Observations of a practicing physician.   http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/06/22/healthcare-va-obamacare-health-premiums-insurance-column/11240979/  In case you don't already know, it has now been established that VA ineptitude/irresponsible official actions resulted in the deaths of at least 1000 veteran deaths.  Now is that what you want our entire government controlled healthcare system to be?   http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2014/06/24/however-bad-you-think-the-va-scandal-is-its-worse-much-worse/   "Fixing" Obamacare is not the solution.  Getting rid of it is.
 
The administration will likely say "What difference does it now make"?    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/06/hundreds_of_thousands_may_lose_obamacare_coverage.html


Now I ask you does this make an ounce of sense?  Unbelievable the amount of money Obamacare adds to the nation's rapidly expanding debt.  Does anybody still believe this progressive/liberal driven monstrosity is good for average Americans and long term welfare of the nation?  http://www.naturalnews.com/045700_Obamacare_subsidies_healthcare_system_debt_spending.html   


Obamacare still looks like a pig even though the media is smearing huge amounts of lipstick on it.   http://spectator.org/articles/59727/media-smears-more-lipstick-obamacare


Obamacare forces insurance companies to narrow the size of medical networks for consumers.  http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/06/obamacare-mandates-will-force-insured-narrowed-networks/

The agency that kills rewards its senior officials for the great job they do.  Think Obamacare a few years from now and you will see those responsible for enforcing its bureaucratic rules being rewarded for similar successes.   http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/20140620_VA_80_percent_of_senior_executives_got_bonuses.html

A different but related item.  The Supreme Court's ruling on an EPA case offers opportunities to attack Obama's unilateral changes to the Obamacare law.  Read this:  The court ruled "An agency has no power to ‘tailor’ legislation to bureaucratic policy goals by rewriting unambiguous statutory terms.” The EPA’s argument, Scalia wrote, “would deal a severe blow to the Constitution’s separation of powers,” because the president lacks the power "to revise clear statutory terms that turn out not to work in practice.”   http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-06-24/poison-pill-hidden-in-the-epa-ruling  

George Burns