Sunday, October 25, 2015

More Random Thoughts 2

This piece provides good insight into the UN and its efforts to sit atop a global New World Order.  The UN is not alone in its efforts nation states such as the US, Canada, Germany, etc. are in league with the initiative.  http://batr.org/autonomy/092215.html 

This item discusses the downside of US membership in the UN.  An instructive piece.  Quote: "A realistic assessment of the U.N.’s actual conduct teaches us not to be beguiled by the idealism propounded by its supporters. We should reconsider our country’s commitment to this problematical institution."     http://humanevents.com/2015/10/23/the-united-nations-at-70-should-the-united-states-drop-out/?

The UN continues its power grab.  It is highly unlikely that the Senate knows of this UN initiative just as in the above item.  And, my guess is that Obama could not care less.   Those interested in psychiatry and psychology will be especially intrigued.  But, I hasten to add it should concern us all.  Quote: "The mandatory imposition of the World Health Organization's classification of diseases (ICD-10th revision) upon the practice of medicine and all allied professions including psychology on October 1, 2015 is a major step in the radical transformation of the United States into a subjugated territory of a one-world regime under the auspices of the United Nations."   http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/10/icd10_the_un_occupies_medicine.html

You need to read this item if you still don't think the UN is a power hungry tyrannical monster AND is collaborating against the interests of the US and other free nations.  Quote: "


  • 288
     
    EmaShare

Negotiators at the UN climate talks in Bonn, Germany resurrected the “International Tribunal of Climate Justice” and inserted it into the text they are preparing for nations to agree to at the big UN summit in Paris in December.
  • Over 130 developing nations led by South Africa and instigated by China and India are insisting that they will not sign a climate agreement in Paris unless it contains massive redistribution of wealth from developed to poor nations.  Now they want the power to haul the U.S. and its allies before a UN Star Chamber to enforce compliance. 
The draft text will allow developing nations to sit in judgment over the U.S. and its allies, but not subject those nations to the tribunal’s jurisdiction themselves."   http://www.cfact.org/2015/10/23/un-climate-text-adds-an-international-tribunal-of-climate-justice/?

All along this is what the whole immigration game Obama has been playing is all about.  He, of course, has the full support of  Democrats.  It is as dirty and unethical as you know what.  It is all about Democratic party control of our government.  The will of the people does not matter.  Progressive leftist/Democrat control over the population does.   http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/18/us/white-house-campaign-legal-immigrants-citizenship.html?   Somehow the whole process of handling the Middle Eastern refugee mess (which the UN has failed miserably in handling in the first place) fell to the UN.  They are telling free nations what number of immigrations/refugees each will be required to absorb.  Since when did they acquire that authority?  Ask yourself why Muslim nations get a free ride or have refused to accept any.  One more time I will say the UN is not a friend of our Republic.

UN indoctrination supporting their goal to establish a One World Government has long been underway.  Our compliant government has played along.  Two quotes: "This is a part of a huge propaganda campaign designed to make UN Agenda 21 cool and hip, and unassailable." And, "Popular culture is supporting UN Agenda 21 through all media, through schools, through all levels of bureaucracy, and peer pressure. Transformation is the term you’ll hear, ‘change’, and it can only happen by destroying the existing order.  Young people are the most vulnerable; they’ve been fed this line all of their lives and see themselves as the saviors of the poor and downtrodden.  The salvation is packaged as Sustainable Development / Agenda 21."      http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/the-young-global-citizen-and-un-agenda-21/  

While not UN related.  It does illustrate how governments and their crony businessmen control things.  This so called treaty has been railed against by members of both political parties.  Past performance of these type deals have resulted is the loss of US jobs.  Big businesses win the people lose.  To get a sense of how problematic this treaty is read just one quote.  Quote: "The IP Chapter of the TPP has perhaps been the most controversial chapter due to its wide-ranging effects on internet services, medicines, publishers, civil liberties and biological patents. “If TPP is ratified, people in the Pacific-Rim countries would have to live by the rules in this leaked text,” said Peter Maybarduk, Public Citizen’s Global Access to Medicines Program Director. “The new monopoly rights for big pharmaceutical firms would compromise access to medicines in TPP countries. The TPP would cost lives.”   https://wikileaks.org/tpp-ip3/

This helps to emphasize the oppressive controls the UN wishes to impose on a global basis.  Quote: Regarding climate science "... a sizable percentage of the population that consists of both scientists and laymen disagree with popular opinion, then it can hardly be called a settled science. This situation calls for more research and debate until the truth, whatever it may be, becomes indisputable and everyone can get on board with that reality. You know what it doesn’t call for? Persecuting and prosecuting the minority that has dared to disagree with popular opinion.  And that’s exactly what a secretive UN funded legal conference decided to do last month, when they met to discuss climate change and how the International Court of Justice should tackle it."  This is scarry.  Note this, too. What is "... interesting about this whole situation, is that I [author of the article] don’t remember hearing about anyone calling for pro-global warming opinions to be made illegal (as a matter of fact, if you can find a single instance of this happening, post it in the comments.) This type of behavior seems to stem exclusively from the other side of the aisle, and it doesn’t do their argument any favors. If this is how top global warming proponents approach science and debate, then it’s hard to imagine anyone taking their assertions seriously in the future."   http://www.thedailysheeple.com/secretive-un-legal-conference-wants-to-outlaw-climate-change-denial_102015?

George Burns 

No comments: