Friday, November 2, 2012

October Jobs in Focus, but November Could Be Key

Traders are watching to see if any surprises show up in the October employment report, the last before the election, but the real surprise could come in the November number when the aftereffects of Super Storm Sandy are felt in the job market.
Economists expect the October report to show a tepid 125,000 new nonfarm payrolls and a steady unemployment rate of 7.8 percent, according to Reuters.  The report has been considered key since it is the final report card on job growth ahead of Tuesday’s presidential election, and expectations are low.
But it also may be the one to watch ahead of November’s report, when some economists think the impact from Sandy will result in less hiring, despite the need for construction and other workers in the storm hit east coast corridor. Estimates of economic impact from Sandy are as high as $50 billion, and Eqecat Thursday said it now expects insured damage to total $10 to $20 billion, with 64 percent of the losses in New York and New Jersey.
“We won’t see the effect of hurricane Sandy or storm Sandy (in the October report)…It won’t show up because the survey was taken before the disaster hit,” said Diane Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial.
“Any interruption to hours worked and hourly workers, it would be somewhat offset in the month of November by the increase in overtime for emergency workers and with the increase with construction workers coming in. It redistributes employment because of the need to get things up and running as quickly as possible. It ends up being winners and losers,” she said.
Swonk said the storm will provide some fiscal stimulus as aid money pours into the hard hit areas of the east coast, particularly the New Jersey coast and New York City and Long Island. “There will be some enormous government investment outlays from Sandy. That money is literally being dropped from the skies, from helicopters. How it shows up in the numbers has yet to be seen because there are offsets.”

Read more: http://www.cnbc.com/id/49628327

No comments: