This item contains a host of
random items selected because of their relevance to the times and
likelihood that little if any attention has been paid to them by the
mainstream media. They are worthy of consideration regardless of
political affiliation and deserve our attention. They illustrate
troubling trends which need to be exposed so that we can consider their
implications and join with others to seek solutions within our spheres
of influence as well as when considering who gets our vote at election
times. The founders warned us that an engaged citizenry is required to
sustain the Republic. Unfortunately engagement is not a part of far too
many of today's citizenry. Apathy and ignorance is, on the other hand,
prevalent. I do not expect you to engage all items but please read the
headers to determine which might be of interest. I especially recommend
you read and think about the first six items. And please be one of
those who take action. Thanks,
Quote: "Over the last 90 years
or so, the United States has transformed into the very thing the
founding generation fought to destroy. We learn in elementary history
classes that American revolutionaries rejected the notion of a king. But
it went beyond that. The founding generation also sought to eradicate
the concept of a powerful magistrate who ruled over the people and was
empowered to make law. As the Americans split with Great Britain and
forged ahead forming new governments, they were ever-fearful of vesting
power in individuals detached and unaccountable from the will of the
people." http://constitutionalrightspac.com/articles/america-has-become-what-the-founders-sought-to-destroy
Black pastors are fed up with
Obama and his characterizations relative to civil rights. Quote:
Coalition of African American Pastors’ member William Owens "...went on
to criticize
Obama even further for the perceived slight, calling him a “disgrace to
the black community” and asserting that he is “rewriting history” by
including gay rights in a discussion of the 1965 civil rights march." http://www.westernjournalism.com/obamas-shocking-comparison-black-pastors-calling-disgrace/? This is at least a partial indication that most Americans agree with these black pastors. http://www.fixthisnation.com/conservative-breaking-news/new-poll-obama-worst-president-since-world-war-ii/
This is an instructive bit of
history. Quote: "Half a century ago, Democrats looked at the country
and realized they were never going to convince Americans to agree with
them. But they noticed that people in most other countries of the world
already agreed with them. The solution was obvious. So in 1965 -- 50
years ago this week -- Sen. Ted Kennedy passed an immigration law that
has brought 59 million foreigners to our shores, who happen to vote 8-2
for the Democrats." And, "This isn't a guess; it's a provable fact.
Obama beat Romney by less than 5 million votes in a presidential
election in which about 125 million votes were cast. More than 30
million of Obama's votes came from people who arrived under Teddy
Kennedy's immigration law; fewer than 10 million of Romney's did." http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2015/09/30/the-war-on-america-turns-50-n2059403?
Why do you think Obama has amped up the process Ted Kennedy started by
actively recruiting illegal immigrants from Central and South America
the majority of which draw American taxpayer benefits and now he
is bringing in un-vetted refugees from the Middle East by the thousands
(which is stated to be humanitarian to save families but the majority
are young men and boys)? The answer to the question is that he intends
his legacy to be that he either sealed the deal for Democrats for the
next 100 years or he assured the death of the nation the founders
bequeathed us. Do you still think what our government is doing is good
for our country. I remind you that none of the more than 30 Muslim
countries have made efforts to help their Muslim brothers and sisters.
Ask yourself why. http://fromtheright.com/latest/you-wont-believe-how-many-muslim-refugees-obama-will-let-into-america/
Muslims use Alinsky tactics to try and subvert the citizens of Tennessee efforts to deny teaching of Islam in public schools. http://eaglerising.com/25171/in-tennessee-muslims-use-alinsky-tactics-to-stop-parents-from-outlawing-islamic-indoctrination-in-public-schools/
By the way, Hillary's senior paper in college was about Alinsky and
Obama used Alinsky tactics as a community organizer in Chicago and
according to reports taught Alinsky tactics during his time as a law
school instructor. People with common interests use the same sources
for their devious operations. For those who do not know about Saul
Alinsky, he was a socialistic agitator who wrote the book "Rules for
Radicals". It is a book that teaches and glorifies disruptive tactics
and agitation techniques for those who want to bring about socialistic
change. Does that seem familiar?
This is an example of how
screwed up the concept of political correctness is and the idiotic and
unconscionable outcomes it produces. Quote: "Despite pressure from
alumni, bad publicity, and, you know, common human decency, Boston
University appears ready to stand behind their new hire, an anti-white
racist named Saida Grundy. Grundy, hired to teach sociology and
African-American studies, was exposed as a racist through her Twitter
account. In recent weeks, she has tweeted such bizarre sentiments as her
belief that “white masculinity is THE problem for america’s colleges.”
She has also called white men a “problem population,” and she has said
that she tries to avoid shopping at white-owned businesses whenever
possible." And, "Of course, the mere fact that there is a subject
called African-American studies in the first place is evidence that
things are askew in the world of academia. Who is teaching Boston
University’s White Americans class? Oh, they don’t offer that class? Why
not? Oh, it would be racist? Interesting, interesting… In academic
circles, the definition of racism has been modified to mean “prejudice +
power,” thus taking minorities off the hook. Only white Americans can
be racist under this framework, and this idiotic definition has escaped
feminist classrooms to be fully embraced by the left. It’s why they can
look at someone like Grundy, make a show of “condemning” her comments,
and then move on. As far as they’re concerned, unless you happen to have
white skin, the worst you can be guilty of is poor professional
judgment. One would think that alone would be enough to make Boston
University rethink their decision, but this is a brave new age. If they
fired Grundy, they would probably be accused of racism themselves. As
absurd as it seems, they are probably making the right choice
politically." http://www.fixthisnation.com/conservative-breaking-news/boston-university-stands-behind-racist-professor/
Because Boston University yields to the idiotic and culturally
destructive notion of political correctness it has received its last
contribution from me, not because I am one of those white men the
professor so hates, but because this university, along with so many
others, has forsaken its institutional integrity.
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment