- The possibility of putting a significant portion of our unemployed back to work and allowing them the dignity of self-support (with a small boost from government policy) is a political good that must be seriously weighed against the benefits of a freer trade environment.
- We must remember that every political question—including about whether a given tariff is justified—involves balancing all the costs and benefits involved, not just the economic ones.
- On the other hand, free trade advocates have repeatedly pointed out the well-established fact that tariffs are economically harmful, thus concluding they should be eschewed.
- On the one hand, we can take for granted that tariffs are always economically harmful—except, of course, that even from an economic perspective they can be beneficial if used as a temporary negotiating tool to get other countries to, say, lower their own tariffs.
- Both sides of the argument, however, share a common flaw: They have almost universally assumed that whether tariffs should be imposed is an economic question.
- Tariffs hurt foreign sellers because they must sell fewer goods at a higher price or cut into their profits to pay the new tax (in practice it will be some of both).
- Foreign policy is just a special case, however, of a more general principle: Tariffs can be justified when they do more good than harm.
- If some tariffs can serve as a form of welfare, replacing transfer payments with jobs, and thus avoiding many of the dependency-related problems that accompany direct aid, they may prove to be a healthy policy solution in an imperfect world.
- Like war, tariffs impose economic costs, but can also be useful—and less drastic—instruments to apply international pressure.
- Hartley’s article, “Just Tariff Theory,” began by acknowledging that tariffs are economically harmful.
- The political goods that a tariff may achieve must be taken into consideration when deciding whether it is justified.
- Tariffs are harmful because they are taxes that burden free trade.
- Consider: Economic models assume that all human beings are fully rational maximizers of their own economic benefit—if a person’s industry is superseded by foreign imports, that person will switch to a different industry and continue to work productively.
- The economic impact of a tariff is a relevant consideration, but so are other, noneconomic goods.
- Thinking in these more political terms nuanced terms is vital if the United States is to adequately pursue its interest and duty in the area of tariff policy.
https://thefederalist.com/2019/06/19/yes-tariffs-make-stuff-expensive-sometimes-worth/
No comments:
Post a Comment