What about private protection against disease and death? Don't the Covid vaccines at least protect individuals from getting sick and dying? Hanania repeats the conventional wisdom they do.
At the highest level, the assertion the Covid vaccines prevented severe disease and death cannot be squared with the explosion of morbidity and mortality around the high-income world in 2021, 2022, and 2023.
So does the explosion of adverse events detailed in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS. If one doesn't understand the bio-mechanisms, all these numbers will seem implausible, and "Long Covid" will be the unsatisfying fallback.
Independent sources agree with VAERS. V-Safe, for example, a brand new app-based program set up specifically for the Covid vaccine rollout, confirms the VAERS safety signals.
For my part, I've been vaccinated against Covid five times, but my understanding of how the vaccines work extends little deeper than "Something something mRNA antibodies immune system." I basically trust the people in the white coats who say they work.
What if, as during Covid, comparably credentialed scientists in white lab coats argued opposite viewpoints? What if Group A in white lab coats, deploying superficial platitudes, proved consistently and stubbornly wrong about six or seven major items - virus origins, mortality rates, risk stratification, early treatment, lockdown harms, recovered immunity, and vaccine efficacy? What if Group B, also in white lab coats, deploying exquisitely specific analysis of biology and data, while demonstrating humility and a willingness to learn, often debating among themselves, proved mostly correct about those same six or seven major items? What if members of Group B had also offered testable predictions, which later proved true?
Tyler claims China would have succeeded if only they'd stayed locked down until they embraced mRNA vaccines.
https://brownstone.org/articles/how-did-the-experts-turn-everything-upside-down/
No comments:
Post a Comment