These days
there has been a lot of talk of nullification – the refusal of a
state to allow the enforcement within its borders of an unconstitutional
federal law – and even secession. This is not allowed in the United
States. We are supposed to let the New York Times dictate
the terms of the national debate, and the Times has not indicated
that these topics are on the table for discussion.
What kind of national health program we ought to have, how much the political class should expropriate us, or whether that foreign country ought to be bombed right away or starved to death first – this is how the Times prefers it. The debate is framed from the establishment’s point of view, and no matter how it comes out, the vested interests and the status quo prevail.
Read more: http://lewrockwell.com/woods/woods213.html
What kind of national health program we ought to have, how much the political class should expropriate us, or whether that foreign country ought to be bombed right away or starved to death first – this is how the Times prefers it. The debate is framed from the establishment’s point of view, and no matter how it comes out, the vested interests and the status quo prevail.
Read more: http://lewrockwell.com/woods/woods213.html
No comments:
Post a Comment