Friday, December 23, 2016

More About Fake News 2

This man has been liar in chief ever since he entered office.  That certainly qualifies as promoting fake news.  Yet, he ignores all the traffic from the left that has been proven false because the left sees themselves right even when wrong but anyone who disagrees with them is always wrong even when right.
This outlines a Republicans plan to balance the left wing dominated media.    

You will find this interesting.   This is just one example of why I am not a Democrat.

Seventy seven percent of the mainstream media news reporting during the presidential campaign was negative when dealing with Trump.  It is a fact they were supporting Hillary despite all the negative revelations that should have tanked her campaign if their reporting of her had not been fake news.

We will have to wait and see if this is true, but I suspect it is pretty close to right. Quote: "A Wikileaks envoy today claims he personally received Clinton campaign emails in Washington D.C. after they were leaked by ‘disgusted’ whisteblowers – and not hacked by Russia.  Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.  ‘Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,’ said Murray in an interview with on Tuesday. ‘The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.’  His account contradicts directly the version of how thousands of Democratic emails were published before the election being advanced by U.S. intelligence."

Quote: "Speaking of fake news, the latest issue of the National Enquirer at the supermarket checkout is giving the mainstream presstitute media a run for the money: “Castro’s Deathbed Confession: I Killed JFK. How I framed Oswald.”   That’s almost as good as the fake news going around the presstitute media, such as the TV stations, the Washington Post, New York Times, and Guardian – yes, even the former leftwing British newspaper has joined the ranks of the press prostitutes – that the CIA has concluded that “Russian operatives covertly interfered in the election campaign in an attempt to ensure the Republican candidate’s victory.”

Chuck Todd got put in his place by president-elect Trump's chief of staff  Reince Priebus.  Todd was pushing fake news without a specific source for saying the RNC was hacked by Russians.  As head of the RNC Reince Priebus told him that they WERE NOT hacked.  Nonetheless Todd persisted with his fake news mantra.

Chris Hayes played the do not impugn the Islamic faith card in this piece.  Fake News is running rampant.

This idea that Russia somehow influenced the outcome of the November election is a bit far fetched. This piece discusses that topic.    And, the FBI challenges the CIA claim that Russia was in any way involved.

The New York Times has been reduced to a scandalous rag. 

Though a bit of a parody, it contains much truth about the corrupt nature of a broad swath of the mainstream news media.  I hope people take to heart his closing remarks regarding the current state of journalism and make it happen.  I quote him:  "I write for the people who can envision WHAT COULD BE and will at least consider making their stand there.  Like many other people, I know what cynicism, despair, and passivity are. I’ve visited that land. I’ve checked into those motels. But in the end, they’re a joke. You know why? Because: what do they get you? They get you nothing. Zero.  At best, they get you the temporary hope that someone else will rescue you and drag you from the depths.  One thing that’s going to happen as independent news takes over from the old goofs: there will be information, more information about workable solutions to vital problems. People need to be ready for that.  They need to be ready for answers that are shocking because they ARE answers. It’ll seem surreal. Workable answers? What??  Yes. People will need to adjust their minds.  The business of news outlets without solutions will be eclipsed.  If you think this is impossible, then become a citizen journalist, and make it possible. No one of good will and intelligence needs to be on the outside looking in."

So sad how far the left leaning media has fallen.   

No wonder no media outlet wants to have anything to do with this unhinged liberal.  

Anyone who is paying attention is well aware of how notorious of a liar this person is.    Why and how people on the left can adore her so is beyond me.  She is a walking library of fake news.

Would it be fair to say that the Washington Post has engaged in producing fake news?

The Democrats have been pulling out all stops to take away Trump's election victory.  Thus far everything has failed.

Much has been said about the leftwing controlled media's biased news coverage throughout the recent election cycle.  This item suggests that even NY Times' liberal clientele were not happy with their coverage.   Given their long commitment to leftist policies and personalities do not expect much if any change.  More fake news will emanate from leftist media.
This is Ron Paul's take on Fake News.

See what media journalist Chris Cuomo is up to.

Barbara Walters says ABC has destroyed the legacy of the TV show "The View".   It's unqualified hosts and obvious liberal bias combine to put it in the fake news camp.

The mainstream media is not dead as this item claims but it is indeed dying for reasons cited and more.

This is a sad commentary on the antics of disaffected Hillary supporters, and the mainstream media hawkers.  Quote: "If it weren’t for the Electoral College, New York City and Los Angeles would determine every national election outcome. There would be practically no point in Middle America even voting. Talk about voter suppression."  And, talk about fake news.

Michael Moore is a well known radical leftist.  He is now joining hands with the anti-Trump rioters and promoting violence in the name of leftist politics.  Is not promoting violence against the law???  Or, is that now permissible with the fake news crowd?    What happened to the Democrats' past support for having a peaceful transition of administrations?  It was front and center in their rhetoric while they thought Hillary was going to win.   They are well established hypocrites.

George Burns

No comments: