New evidence has come to light leading me to believe, that John Brennan, the former CIA chief, should be closely examined to determine whether he perjured himself when speaking to Congress about his knowledge surrounding the now infamous Steele Dossier.
The problem? Brennan denied knowing anything about the dossier months later in front of Congress, and made those denials under oath and under the promise of the penalty of perjury should he be caught lying again.
Nunes is reportedly also investigating whether Brennan perjured himself.
Other investigative journalists at Tablet Magazine have referred to Brennan's denial as making "No sense" given the known facts about Brennan discussed the details of the dossier across D.C. during the election.
Brennan claimed not to know "Who commissioned" the dossier, not to know whether the FBI "Ever relied" on it as part of "Any court filing," and even claimed the dossier "Wasn't part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had.".
If reports are accurate, why would Brennan lie? If the dossier was such solid material - so much the FBI vouched for it to a FISA court - then why be afraid of admitting knowledge of it?
The question for Brennan is the age-old one in a political scandal: what did Brennan know, and when did Brennan know it? And, where did this story really start?
https://lawandcrime.com/opinion/did-john-brennan-perjure-himself-over-steele-dossier/
The problem? Brennan denied knowing anything about the dossier months later in front of Congress, and made those denials under oath and under the promise of the penalty of perjury should he be caught lying again.
Nunes is reportedly also investigating whether Brennan perjured himself.
Other investigative journalists at Tablet Magazine have referred to Brennan's denial as making "No sense" given the known facts about Brennan discussed the details of the dossier across D.C. during the election.
Brennan claimed not to know "Who commissioned" the dossier, not to know whether the FBI "Ever relied" on it as part of "Any court filing," and even claimed the dossier "Wasn't part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had.".
If reports are accurate, why would Brennan lie? If the dossier was such solid material - so much the FBI vouched for it to a FISA court - then why be afraid of admitting knowledge of it?
The question for Brennan is the age-old one in a political scandal: what did Brennan know, and when did Brennan know it? And, where did this story really start?
https://lawandcrime.com/opinion/did-john-brennan-perjure-himself-over-steele-dossier/
No comments:
Post a Comment