Remember when the media and their political masters couldn't stop saying that red state governors had blood on their hands for opening their states while others were cowered by COVID? The data show it is those who kept their residents locked down and masked who cannot remove the Lady Macbeth-esque spot from their hands.
Associated Press reporter Ron Fournier tweeted that "The Georgia death toll is blood on" Kemp's hands, while The Atlantic was absolutely sure "The state is about to find out how many people need to lose their lives to shore up the economy." Washington Post published an execrable op-ed by columnist Dana Milbank with the headline "Georgia leads the race to become America's No. 1 Death Destination."
The phrase "Blood on his hands" when referring to any official who refused to continue the mask-and-lockdown charade was repeated by the media so many times that it could not have been an accident.
Like the lockdowns, masking not only had no beneficial effects, for many, it made matters worse.
Mask mandates almost certainly increased the spread of the coronavirus, and they also forced people to poison themselves, breathing in far more carbon dioxide than is healthy.
Although Lady Macbeth did not kill Duncan in Shakespeare's "Macbeth," she did dip her hands into the dead king's blood to show her husband, who did kill Duncan to take his crown, that they were equally guilty.
COVID blood on hands COVID lockdowns COVID tyranny Featured lockdowns kill mask mandates.
No comments:
Post a Comment