In a nutshell, I analyzed the "Gold standard" official US nursing home data and gave the vaccine every benefit of the doubt by analyzing it under "Best case conditions" when the vaccine matched the variant, and soon after the vaccine was given so that it would be before the protection waned and a booster would be required.
If the vaccines really worked, the IFR in the months after the vaccine should have plummeted, but it went up by 20%. In addition, an analysis of elderly facilities in Ireland was fully consistent with what my analysis found: death rates in nursing homes skyrocketed right after the vaccines rolled out.
We have excellent studies, such as the Cleveland Clinic study, showing the vaccine does the opposite: making you more likely to get COVID. And in nursing homes where we could validate the data from an insider, we learned that both the COVID rates and IFR dramatically increased right after the vaccine; this one facility cannot be explained away as a "Fluke." So the most likely hypothesis is that the virus simply burned itself out that the vaccine made things worse).
The very fact that NOBODY has ever published an analysis of this data showing the vaccines reduced IFR after the vaccine rollout in nursing homes in Dec 2020 tells you everything you need to know.
Show us one or more analyses of the Nursing Home Medicare data published in the peer-reviewed medical literature showing that the vaccines REDUCED THE IFR after it was administered or resulted in an OR value that was <1.
In plain English, it means that if there was a "Minimal detectable signal" post-vaccine as to whether the vaccine made things better or worse, it was up to 4X more likely that you'd find that in a nursing home where things got worse.
If the CMS Nursing home data proves the vaccines actually reduced COVID IFR where is their analysis of that? I found no evidence of this and looked at this data many different ways including very unconventional ways.
No comments:
Post a Comment