Sunday, October 27, 2019

The Odd Unseriousness Of 'Serious' Journalism

These people have votes in Congress or millions of people who believe what they say, no matter how absurd, wrong, or biased they may be.

"For more than two years, President Trump has repeatedly attacked the Russia investigation, portraying it as a hoax and illegal even months after the special counsel closed it," the Times story opens, as if a closed investigation could not be a hoax or how the whole thing came into being should not even be wondered about because it was over.

"Likely to raise alarms" with who? Why? Who, after the promises made that were exposed as lies by the Mueller probe, wouldn't want to know how it happened, if only to avoid it happening again?

The fact of the matter is these self-appointed arbiters of truth have no interest in knowing how this fraud began.

Mitchell then brought on two guests, both former Obama administration officials who proceeded to dismiss the idea as a "Debunked conspiracy theory" and lamented how those being questioned would have to hire lawyers because it will cost them money.

There are millions of Americans who will believe any and everything someone like Andrea Mitchell, Chuck Todd, or Jim Acosta say, no matter how corrupt, self-serving, divorced from reality, or anti-journalistic it is.

Derek is the host of a free daily podcast and author of the book, Outrage, INC., which exposes how liberals use fear and hatred to manipulate the masses.

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2019/10/27/the-odd-unseriousness-of-serious-journalism-n2555390

No comments: