In a flurry of filings on Dec. 31, the defendants in the Whitmer case opposed a motion from federal prosecutors to exclude evidence about FBI agents involved in the investigation.
The motions follow the dismissal of one FBI agent in the Whitmer case for beating his wife.
Federal prosecutors have painted the slew of recent motions by the defendants as a stall tactic that threatens to delay the March 8 trial date.
In its motion to exclude evidence about Exeintel, prosecutors said Chambers's business had nothing to do with the Whitmer case.
The defendants argued otherwise in their Dec. 31 response, saying that Chambers's business entity calls into question whether he was investigating the Whitmer case in good faith.
Prosecutors haven't responded to the defense's motion to admit the statements as evidence, but they did oppose numerous motions in a Jan. 4 filing, including a Dec. 25 motion to dismiss, as well as a separate motion to extend filing deadlines.
"The defendants have filed a motion for more time to file more motions. They have already begun recycling the same motions previously denied, and identify no particular legal issues they expect to address given more time," prosecutors said.
It's becoming increasingly difficult to discern fact from fiction, and unfortunately the media has a strong bias. They spin stories to make conservatives look bad and will go to great lengths to avoid reporting on the good that comes from conservative policies. There are a few shining lights in the media landscape-brave conservative outlets that report the truth and offer a different perspective. We must support conservative outlets like this one and ensure that our voices are heard.
No comments:
Post a Comment