Saturday, October 16, 2021

Things Worth Considering 2

Well, well, well. This former Dominion VP says that the company shares his left wing views. Interesting, don't you think, given that our government has put its faith in their perfectly "Objective Software"... no need to check out its efficacy... Quote: "In a Sept. 23 deposition, Eric Coomer, the former director of security and product strategy for Dominion Voting Systems, said that Dominion shared his extreme leftist beliefs and that he only "screwed up" because he allowed the political right to make him the "perfect villain." Coomer has filed lawsuits against 15 organizations and people, including attorney Sidney Powell and former Tech CEO Joe Oltmann, for defamation in his home state of Colorado. That expensive legal offensive has had the effect of deterring and silencing minority conservative media reporting on the evidence of not only mail-in ballot irregularities but the poorly-understood role of Internet-connected election equipment and software in the tabulation and adjudication of voting data. Coomer claims to have been defamed by journalists who allegedly said he was tied to Antifa, and that he helped rig the 2020 election against President Donald Trump.  He became known to the world courtesy of Oltmann's investigation of Antifa as detailed in his interview with WorldTribune columnist Michele Malkin."    In deposition, former Dominion VP Coomer admitted company shared his leftist views | Trib 247 | trib247.com      This man acts like a typical left winger blaming others for his probable unethical activities.

The evidence continues to mount of massive voter fraud in the 2020 election cycle. This item provides insight into the matter. Quote: " Soon after Donald Trump was elected in 2016, the "tech overlords were plotting how to strike back," journalist Mollie Hemingway noted in her new book. "In one meeting, Google founder Sergey Brin suggested that 'Jigsaw,' a project Google had developed to combat Islamic terror propaganda, could be used to shape the opinions of Trump voters. By the time Trump was inaugurated, a former Google engineer had told Breitbart reporter Allum Bokhari that activists within the company had formed a working group to brainstorm ways to use Google’s resources to undermine the Trump administration," Hemingway writes in "Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections". Facebook and Google were intent on ensuring that Trump would not win again in 2020. Big Tech, Big Media and the Democrat Party formed an alliance that would result in a "rigged" outcome "unlike any election we’d ever had," Hemingway, senior editor at The Federalist, said in a Wednesday interview on "Fox & Friends". "People already knew that the media environment was corrupt," Hemingway said. "They suppressed that Hunter Biden story, which was explosive. They elevated fake news, they knew that Big Tech had manipulated, they did not want to have any information out that helped their political opponents or hurt their political allies and so they censored information and they de-platformed people."
         Hemingway continued: "They also changed a lot of our election laws. Sometimes they did that legally and constitutionally, sometimes they didn’t and Mark Zuckerberg, one of the world’s wealthiest individuals, funded the private takeover of government election offices, and that enabled a bunch of left-wing activists to come into government election offices and actually handle many things, from voter registration to voting to vote counting." “I have no doubt that the same powers that worked to oust President Trump in 2020 will do everything they can to suppress this book in 2021, but I don’t care. The story has to be told,” Hemingway noted Thursday in statement about the book and the circumstances leading up to her decision to write it. “This is the definitive account of the 2020 election. Based on Mollie Hemingway’s exclusive interviews with campaign officials, reporters, Supreme Court justices, and President Trump himself, it exposes the fraud and cynicism behind the Democrats’ historic power-grab,” publisher Regnery said in advance notes for the book. 
        “Rewriting history is a specialty of the radical left, now in control of America’s political and cultural heights. But they will have to contend with the determination, insight, and eloquence of Mollie Hemingway. ‘Rigged’ is a reminder for weary patriots that truth is still the most powerful weapon. The stakes for our democracy have never been higher,” the publisher said."     Hemingway: How Big Tech reshaped virtual reality and helped Left hijack 2020 election | Trib 247 | trib247.com

This is a most interesting opinion piece regarding Supreme Court's unconstitutional establishment of Roe v Wade as the law of the land since the the Democrats could not get their way in congress. Quote:"Supreme Court must return abortion debate to voters and legislatures, says Mississippi brief. The Supreme Court’s precedents on legal abortion are so tangled and misguided that abortion law should be returned to the people and their representatives in the legislatures, backers of a Mississippi ban on abortions after 15 weeks have said. “Finally forced to defend those cases, respondents drive home the stark reality: Roe and Casey are indefensible,” said the Oct. 13 Supreme Court brief filed by Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch and other state officials. “It is true that the judiciary cannot provide a workable half measure—it cannot produce an enduring compromise. But the people can,” the brief continued. “When this court returns this issue to the people, the people can debate, adapt, and find workable solutions. It will be hard for the people too, but under the constitution the task is theirs—and the court should return it to them now.” The brief in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization involves Mississippi’s ban on most elective abortions after 15 weeks. Oral arguments are scheduled for Dec. 1. 

        The challenge could mean the Supreme Court will re-examine its 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion nationwide, as well as its 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey that reaffirmed legal abortion. The respondents’ brief, led by attorneys from the pro-abortion rights group Center for Reproductive Rights, sought to defend the current viability standard, allowing abortion restrictions only after the unborn child may survive outside the womb. The brief said this is 23-24 weeks into pregnancy. The respondents argued that the viability standard serves the court well, has a grounding in the constitution, and has not been challenged by the facts. Defenders of the Mississippi law, they said, do not provide an alternative framework that could sustain a stable right to abortion.

       “Each of the state’s purported alternatives would upend the balance struck in Casey and ultimately extinguish ‘the woman’s liberty to determine whether to carry her pregnancy to full term’,” said the pro-abortion rights brief. Upholding the Mississippi ban would lead to “attempts by half the states in the nation to forbid abortion entirely, and a judiciary left without tools to manage the resulting litigation.” The brief argued that the state should reaffirm precedent, which holds that a state’s interest in protecting fetal life falls short of overriding individual liberty claims.             

       Fitch and other Mississippi leaders faulted this response. “Respondents’ effort to narrow this case—or avoid any decision—shows what they know: that Roe and Casey are deeply flawed and that those flaws have finally been presented to the one tribunal that can do something about them,” said their brief. There is “no constitutional basis” for Roe, Casey, or the viability rule, the brief said. The logic for abortion rights decisions appear selective and unique, rather than part of American constitutional tradition."     Supreme Court must return abortion debate to voters and legislatures, says Mississippi brief (catholicnewsagency.com)   

 

No comments: