Monday, August 17, 2015

The Clinton's Nefarious Relationships and Questionable Actions Keep Getting Exposed

Some may scoff at a some of the items covered in this email. Do so at your own risk...the credibility of the evidence documenting her misdeeds is rising with each passing day.  Even news operations historically rendering her support by routinely giving her the benefit of doubts not given others are now questioning her veracity/honesty. Check out the sources reporting the items, many of which are left leaning liberal enterprises and long time supporters of the Clintons.  Hillary is running for president all the while she, Bill and her team are desperately trying to downplay a long history of unsavory activities. Those unsavory acts continue.  Electing a president is serious business and we need to know all we can about any candidate. The more we learn about her the less credible she becomes.  This item in this note just scratch the surface.  If true, and increasingly it seems many if not all of them are, she should not even be running for the presidency, much less receive our support. As always I understand time is not available to read all items.  However, I urge you to select at least a few of those that strike your interest.  The first 6 items are recommended..

This is an example of Hillary's "personal quid pro quo" activities while serving as Secretary of  State.  Quote: "The International Business Times report raises more questions about whether foreigners were buying influence with Clinton by donating to the Clinton Foundation.  According to the report, Clinton, who had opposed the U.S.-Colombia trade pact when she was running for president in 2008, was silent when workers at Pacific Rubiales, the oil company in question in Colombia, went on strike in 2011 and “the Colombian military rounded them up at gunpoint and threatened violence if they failed to disband.” Human rights activists had urged Clinton to oppose the free trade deal with Colombia because such tactics were commonplace in the nation."     http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/09/report-hillary-supported-trade-deal-after-oil-magnate-pledged-100-million-to-family-foundation/    The problem is that this behavior on her part did not start while serving as Secretary of State.  She was at it while serving as a Senator.   http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/10/hillary-clintons-favors-to-foundation-donors-stret/  And it is still going on.  Compare her behavior with one who preceded her in giving a speech.   http://www.redstate.com/2015/06/21/hillary-clinton-self-aggrandizing-grifter/  and here  http://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-if-every-american-saw-this-3-minute-video-hillary-clinton-wouldnt-stand-a-chance/?

A little comic relief.  Check out this piece on the Clinton's charitable donations.  It tells the true story of their lack of ethics and total absence of any moral principles.  It is a short quick to the point piece but tells a huge story. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/08/hillary_clintons_tax_returns_the_most_hilarious_chart.html    And what about the hypocrisy.  Not so funny.  http://teapartybulletin.com/surprise-hillary-blames-you-for-this-but-is-worse-herself/   This reflects their ethics.  Do as I say, not as I do.   http://www.responseaction.com/Article/bill-and-hillary-try-cheat-death-tax   Just more hypocrisy.  The woman is unbelievably egotistical.  She thinks she is above the law.  Violating government/State Department procedures, much less the law, is apparently of no consequence to her.   http://patriotupdate.com/entitled-hillary-americans-dont-care-about-my-classified-emails/    

And, this should give anyone reason to distrust anything, and I mean anything, Hillary and her loyal entourage have to say or do.  They are defying court orders, thumbing their noses at judges.  If you or I did this we would be arrested and held in contempt.  Hillary does not deserve her status as Democrat front runner for the office of president.  She is just as lawless as Obama.  Reports are that as of yesterday that so far there were 60 classified emails found in Hillary's email system.  People have gone to jail for less than that.   http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/aug/16/number-of-hillary-clintons-emails-flagged-for-clas/     Now read this. http://townhall.com/columnists/richgalen/2015/08/17/the-latest-on-hillarys-emails-n2039545/page/full    Here's more.   http://observer.com/2015/08/breaking-cheryl-mills-to-destroy-emails-about-hillary-clinton/    Does this seem suspicious to you?   http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/08/13/no-really-hillary-wanted-a-book-about-how-to-delete-emails-n2038590  
 
This should also make you very, very leery of Hillary Clinton.  People who know her and have worked with her in the past are starting to spill the beans.  They clearly think she would be bad for us as president.  Here is one example - there are others. http://teapartyupdate.com/bombshell-revelation-from-white-house-insider-could-cripple-clinton-for-good/  

Her lies and deceptive behavior continue unabated.    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/records-show-clinton-withheld-emails-about-oil-terrorism/article/2567169   Check out this piece which details five of her lies.  She and her team claim that Congressional Committee investigations are a witch hunt. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-email-answers-dont-answer-key-question/article/2568520  and here is a follow-up to that item.  The Wall Street Journal is now reporting that she lied and may even have committed a crime.  http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2015/07/24/wsj-despite-denials-hillary-did-send-classified-material-through-private-server-n2029971?  and two separate Inspector Generals have requested the Department of Justice launch a criminal investigation.  Quote: "Two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into whether Hillary Rodham Clinton mishandled sensitive government information on a private email account she used as secretary of state, senior government officials said Thursday." http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2015/07/24/oh-my-inspectors-general-request-criminal-probe-into-hillarys-email-use-n2029721?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad     and  http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2015/07/02/five-lies-about-hillarys-secret-emails-n2020062?  How many more blatant lies will be tolerated by the public?   http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/hillary-email-subpoena-released_987095.html    Even the media is getting frustrated with her irresponsible behavior and lies.   http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2015/07/09/msm-yeah-hillary-seems-to-have-lied-a-lot-in-that-cnn-interview-n2023331?  The e-mail scandal is expanding.  Proof is offered that she transmitted classified information to at least 5 different intelligence agencies.  It is to the point where one cannot believe anything she says.   http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2015/07/31/report-hillary-emails-contained-classified-materials-from-five-us-intelligence-agencies-n2032699?   And, http://spectator.org/articles/63637/hillary%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%98progressive%E2%80%99-demise 
Making as much money as possible seems to be a theme with the Clintons.  While serving as Secretary of State Hillary was most generous in approving arms sales to dubious characters who made huge contributions to the Clinton Foundation. Quote: "The ethical questions surrounding foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation have entered a new arena: arms sales. According to the International Business Times, governments with appalling human rights records who donated to the Clinton Foundation received billions in arms deals approved by the Clinton State Department that far surpassed anything doled out by the Bush administration."   http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/05/26/clintons-state-department-approved-weapons-deals-to-governments-who-made-donations-to-their-foundation-n2003917   And get this. Quote: "As the money flowed to the foundation from Sweden, Mrs. Clinton’s team in Washington declined to blacklist any Swedish firms despite warnings from career officials at the U.S. Embassy in Stockholm that Sweden was growing its economic ties with Iran and potentially undercutting Western efforts to end Tehran’s rogue nuclear program, diplomatic cables show.  This looks exactly like a shakedown racket. And it was not the foundation alone that profited enormously."
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/06/clinton_foundation_setup_fundraising_arm_in_sweden_as_iran_sanctions_deliberated_at_hillarys_state_department.html   One more item about the potential violation of law committed by the then Secretary of State.   This one highlights her total hypocrisy as she grubs for money.  http://www.westernjournalism.com/hypocritical-hillary-clinton-accepted-nearly-10-million-from-church-that-condemns-homosexuality/?   Then there's the African leader who gave between $1 and 5 million to her foundation after which as Secretary of State she ignored the terrorism taking place in his country.  http://americanspotlight.com/news/hillary-ignored-african-terrorists-after-her-foundation-got-million-dollar-donations-from-this-man/

This graphic tells the story.   http://conservativesunited.com/one-simple-comparison-says-all-you-need-to-know-about-hillary-clinton/  But here is a more detailed accounting of her past war on women from someone who personally experienced it.  Quote:  "But it's not Bubba from whom she seeks vengeance, retribution and further accountability. She's after Hillary for what she calls, with considerable evidence, her complicity in her husband's sexual abuses and scandals.  "She is the war on women, as far as I am concerned," the widow Willey says, "... she's made it a point to find out ... every woman ... who's crossed his path over the years. She's orchestrated a terror campaign against every one of these women, including me."   http://townhall.com/columnists/suzannefields/2015/07/31/hillarys-unsavory-past-returns--with-sharp-new-teeth-n2032596/page/full   To add to the story read this.   http://www.citizen-action.com/bill-clintons-affairs-jeopardize-marriage/article1520?  

This adds to that above.  Quote: "Why then did all these foreign individuals and entities (not governments) make their contributions to an American charity? I do not know all the applicable tax laws from their nations so it is possible there were some local tax benefits. But that is highly unlikely. We are focusing on the many six- or seven- figure donations. A cynic would jump to conclusions that the quid pro quos outlined by Schweizer were the real motivation. You can draw your own conclusion.  As I wrote before, this entire matter is tawdry and it is certainly possible there are some illegalities. Whether the mainstream press will devote the resources to obtain a smoking gun and someone comes clean is still up for grabs. Schweizer has done a great service. Even if nothing goes further from his research, my question is why would Americans want four or possibly eight more years of this circus?"   http://townhall.com/columnists/brucebialosky/2015/07/12/clintons-questionable-benevolence-n2023365/page/full

It is without question that the media has been working for Hillary for a very long time.  Ethics and journalistic standards are absent when dealing with media favorites.  Someone at Meet the Press fed her the questions she would be asked in advance of an interview with them.  http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/08/01/emails-reveal-hillary-clinton-fed-meet-the-press-questions-in-advance/

This should disturb you.  Evidence exists that President Obama and Hillary colluded in developing the lie that the Benghazi attack that resulted in four American deaths was ignited by a video on the internet.  Quote: "President Obama and Hillary Clinton likely made the decision to falsely tie an inflammatory anti-Islam Internet video to the fatal Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack that left four Americans dead in Benghazi, Libya, the chief of the conservative government watchdog group Judicial Watch (JW) told Breitbart News.  The president and then-Secretary of State Clinton sought the assistance from domestic and foreign jihadists in spreading the online video lie, added JW President Tom Fitton."   http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/07/03/judicial-watch-obama-and-hillary-clinton-concocted-benghazi-video-lie-with-jihadist-help/

This item provides a synopsis of the scandals that will plague Hillary all through her campaign for the presidency.  We all have to determine if her obvious ethical lapses, propensity to lie, and flaunting of the law are sufficient to merit a NO vote in either the Democratic primary or the national election.  In my mind we should collectively keep her and Bill as far away from the White House as we can.  Regarding Hillary the item notes that "She has to be the gold standard for flawed candidacies." http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/05/30/there-are-flawed-candidates-and-then-theres-hillary-clinton-n2005732?   This is another example...she has her hatchet people clean up any records that might reflect poorly on her job performance as Secretary of State.   http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2565827

This item reminds us of the failures populating her work history which alone should be enough to disqualify her for the presidency of the United States.   http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2015/06/23/hillary-and-history-n2015842/page/full   But here is one more reason she should never be president.  She is a big, I mean really big, and long time supporter of Monsanto, Dow and other GMO industrial giants.  This item provides the details. http://www.naturalnews.com/050214_Hillary_Clinton_Monsanto_biotech_industry.html
This hard left New York Times piece does not bode well for the Clintons.  Where there is smoke there is fire.  Quote: "But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one." http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html  This item extends the New York Times piece. http://townhall.com/columnists/lindachavez/2015/04/26/clinton-greededitors-note-debra-j-saunders-is-off-the-following-column-is-by-linda-chavez-n1990126/page/full

The whole Benghazi thing gets more and more curious with the passage of time.  It now seems to have some degree of bipartisan involvement.   http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/the-benghazi-bonanza-a-bi-partisan-scandal/?   More emails uncovered.  Hillary's problems continue to mount.   http://dailysignal.com/2015/06/23/more-hillary-clinton-benghazi-emails-revealed/?

This item provides insight into who Hillary really is.  Do not believe all you hear her say.  Her positions and statements over the year are so convoluted that it is impossible to decipher.  One thing, for sure, is what she says is convenient for the moment she says it and yes what she says can change again when convenient to do so.   http://liberty247.net/hillary-clintons-racist-hero/   And, my guess is that you will find these quotes she has made over the years to be quite informative of who the real Hillary is.   http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2015/06/16/draft-n2012995?  

Trustworthy?  Can you can believe what she says?  I don't think so.  Here is an example.   http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/15/politics/45-times-secretary-clinton-pushed-the-trade-bill-she-now-opposes/index.html   This item shows that there really was a plot to deny congressional access to the full range of relevant emails on Hillary's illegal private email system used while serving as Secretary of State.   http://hotair.com/archives/2015/06/16/nyt-blumenthal-documents-show-state-or-hillary-held-back-e-mails-from-congress/?

Another non-disclosure emerges.  This time from Bill.   http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/05/26/ap-the-clintons-have-a-secret-company-that-wasnt-disclosed-until-now-n2004062?   Here us another example of their hi-jinxs. http://www.redstate.com/2015/05/26/the-beginning-of-a-new-trail-for-reporters/   The Clinton's are secretive, unethical and possibly criminal money grubbers.  How's this for ethics.  http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/243414-bill-clinton-reportedly-appeared-at-event-only-after-donation 

Even the editorial boards of such newspapers as the New York Times are after the Clintons for what seems to be illegal cash for access/benefit with foreign officials/nations.  http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/04/24/nyt-wsj-editorial-boards-hit-clinton-over-foundation-dealings-n1990116?    And read this.  Quote: "Shocking revelations show that at least four Clinton Foundation board of directors have either been charged or convicted of financial crimes, including bribery and fraud."  http://patriotupdate.com/2015/05/revealed-four-clinton-foundation-trustees-charged-or-convicted-of-financial-crimes/   George Stephanopoulos gave the Clinton Foundation $75,000 over three years and served as a Clinton apologist at ABC ever since he was hired.  Even donated his time in other ways.  Yet, he acted as if was "independent" journalist and when he savaged "Clinton Cash" author Peter Schweizer on his ABC Sunday show on April 30, claiming there was "no evidence" that the Clintons had done anything wrong, that he was funding the foundation they were discussing. But he refused to disclose it.  I long ago dismissed him as a political hack.  You should, too.   http://townhall.com/columnists/brentbozell/2015/05/20/shameless-stephanopoulos-shameless-abc-n2001266/page/full  Dishonesty surrounds both the Clinton's and those with whom they associate.  The world's second most richest man and the top share holder of The New York Times.  Quote: "Not only has Slim contributed between $1,000,001 and $5,000,000 to the Clinton Foundation, but his company Telmex has contributed an additional grant between $1,000,001 and $5,000,000 through its foundation. Slim has also pledged $100 million to the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative, a collaboration between the Clinton Foundation and Canadian mining tycoon Frank Giustra."  Slim's business activities have been sleazy at best.  http://freebeacon.com/politics/new-york-times-top-shareholder-is-a-clinton-foundation-donor/

After reading this you will realize that Hillary does not have an honest bone in her body.  http://nypost.com/2015/05/19/hillary-clinton-had-a-second-secret-e-mail-address/?   The more we learn about this lady the more we understand that she is not to be trusted to do anything in the interests of the American people.  She is all in for herself.   http://www.redstate.com/2015/05/19/hillary-clinton-know-benghazi-attack-advance/  and this is just as bad.   http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2015/05/19/uh-oh-hillary-used-private-email-address-her-lawyers-claimed-didnt-exist-n2000710?  And it continues as we learn of more and more of their associations with really bad actors.   http://www.westernjournalism.com/busted-a-clinton-cash-connection-with-someone-who-tortures-dissidents-just-exposed/?  

And you might want to read how her destruction of emails may come back to bite her.   http://cfif.org/v/index.php/commentary/54-state-of-affairs/2607-spoliation-of-evidence-standard-and-hillarys-qno-smoking-gunq-alibi

This item is direct, succinct and hard hitting and as far as I can determine right on all points.   http://eaglerising.com/17807/the-left-pretend-to-want-facts-but-only-their-facts/  Here is another one. http://patriotupdate.com/articles/hillarys-foreign-donations-is-she-naive-entitled-or-just-crooked/

George Burns



Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)