Count on it. The devastating sworn statement by the chief investigator
of Mr. Obama’s forged White House birth certificate, exclusively
revealed by WND today, will not be mentioned by any mainstream news
medium.
When the history of Obama’s fall comes to be written, WND’s revelation of Sheriff Arpaio cold-case posse chief Mike Zullo’s affidavit will be recorded as the moment the position of Black Jesus – as one of his staff dubbed him – became untenable.
Zullo’s gripping 6,000-word affidavit remorselessly chronicles ducking and diving by furtive Hawaiian state officials – Democrats to a man – who obstruct justice by not letting forensic experts inspect Obama’s original birth records.
The Zullo Memorandum reads like a top-notch thriller. But it is not fiction. The first question it will raise in readers’ minds has four words. Why hide genuine records?
If Obama’s birth records are the real deal, why won’t Hawaii let the scrutineers demonstrate that those the hard left dub “birthers” are indeed pointy-heads?
A fraud detective’s yardstick: Guys hiding stuff may have stuff to hide.
The Zullo Memorandum prompts another question – one raised by readers regardless of their opinion on the forgery.
What are the chances a forgery engaged in by one of the most powerful people in the world would be so bad?
How come the conspirators are extremely effective at keeping everything about their operations hidden, but inept at forging simple documents?
Here is the answer. The fraud sleuth’s null hypothesis is that the Fall of Man never happened, and everyone is as pure as the driven snow. The legal test for fraud is – rightly – so rigorous that detectives spend most of their time trying to exonerate those they investigate.
Most frauds follow a recognized profile involving an individual or small group surrounded by many useful idiots who, for social convenience, political predilection, or pure profit, ignore, excuse, or deny the fraud long after the evidence has become conclusive.
Read more: http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_32543.php
When the history of Obama’s fall comes to be written, WND’s revelation of Sheriff Arpaio cold-case posse chief Mike Zullo’s affidavit will be recorded as the moment the position of Black Jesus – as one of his staff dubbed him – became untenable.
Zullo’s gripping 6,000-word affidavit remorselessly chronicles ducking and diving by furtive Hawaiian state officials – Democrats to a man – who obstruct justice by not letting forensic experts inspect Obama’s original birth records.
The Zullo Memorandum reads like a top-notch thriller. But it is not fiction. The first question it will raise in readers’ minds has four words. Why hide genuine records?
If Obama’s birth records are the real deal, why won’t Hawaii let the scrutineers demonstrate that those the hard left dub “birthers” are indeed pointy-heads?
A fraud detective’s yardstick: Guys hiding stuff may have stuff to hide.
The Zullo Memorandum prompts another question – one raised by readers regardless of their opinion on the forgery.
What are the chances a forgery engaged in by one of the most powerful people in the world would be so bad?
How come the conspirators are extremely effective at keeping everything about their operations hidden, but inept at forging simple documents?
Here is the answer. The fraud sleuth’s null hypothesis is that the Fall of Man never happened, and everyone is as pure as the driven snow. The legal test for fraud is – rightly – so rigorous that detectives spend most of their time trying to exonerate those they investigate.
Most frauds follow a recognized profile involving an individual or small group surrounded by many useful idiots who, for social convenience, political predilection, or pure profit, ignore, excuse, or deny the fraud long after the evidence has become conclusive.
Read more: http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_32543.php
No comments:
Post a Comment