Quote: "
Test for new Omicron variant? We don’t need no stinkin’ test. . This
is an article in three layers. I’ve already spelled out the first layer
in my current series on the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 (archive: Omicron). In
a nutshell, there is no Omicron because there is no SARS-CoV-2. The
“pandemic virus” doesn’t exist. A variation of nothing equals
nothing. However, I often make forays into the bubble-world where most
people, including “the experts,” believe the virus is real. I do this to
show that, within their world, the experts are constantly lying in
their own terms and contradicting themselves. Within their world, you
would think the pros have an easily accessible test to identify the new
Omicron variant in thousands or millions of people. Otherwise, how can
they claim it’s here and spreading? But you would be wrong.
And I have the evidence, based on the prior variant, the Delta.
That’s level two. I take you there now, with an article I wrote months
ago: —Bombshell: PCR tests can’t identify Delta Variant; it’s all
fiction—Oooo. The Delta Variant. It’s everywhere. Watch out. It’s under
your rug. It’s in the clothes closet. It’s on your toothbrush. And it’s
The Unvaccinated who are spreading it. Those devils. We, who are pure,
must be protected from the unvaxxed Unclean.
Fauci, god of soccer moms, rises every morning saying DELTA, goes
on television saying DELTA, and goes to sleep praying to DELTA. But read
this from the Texas Department of State Health Services FAQ: “How can I
tell if I have the Delta variant? Do labs report that to the state?”
That information may not be readily available. The [PCR] viral tests
that are used to determine if a person has COVID-19 are not designed to
tell you what variant is causing the infection. Detecting the Delta
variant, or other variants, requires a special type of testing called
genomic sequencing. Due to the volume of COVID-19 cases, sequencing is
not performed on all viral samples. However, because the Delta variant
now accounts for the majority of COVID-19 cases in the United States,
there is a strong likelihood that a positive test result indicates
infection with the Delta variant.”
Boom.
I can assure you, the number of patients whose samples are
genetically sequenced is tiny, contrasted against the number whose
samples are simply run through the standard PCR." There is much more,
so read on. Test for new Omicron variant? We don’t need no stinkin’ test « Jon Rappoport's Blog (nomorefakenews.com)
Quote: "
Why I am Proud to Wear the "Anti-Vaxx" Label - History and Science Show Vaccines Have NEVER Been Safe nor Effective. If
you have been following the Alternative Media for any period of time
now, seeking for the truth to combat the deception and lies that are
coming from the pharma-funded corporate news media, you have undoubtedly
heard testimonies from victims of the COVID-19 shots begin their
testimony with the assertion: "I am not an anti-vaxxer." The
presupposition that most of these people have, whether doctors or
members of the public who were fooled into taking one of the COVID-19
gene-alerting shots, is that vaccines are generally safe and effective,
but the COVID-19 shots are not, and should not even be called "vaccines"
because they don't meet the historical definition of a "vaccine." For
example, a recent post by a medical doctor who confessed that they had
never bothered to really research the vaccine issue in the past, and has
come to realize that there is no science at all behind the COVID-19
shots, and has been banned on specific social media platforms for daring
to question the COVID-19 vaccine narrative, wrote this: "Please, let me
be clear: I am not commenting here on the safety or effectiveness of
any vaccines, nor whether I think it’s smart or otherwise to get
yourself or your children vaccinated. Of course, being vaccinated with a
product that is safe in and of itself and effective at preventing an
infection that can cause you long-term damage, is a very good thing.
It’s a miracle. There is basically no-one on earth arguing otherwise, I
promise you." Well, that is a false promise, because myself and many
others have exposed the false narrative of the entire vaccine industry
for decades now. Science has never been on the side of the vaccine
peddlers. They have never been proven to be either safe, or effective.
Since I have covered this issue for over a decade now, I am going to
summarize in this article why those of us who have put in the long hours
of research over the many years on just how evil the vaccine industry
is, feel like vomiting or screaming at our computer monitors, every time
someone wants to complain about how bad the COVID-19 shots are but
feels compelled to begin their testimonies with the phrase "I am not an
anti-vaxxer." Well I AM an anti-vaxxer, and I am PROUD to wear that
label, and not ashamed." There is so much more. Read on... Why
I am Proud to Wear the “Anti-Vaxx” Label – History and Science Show
Vaccines Have NEVER Been Safe nor Effective (healthimpactnews.com)
Quote: "Book details Big Pharma control of FDA, CDC, NIH. As
news of the COVID-19 Omicron variant has health officials discussing
new boosters, Robert Kennedy, Jr. revealed the financial motivation
behind the Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and National Institutes of Health promotion of arguably the
most dangerous vaccine in history and their simultaneous suppression of
safe and highly effective treatments for COVID-19, such as ivermectin. The crux is something called “capture,” Kennedy explained in a recent interview with
Fox News’ Tucker Carlson. Capture occurs when a regulating agency
vested with the public trust based on its objective and unbiased
regulation of an industry is taken over by the very interests it is
supposed to be regulating. “I
have been working as an environmental lawyer for 40 years," Kennedy
said. "So, I understand all of these mechanisms of corporate capture by
which the regulated industries assert control over the agencies that are
supposed to regulate them, and essentially turn them into sock
puppets.”
When he began working on vaccine safety issues in 2005, a concern
that has come to the forefront in 2021, Kennedy said he was forcefully
confronted by the problem. “The kind of regulatory capture you see in
[the vaccine] space is really capture on steroids,” Kennedy asserted,
“because these agencies, the FDA gets 45% of its budget from vaccine
companies — from pharmaceutical companies. It’s as if the EPA
[Environmental Protection Agency] got half its budget from the coal
companies.” The results are an ongoing series of violations of the
public interest and often of the law itself. “Probably 20 percent of the
lawsuits of the hundreds of lawsuits I brought as an environmental
lawyer were against the EPA for sweetheart arrangements, for giving
permits to oil companies, etc... that were illegal,” Kennedy recounted.
“And you can imagine how much worse that capture would be if half the
EPA’s budget came from oil and coal. That’s what you are dealing with in
the pharmaceutical space.”
“Not only that, the CDC, which is another of the HHS [Department
of Health and Human Services] subagencies, spends $4.9 of its annual $12
billion budget buying and distributing vaccines. So, it’s really a
vaccine company. It’s not a regulatory agency,” he continued. “That’s
about 40 percent of its budget.” “The
CDC has vaccine patents. So, the vaccines that it’s pushing — it has 57
patents — it is making royalties on. The NIH has thousands of patents,
many of them for vaccines. For example, Tony Fauci’s agency owns half
the Moderna patent and stands to make billions and billions of dollars
on sales of the Moderna vaccine.” Regarding Fauci personally, Kennedy laid out stunning conflicts of interest and possible corruption: "Four
of Fauci’s top aids also have patent rights to Moderna. So, Tony Fauci
can assign patent rights to his favored loyalists within the agency and
they then get to keep $150,000 a year for the rest of their lives on a
product they are supposed to be regulating. Tony Fauci owns patents on
drugs he has developed. So the regulatory function has been essentially
subsumed by the commercial and mercantile aspects of vaccine production,
and vaccine manufacturing and vaccine uptake.” Kennedy
says that even an individual’s professional advancement within the
regulatory agencies is beholden to their new and unauthorized commercial
role. “Within HHS, the way that you get promotions and raises and
salary bonuses, etc., is by contributing to the crusade for vaccine
uptake. You do not get promoted for finding problems with vaccines, and
that’s actually what we as a taxpayer are paying these regulators to do.
But they are not doing it.” Book details Big Pharma control of FDA, CDC, NIH | FreePressers | freepressers.com
No comments:
Post a Comment