Late last month I published a piece on the serious financial problems
at the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), the government
corporation that guarantees private pension plans (see “The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation: Who Will Guarantee This Guarantor?”).
The article prompted a thoughtful response from Josh Gotbaum, the director of the PBGC. His response follows, along with my additional comments:
The article prompted a thoughtful response from Josh Gotbaum, the director of the PBGC. His response follows, along with my additional comments:
The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
which guarantees the pensions of more than 40 million Americans, has
had a financial deficit for over a decade.
PBGC pays pensions when bankrupt companies can’t afford them. Recently, some analysts decided that PBGC itself
will become bankrupt and that taxpayers will end up footing the bill.
Alex Pollock, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, notes
accurately that PBGC was intended to be self-financing yet has a $26
billion deficit, and despairs that both the death of traditional
pensions and the bankruptcy of PBGC are inevitable. Mr. Pollock writes,
“A financial way out for the PBGC is not apparent and none is being
proposed.”
As one who’s spent the last two years
running PBGC, working both to put its finances in order and to preserve
pensions, let me respectfully disagree.
For starters, let’s be clear: A taxpayer
bailout is not our agenda. PBGC has never taken a dime from taxpayers
and we want to keep it that way.
PBGC funds come from premiums paid by the
pension plans we insure (and from recoveries from the plans we take
over). However, Congress sets those premiums, not PBGC—and it has set
them too low. From time to time, Congress raises the premiums—it did so
again last month—but always bows to pressure to keep them low. If
Congress keeps this up, Mr. Pollock will be right: PBGC eventually will
either get a taxpayer bailout or, if not, go bankrupt.
Read more: http://www.american.com/archive/2012/july/who-will-guarantee-this-guarantor-part-two
Read more: http://www.american.com/archive/2012/july/who-will-guarantee-this-guarantor-part-two
No comments:
Post a Comment