Sunday, January 16, 2022

No, Fauci's Records Aren't Available Online. Why Won't NIH Immediately Release Them?

Last fall, NIH was sued in federal court on the OpenTheBooks' FOIA by the public interest, non-profit Judicial Watch, Washington, D.C. Even with the admission that NIH is holding 1,200 pages of Fauci disclosure information, the agency will only produce 300 pages per month and not even begin to produce documents until February 1st. What else will the public discover about Dr. Fauci with an additional 1,200 pages of disclosure?

Did Fauci's early knowledge of the Covid-19 outbreak influence any of his financial trading? In the few pages NIH did release, auditors note a move by him to partially liquidate his account from early November 2019 to late December 2019.

Yesterday, in a heated exchange with U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, Dr. Fauci testified under oath that his financial documents and conflict of interest disclosures are "Public knowledge" and "All you have to do is ask."

The latest salary available on Dr. Anthony Fauci is from FY2020.

Employment contract: what are the terms of Fauci's employment as director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases and chief medical advisor to President Biden? Is Fauci receiving income from other federal agencies or entities?

Royalties: does Fauci receive royalties? If so, from whom? Since 2005, NIH was supposed to post a database of all scientists receiving royalties on its website.

Transparency advocates are calling on NIH to immediately post online Dr. Fauci's financial and conflict documents - without redactions.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2022/01/12/no-faucis-records-arent-available-online-why-wont-nih-immediately-release-them/amp/?fbclid=IwAR0aJ_eQ2PYhMdeMXpmW57OgGKZfRerE2z9z8gK8yP1bzlshLp3MP3vv3uw 

No comments: