cheating it has committed and to intimidate its skeptics against publicly sharing the evidence of fraud and cheating, the voters will never be able to prove any election fraud.

Otherwise, anyone may have a good reason to believe that the election was stolen, and charging skeptics with the "Crime" of "Spreading misinformation" and "Lying" is not only absurdly wrong and unconstitutional but it also suggests that the election might have been stolen, indeed.

If you have to intimidate your skeptics or jail them in order to silence them, and to claim after you silenced them that there is "Consensus" that no "Outcome-determinative" election fraud took place in 2020, then I suppose that you must know that your denials cannot withstand serious and comprehensive public scrutiny and that you cannot prove that you did not steal the election. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/09/presumed_rigged_until_further_notice.html