To determine the accurate results from the 2020 election, states must forensically audit all ballots in an area and not samples.
Representative Steve Carra proposed House Bill 5091, requesting $2.5 million to perform a forensic audit of the November 2020 presidential and US Senate election in the hotly contested state of Michigan.
Much like Arizona's forensic audit, which lawmakers and observers across the nation have praised, Carra's bill would require a bipartisan board to hire an outside group to conduct the forensic audit.
Michigan's proposed audit would use Arizona's audit as a model and cover 10% of the precincts in Michigan's 83 counties, and audit a random sampling of 20% of the precincts in Detroit, where election results are frequently called into question.
In the video above, Jovan Pulitzer begins by sharing that you can't do a partial audit using sampling.
Drop the word FULL from FORENSIC AUDIT and say "Fractional audit" all you get is the same old rigged systems and games.
You have to include 100% of all ballots in your forensic audit.
It's becoming increasingly difficult to discern fact from fiction, and unfortunately the media has a strong bias. They spin stories to make conservatives look bad and will go to great lengths to avoid reporting on the good that comes from conservative policies. There are a few shining lights in the media landscape-brave conservative outlets that report the truth and offer a different perspective. We must support conservative outlets like this one and ensure that our voices are heard.
Elections have consequences, so it is important that voters who want to save our democracy, should v
Wednesday, June 23, 2021
Jovan Pulitzer Clarifies Why You Need Full 100% Forensic Audits to Catch Election Fraud
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment