The Corrupt Media Did Not Fall For The Russia Collusion Hoax. They Were Part Of It

The corrupt media's attempt to frame their failings as mere confirmation bias holds no truer than the Russia-collusion hoax they peddled for five years.

While Millian had long denied speaking with Danchenko or having any role in the dossier, it was only after Durham charged the Russian-born Danchenko and former Brookings Institute employee with lying about receiving a telephone call from Millian that the Post and other media outlets removed the claims.

Last week, The New York Times ran a "Guest essay" by professor of journalism and former Columbia Journalism School dean Bill Grueskin, headlined, "How Did So Much of the Media Get the Steele Dossier So Wrong?" To Grueskin the problem was multi-pronged.

The corrupt media did not fall for the Russia collusion hoax.

For all corporate media's ex post facto efforts to rationalize why they "Fell" for the dossier, only one holds true: They didn't like Trump, personally or politically.

We are to believe Trump's supposed shady business deals made the dossier plausible to the press, while unworthy of the media's trust were genuine emails discussing a 10 percent cut reserved for the "Big Guy" as part of a Biden family deal being plotted with a Chinese energy giant.

Sure, now the corporate media is expending some effort to report on Hunter Biden's partnership in 2016 with a Chinese state-backed company that gave the communist organization ownership of an African cobalt mine.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/11/22/the-corrupt-media-did-not-fall-for-the-russia-collusion-hoax-they-were-part-of-it/