The Wreck Of The Global Warming Narrative

To start with, how do they explain that three new studies show warming from ​​2001 to 2019 "Was driven by increases in absorbed solar radiation, not human emissions"? Sure, the eco-activists will do what they always do: obfuscate, dodge, change the subject, and call out the "Science deniers."

Just one of those places in a warming world, they say, where it happens to be more frigid than usual.

Apparently we're supposed to forget all that business about the continent, along with the North Pole, being "The 'canary in the coal mine' for detection of global warming."

"As Antarctica holds about 90% of all the ice on the planet, what happens in Antarctica will have major effects on the rest of the world," Discovering Antarctica, a partnership of organizations that includes the United Kingdom's Foreign & Commonwealth Office, said some years ago.

Maybe the record-breaking winter in Antarctica is simply an anomaly on the way to that "Tipping point." But Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has noted that across the world "Temperatures at any given location" are "Almost as likely to be cooling as warming." So while one region is warming, another somewhere is cooling.

The widely accepted, often-used assertion that says 97% of scientists agree that the climate and our earthly environment are in trouble due to warming is a blatant case of misinformation.

The global warming scare is more than three decades old, yet the disaster that's been forecast on a nearly daily basis since the late 1980s has yet to arrive.

https://issuesinsights.com/2021/10/22/the-wreck-of-the-global-warming-narrative/