So whose job is it, exactly, to stem the tide of illegal entries into
a state? Someone sneaking across the Rio Grande from Mexico is entering
both the state of Texas and the United States of America, but if the
authorities take notice of his presence here, the federal government
will claim jurisdiction, preempting, for the most part, anything Texas
might have to say about the nature of the hospitality extended to the
unauthorized visitor
The problem is that the federal government seems insufficiently interested in preventing illegal immigration. This is what finds us in the second decade of the twenty-first century with between seven and twenty million illegals among us. If that seems an absurdly broad range, consider that illegals do not exactly raise their hands for the census. You therefore get those who don’t consider illegal immigration a pressing problem citing the lower figure, while more concerned voices cite the higher. If we split the difference at about fourteen million, that’s between 4 and 5 percent of all the human beings in the United States.
http://spectator.org/articles/60080/what-texas-has-tell-us-about-how-immigration-will-play-out-2016
The problem is that the federal government seems insufficiently interested in preventing illegal immigration. This is what finds us in the second decade of the twenty-first century with between seven and twenty million illegals among us. If that seems an absurdly broad range, consider that illegals do not exactly raise their hands for the census. You therefore get those who don’t consider illegal immigration a pressing problem citing the lower figure, while more concerned voices cite the higher. If we split the difference at about fourteen million, that’s between 4 and 5 percent of all the human beings in the United States.
http://spectator.org/articles/60080/what-texas-has-tell-us-about-how-immigration-will-play-out-2016
No comments:
Post a Comment