I've been accused of falsely stating that these COVID shots are not vaccines but gene modifying interventions.
"The German government has specifically outlawed the use of gene therapy-based vaccine as a term," he says.
Wikileaks even went so far as to erase him from the historical section of the mRNA vaccine page and his own personal Wikipedia page was removed.
"My sins were 'profound,'" he says sarcastically, "They were that I outed the chairman of the board of directors of Reuters who is also sitting on the board of Pfizer, for cross-posting the Wall Street Journal article on vaccine toxicity risks, and well, basically for complaining about censorship."
A shorter, separate, online fact sheet with far less information in it is available for patients - but, provider or patient, you still have to know where to look up each of the three EUA vaccines separately on the FDA website to access those fact sheets.
Considering the unknown risks involved, why are governments and vaccine makers pushing so hard for children and pregnant women to participate in this experiment? Both have an extremely low risk for complications from COVID-19, which makes adverse effects of the vaccine all the more unacceptable, if not all together intolerable.
That's a subtle distinction, but what it means is that if you've only accepted one dose of vaccine under those clinical trial protocols and you have an adverse event, and you decide to drop it out, or they gently suggest that you shouldn't take the second dose, that information about the adverse events that you received - which would have made you at even higher risk for the second dose - is lost.
https://ussanews.com/News1/2021/07/31/covid-19-injection-campaign-violates-bioethics-laws/
No comments:
Post a Comment