Well,
well, well. This former Dominion VP says that the company shares his
left wing views. Interesting, don't you think, given that our government
has put its faith in their perfectly "Objective Software"... no need to
check out its efficacy... Quote: "In
a Sept. 23 deposition, Eric Coomer, the former director of security and
product strategy for Dominion Voting Systems, said that Dominion shared
his extreme leftist beliefs and that he only "screwed up" because he
allowed the political right to make him the "perfect villain." Coomer
has filed lawsuits against 15 organizations and people, including
attorney Sidney Powell and former Tech CEO Joe Oltmann, for defamation
in his home state of Colorado. That
expensive legal offensive has had the effect of deterring and silencing
minority conservative media reporting on the evidence of not only
mail-in ballot irregularities but the poorly-understood role of
Internet-connected election equipment and software in the tabulation and
adjudication of voting data. Coomer
claims to have been defamed by journalists who allegedly said he was
tied to Antifa, and that he helped rig the 2020 election against
President Donald Trump. He became known to the world courtesy of Oltmann's investigation of Antifa as detailed in his interview with WorldTribune columnist Michele Malkin." In deposition, former Dominion VP Coomer admitted company shared his leftist views | Trib 247 | trib247.com This man acts like a typical left winger blaming others for his probable unethical activities.
The
evidence continues to mount of massive voter fraud in the 2020 election
cycle. This item provides insight into the matter. Quote: " Soon
after Donald Trump was elected in 2016, the "tech overlords were
plotting how to strike back," journalist Mollie Hemingway noted in her
new book. "In
one meeting, Google founder Sergey Brin suggested that 'Jigsaw,' a
project Google had developed to combat Islamic terror propaganda, could
be used to shape the opinions of Trump voters. By
the time Trump was inaugurated, a former Google engineer had told
Breitbart reporter Allum Bokhari that activists within the company had
formed a working group to brainstorm ways to use Google’s resources to
undermine the Trump administration," Hemingway writes in "Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections". Facebook
and Google were intent on ensuring that Trump would not win again in
2020. Big Tech, Big Media and the Democrat Party formed an alliance that
would result in a "rigged" outcome "unlike any election we’d ever had,"
Hemingway, senior editor at The Federalist, said in a Wednesday
interview on "Fox & Friends". "People
already knew that the media environment was corrupt," Hemingway said.
"They suppressed that Hunter Biden story, which was explosive. They
elevated fake news, they knew that Big Tech had manipulated, they did
not want to have any information out that helped their political
opponents or hurt their political allies and so they censored
information and they de-platformed people."
Hemingway continued: "They also changed a lot of our election
laws. Sometimes they did that legally and constitutionally, sometimes
they didn’t and Mark Zuckerberg, one of the world’s wealthiest
individuals, funded the private takeover of government election offices,
and that enabled a bunch of left-wing activists to come into government
election offices and actually handle many things, from voter
registration to voting to vote counting." “I
have no doubt that the same powers that worked to oust President Trump
in 2020 will do everything they can to suppress this book in 2021, but I
don’t care. The story has to be told,” Hemingway noted Thursday in
statement about the book and the circumstances leading up to her
decision to write it. “This
is the definitive account of the 2020 election. Based on Mollie
Hemingway’s exclusive interviews with campaign officials, reporters,
Supreme Court justices, and President Trump himself, it exposes the
fraud and cynicism behind the Democrats’ historic power-grab,” publisher
Regnery said in advance notes for the book.
This
is a most interesting opinion piece regarding Supreme Court's
unconstitutional establishment of Roe v Wade as the law of the land
since the the Democrats could not get their way in congress. Quote:"Supreme Court must return abortion debate to voters and legislatures, says Mississippi brief. The
Supreme Court’s precedents on legal abortion are so tangled and
misguided that abortion law should be returned to the people and their
representatives in the legislatures, backers of a Mississippi ban on
abortions after 15 weeks have said. “Finally forced to defend those cases, respondents drive home the stark reality: Roe and Casey are indefensible,” said the Oct. 13 Supreme Court brief filed by Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch and other state officials. “It
is true that the judiciary cannot provide a workable half measure—it
cannot produce an enduring compromise. But the people can,” the brief
continued. “When this court returns this issue to the people, the people
can debate, adapt, and find workable solutions. It will be hard for the
people too, but under the constitution the task is theirs—and the court
should return it to them now.” The
brief in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
involves Mississippi’s ban on most elective abortions after 15 weeks.
Oral arguments are scheduled for Dec. 1.
The challenge could mean the Supreme Court will re-examine its
1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion nationwide, as well
as its 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey that reaffirmed
legal abortion. The respondents’ brief, led by attorneys from the
pro-abortion rights group Center for Reproductive Rights, sought to
defend the current viability standard, allowing abortion restrictions
only after the unborn child may survive outside the womb. The brief said
this is 23-24 weeks into pregnancy. The respondents argued that the
viability standard serves the court well, has a grounding in the
constitution, and has not been challenged by the facts. Defenders of the
Mississippi law, they said, do not provide an alternative framework
that could sustain a stable right to abortion.
“Each of the state’s purported alternatives would upend the
balance struck in Casey and ultimately extinguish ‘the woman’s liberty
to determine whether to carry her pregnancy to full term’,” said the
pro-abortion rights brief. Upholding the Mississippi ban would lead to
“attempts by half the states in the nation to forbid abortion entirely,
and a judiciary left without tools to manage the resulting litigation.”
The brief argued that the state should reaffirm precedent, which holds
that a state’s interest in protecting fetal life falls short of
overriding individual liberty claims.
Fitch and other Mississippi leaders faulted this response.
“Respondents’ effort to narrow this case—or avoid any decision—shows
what they know: that Roe and Casey are deeply flawed and that those
flaws have finally been presented to the one tribunal that can do
something about them,” said their brief. There is “no constitutional
basis” for Roe, Casey, or the viability rule, the brief said. The logic
for abortion rights decisions appear selective and unique, rather than
part of American constitutional tradition." Supreme Court must return abortion debate to voters and legislatures, says Mississippi brief (catholicnewsagency.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment