Tuesday, November 1, 2022

The Selfish Collective

 Much of the debate surrounding Covid has been framed in terms of individualism vs. collectivism

  • Individualists are motivated by self-interest while collectivists put their community first
  • This dichotomy paints the collective voice, or the community, as the prosocial option of two choices
  • The individual threatens the common good because they won't go along with the program everyone else has decided upon
  • There are several immediate problems with this logic
  • Loaded assumptions and false equivalencies
  • Equates the philosophy of collectivism with the idea of prosocial motivation
  • It equates prosocial behavior with conformity to a collective voice
  • emphasis on collective rather than individual action or identity
  • No mention here of internal motivations

When "Common Good" is Not Collective Will

  • Social groups are made up of individuals. Social concern involves negotiation, tolerance of value differences, and the ability to compromise or see nuance.
  • Someone motivated by genuine social concern asks the question: "What are the priorities and goals of all community members, and how can we try to satisfy these priorities in a way that everyone finds acceptable?"

Collective Narcissism and Conformity

  • In social psychology, collective narcissism is the extension of one's ego beyond oneself to a group or collective to which one belongs.
  • The emergent "personality" of the group mirrors the traits of narcissistic individuals
  • A heavy emphasis on binary themes
  • Discouraging free thinking
  • Prioritizing conformity
  • Distrusting or dishonoring differences of opinion
  • Pressure to display loyalty
  • An idealized group self-image

The Hidden Logic of Lockdown

  • The pro-mandate case follows the logic of the selfish collective
  • Restrictions and mandates will "stop the spread" of the virus, thereby saving lives and shielding people from harm it causes
  • How dangerous would the virus have to be in order for the restrictions and mandates to be justified?
  • Is any level of "dangerousness" enough? Or is there a threshold? Can we quantify these thresholds
  • What other "socially beneficial outcomes" are desirable, and from whose perspective? What other social priorities exist for various factions within the collective?

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-selfish-collective/

No comments:

Post a Comment